HAIC Versus TACE for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B.

NCT02973685 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 315

Last updated 2023-06-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

A standard hepatic artery catheter was introduced via the femoral artery percutaneously. Selective catheterization of the proper hepatic artery was performed using standard diagnostic catheters and fluoroscopic guidance. In the event of multiple arterial supply(including superior-mesenteric artery), the proportion of the liver supplied by each artery was estimated by the arteriogram. After optimal positioning of the catheter in dominant supplying artery to ensure minimal reflux, the catheter was fixed and connected with infusion tube. In the condition of multiple tumors on both left and right lobe, the gastroduodenal artery was embolized and the catheter was positioned in the hepatic proper artery for infusion. Folfox Protocol were infused through the fixed catheter sequentially.

PROCEDURE

Transarterial chemoembolization

Previous procedure was same with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. After optimal positioning of the catheter, TACE Drug Protocol were injected.

DRUG

Folfox Protocol

oxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-FU

DRUG

TACE Drug Protocol

lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs(EADM , lobaplatin, with or without MMC) followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • First People's Hospital of Foshan

    collaborator OTHER
  • Sun Yat-sen University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ming Shi, MD · The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-01
Primary Completion
2020-11-28
Completion
2020-11-28

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02973685 on ClinicalTrials.gov