Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Idiopathic Slow-transit Constipation
NCT02961582 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 67
Last updated 2022-06-13
Summary
Rationale: Previous reviews showed that the evidence regarding the effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with therapy-resistant, idiopathic (slow-transit) constipation is of suboptimal quality. Furthermore, there is no estimate of costs and cost-effectiveness in this patient group.
Objective: The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of SNM compared to personalized conservative treatment (PCT), in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation who are refractory to conservative treatment. The secondary objectives are assessing the 1) costs, 2) cost-effectiveness and 3) budget-impact of SNM compared to PCT.
Hypothesis: Based on previous research we hypothesize that SNM will be more effective than PCT in terms of a significantly higher proportion of patients having treatment success at 6 months.
Study design: An open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) combined with a prospective cohort study.
Study population: Adolescent (14-17 years) and adult (18-80 years) patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation refractory to conservative treatment.
Intervention: The intervention is SNM, a minimally invasive surgical procedure consisting of two phases. In the screening phase an electrode is inserted near the third sacral nerve and connected to an external stimulator. If the screening phase is successful (average defecation frequency (DF) ≥3 a week), the electrode is connected to a pacemaker that is implanted in the buttocks of the patient. If not successful, patients receive conservative treatment. The control intervention is PCT. This is the best and least invasive alternative to SNM. PCT consists of medication and/or retrograde colonic irrigation.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is success at 6 months, defined as an average DF of ≥3 a week according to a 3-week defecation diary. Secondary outcomes are straining, sense of incomplete evacuation, constipation severity, fatigue, constipation specific and generic (health-related) quality of life ((HR)QOL), and costs at 6 months. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness and budget-impact will be estimated.
Conditions
- Constipation
- Surgery
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Sacral Neuromodulation
SNM starts with a screening phase. In this phase a tined lead is inserted into the third sacral foramen and attached to an external stimulator, after which the patient enters a four-week stimulation test period. If the screening phase is successful (defecation frequency (DF) ≥3 a week), the external stimulator is changed for a pacemaker that is implanted in the buttocks. If the screening phase is unsuccessful (DF \<3 a week), the lead is explanted. Patients in the intervention group are asked to limit the use of additional conservative treatments for constipation (such as laxatives and colonic irrigation) to what is necessary to relieve (the most severe) complaints. What is necessary to relieve complaints is determined by the patient.
- OTHER
-
Personalized Conservative Treatment
The control group will receive the best and least invasive alternative treatment, which is personalized conservative treatment (PCT). PCT includes, a combination of laxative/medication use and/or colonic irrigation, depending on the preferences of the patient. Use of PCT will be documented.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dutch National Health Care Institute
collaborator OTHER - collaborator INDUSTRY
-
Maastricht University Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Stéphanie O Breukink, Dr. · Maastricht University Medical Centre+
-
Carmen D Dirksen, Prof. dr. · Maastricht University Medical Centre+
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 14 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-02-21
- Primary Completion
- 2021-07-31
- Completion
- 2021-12-31
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Anal Incontinence and Bowel Control
NCT00200005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cerebral Responses During Bilateral/Unilateral Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Idiopathic Faecal Incontinence
NCT01095029 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Time of Effect Onset in Treating Overactive Bladder or Non Obstructive Urinary Retention by Sacral Neuromodulation
NCT02040519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Neuromodulation & Urodynamics
NCT03614767 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Screening Method in Sacral Neuromodulation
NCT01130415 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Children With Pelvic Floor Dyssynergia
NCT06528470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Fecal Incontinence
NCT00200057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence - Placebo or Clinical Effective
NCT03261622 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
OptiLUTS Part C: the Development of a Symptom Assessment Tool in Sacral Neuromodulation.
NCT05313984 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacral Neuromodulation Test With Bilateral First Stage Tined Lead Procedure in Patients With Non-obstructive Urinary Retention: A Pilot Study
NCT00878176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05626816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Neuromodulation in Children and Adolescents
NCT04713085 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improving the Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence by Alteration of Stimulation Parameters
NCT01254695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Point-of-care Anorectal Testing to Predict Outcomes With Biofeedback Therapy: Clinical Trial
NCT04159350 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Superficial Peroneal Nerve Neuromodulation for Non-Obstructive Urinary Retention
NCT04000763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Anticholinergic Medication and Sacral Neuromodulation to Treat Refractory Overactive Bladder
NCT01047046 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacral Neuromodulation as Treatment for Fecal Incontinence
NCT03825575 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Double Incontinence
NCT07212387 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation. Part 1
NCT03194425 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation Part 2
NCT03199443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cost Profile and Budget Implications of Rechargeable Versus Non-rechargeable Sacral Neuromodulation Devices for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
NCT07173517 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Sacral Nerve Modulation and Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01069016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Seated Evaluation of Anorectal funcTion by High Resolution Anorectal Manometry
NCT02633592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation for FI
NCT03899181 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
French Post-Inscription Study on Sacral Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01957969 ·Status: COMPLETED