MedTrace Logo

Evaluating the Device FLEXITHERALIGHT Compared to the Conventional Photodynamic Therapy

NCT03076918 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 29

Last updated 2026-04-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares the efficacy and tolerance of a new device (FLEXITHERALIGHT) for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of keratosis actinic in comparison of classical PDT with Aktilite®.

Conditions

  • Keratosis, Actinic

Interventions

DEVICE

FLEXITHERALIGHT PDT

Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 30 minutes+illumination 2.5 hours

DEVICE

Aktilite® Galderma

Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 3 hours+illumination 7 to 10 minutes

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Research Agency, France

    collaborator OTHER

  • Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

    collaborator OTHER_GOV

  • University Hospital, Lille

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Laurent Mortier, MD, PhD · University Hospital, Lille

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-09-30
Primary Completion
2017-02-28
Completion
2017-02-28

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03076918 on ClinicalTrials.gov