Automated Closed-Loop Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy in Abdominal Surgery

NCT03039946 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2017-03-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic variables and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery. Patients will receive either an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) guided by non-invasive flow monitoring or a restrictive fluid therapy of 4ml/kg/h.

Conditions

  • Abdominal Laparoscopic and/or Robotic Surgery

Interventions

DEVICE

Closed-Loop GDFT

Patients receive fluids in the form of 100ml boluses of crystalloid (Plasmalyte) over 6 minutes via an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) system guided by non-invasive flow monitoring (Clearsight system). Additional boluses of colloid or crystalloid can be administered under the attending anesthesiologist's discretion (e.g. to compensate blood loss) .

OTHER

Restrictive Fluid Therapy

Patients receive fluids (Plasmalyte) via a restrictive approach with a baseline of of 4ml/kg/h. Additional boluses of colloid or crystalloid can be administered under the attending anesthesiologist's discretion (e.g. to compensate blood loss) .

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Erasme University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-03-31
Completion
2017-03-31

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03039946 on ClinicalTrials.gov