MedTrace Logo

Randomized Comparison of JUDkins vs tiGEr Catheter in Coronary Angiography Via the Right Radial Artery: the JUDGE Study

NCT03042845 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 640

Last updated 2017-05-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aim to assess safety and efficiency of Tiger II (5Fr; Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, New Jersey) vs Judkins (5Fr; 3.5L/4R, Medtronic Co) catheters, in coronary angiography via the right transradial route. This is a prospective, randomized, two-centre, study of parallel design. Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), eligible for non-urgent coronary angiography, are randomized after successful cannulation of right radial artery and informed consent to either Tigger II or Judkins 3.5L/4R catheters.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Tiger cardiac catheter

Tiger cardiac catheter

DEVICE

Judkins 3.5L/4R cardiac catheters

Judkins 3.5L/4R cardiac catheters

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital of Patras

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-01
Primary Completion
2017-05-25
Completion
2017-05-25

Countries

  • Greece

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03042845 on ClinicalTrials.gov