MedTrace Logo

Computer-Assisted Hair Implantation Using ARTAS System VS Manual Implantation Technique Hair Restoration Study

NCT02914587 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2017-02-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To investigate and compare the safety and effectiveness of the ARTAS™ System to manual hair follicle implantation method following a nine month period of post-procedure evaluation.

Conditions

  • Androgenic Alopecia

Interventions

DEVICE

ARTAS System

OTHER

Manual Implantation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Restoration Robotics, Inc.

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
29 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-31
Primary Completion
2017-10-31
Completion
2017-10-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02914587 on ClinicalTrials.gov