MedTrace Logo

Routinely Deferred Versus Early Intervention in Elderly Patients With Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

NCT02900001 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 696

Last updated 2017-10-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a routinely deferred invasive strategy in comparison with an early invasive strategy in Chinese elderly patients of 75 years or older with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, aiming to test the hypothesis that routinely deferred invasive strategy is not inferior to early invasive strategy in such an elderly group of patients.

Conditions

  • Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

early coronary angiography

Routine coronary angiography and revascularization if appropriate within 24 hours

PROCEDURE

delayed coronary angiography

Routine coronary angiography and revascularization if appropriate after 72 hours

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yuejin Yang, M.D., PhD. · National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Fuwai Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-01
Primary Completion
2019-10-30
Completion
2019-10-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02900001 on ClinicalTrials.gov