Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Doses of COR-001 (NCT NCT02868229)

NCT ID: NCT02868229

Last Updated: 2021-07-30

Results Overview

The MTD assessment was based on safety data. If more than 2 of 8 active participants in a cohort experience a Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT), the MTD was considered to have been exceeded. The DLT threshold was defined using a threshold of greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 events, which includes severe: infusion-related reactions, cardiopulmonary infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, or hypersensitivity. DLTs are defined as follows: 1. Confirmed Grade 3 neutropenia and representing a decline of \> 25% from baseline 2. Serious adverse events (SAEs) of infection in the presence of confirmed Grade 2 or higher new onset lymphopenia or new onset neutropenia. 3. ≥ Grade 3 ALT (Alanine transaminase) or AST(Aspartate transaminase) 4. ≥ Grade 4 hematologic toxicity 5. ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

61 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Weeks 0-24

Results posted on

2021-07-30

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at 13 sites in the United States.

Participants were randomized to ziltivekimab (COR-001) or placebo within each cohort. For the first and other higher dose cohorts, first 2 participants were randomized 1:1 to ziltivekimab or placebo, and were treated at least 48 hours prior to the remaining participants randomized in a 7:1 ratio of ziltivekimab to placebo. For cohorts with doses less than the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determined from earlier cohorts, randomization was done in 8:2 ratio of ziltivekimab to placebo.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Overall Study
STARTED
12
16
16
17
Overall Study
Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
12
16
16
17
Overall Study
Pharmacodynamic (PD) Population
12
16
13
12
Overall Study
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population
12
16
16
17
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Population
12
16
16
17
Overall Study
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Population
12
16
16
16
Overall Study
COMPLETED
11
16
15
12
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
1
5

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0
0
1
Overall Study
Death
0
0
1
1
Overall Study
Missed dose
0
0
0
3

Baseline Characteristics

Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Doses of COR-001

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Total
n=61 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=31 Participants
Age, Continuous
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23 • n=99 Participants
61.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95 • n=107 Participants
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98 • n=206 Participants
57.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56 • n=7 Participants
61.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24 • n=31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-24

Population: The MTD analysis population included all participants in the safety analysis population, which included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication with exception of those replaced due to a non-safety reason.

The MTD assessment was based on safety data. If more than 2 of 8 active participants in a cohort experience a Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT), the MTD was considered to have been exceeded. The DLT threshold was defined using a threshold of greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 events, which includes severe: infusion-related reactions, cardiopulmonary infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, or hypersensitivity. DLTs are defined as follows: 1. Confirmed Grade 3 neutropenia and representing a decline of \> 25% from baseline 2. Serious adverse events (SAEs) of infection in the presence of confirmed Grade 2 or higher new onset lymphopenia or new onset neutropenia. 3. ≥ Grade 3 ALT (Alanine transaminase) or AST(Aspartate transaminase) 4. ≥ Grade 4 hematologic toxicity 5. ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Characterization of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Infection SAEs with confirmed Grade 2 or higher new onset lymphopenia or new onset neutropenia.
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
Characterization of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
>= Grade 3 ALT or AST
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
Characterization of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
>= Grade 4 hematologic toxicity
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
Characterization of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
>= Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
Characterization of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Confirmed Grade 3 neutropenia and representing a decline of > 25% from baseline
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from the baseline in hsCRP values to week 4 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP): Week 4
0.373 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 3.765
-10.383 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 10.395
-11.981 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 8.232
-14.561 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 11.836

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from the baseline in serum amyloid A (SAA) values to week 4 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Serum Amyloid A (SAA): Week 4
-3.733 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.955
-22.056 mg/L
Standard Deviation 37.914
-9.878 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.687
-31.910 mg/L
Standard Deviation 41.502

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.

Frequency of events of interest by treatment group and dose from baseline until the end of the safety follow-up period (week 24) were reported. Adverse events of special interest included severe infusion-related reactions, hypersensitivity reaction during study drug infusion, anaphylaxis and neutropenia events of grade 2 or higher (i.e., absolute neutrophil count \<1500/mm\^3 and decline by at least 25% from baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Number of Adverse Events of Special Interest
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events
0 Events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0-24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.

An AE (adverse event) is any undesirable event or any untoward medical occurrence that occurs to a participant during the course of a study, or the protocol-defined time after study termination, whether or not that event is considered Study Drug-related. A TEAE was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of study. Number of TEAEs from baseline until the end of safety follow up (week 24) were presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
33 Events
51 Events
83 Events
66 Events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline, week 6, week 12, week 18 and week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.

A summary of the overall ECG interpretation and clinical significance from baseline until the end of the safety follow up period (week 24) is presented and categorized as Normal, Abnormal clinically significant (CS), Abnormal non clinically significant (NCS) and Missing.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 6 · Abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline · Normal
5 Participants
7 Participants
4 Participants
7 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline · Abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline · Abnormal, non clinically significant (NCS)
6 Participants
8 Participants
11 Participants
9 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline · Missing
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 6 · Normal
6 Participants
3 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 6 · Abnormal, non clinically significant (NCS)
5 Participants
12 Participants
8 Participants
10 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 6 · Missing
0 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 12 · Normal
4 Participants
5 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 12 · Abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 12 · Abnormal, non clinically significant (NCS)
7 Participants
10 Participants
10 Participants
11 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 12 · Missing
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 18 · Normal
7 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 18 · Abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 18 · Abnormal, non clinically significant (NCS)
4 Participants
11 Participants
8 Participants
9 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 18 · Missing
0 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
6 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 24 · Normal
3 Participants
5 Participants
5 Participants
0 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 24 · Abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 24 · Abnormal, non clinically significant (NCS)
7 Participants
10 Participants
8 Participants
10 Participants
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Week 24 · Missing
1 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
6 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-35

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels.

Number of participants who developed ADAs from baseline until the end of the extended follow up period (week 35) were reported. Samples with detectable ADAs were classified as positive for ADAs. Samples without detectable ADAs were classified as negative for ADAs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)
Positive
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)
Negative
10 Participants
14 Participants
15 Participants
13 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-35

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels.

Number of participants with ADA titers for ADA-positive samples from baseline to week 35 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Number of Participants With ADA Titers
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and week 1) to week 35

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels.

Number of participants with neutralizing ADAs from baseline to week 35 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing ADAs
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in TSAT to week 4 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT): Week 4
0.467 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 6.733
5.622 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 12.942
1.806 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 11.197
15.778 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 12.384

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in TSAT to the mean of weeks 10-12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in TSAT: Mean of Weeks 10-12
2.278 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 8.093
6.417 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 7.157
9.167 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 8.569
9.028 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 6.121

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in CHr to week 4 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Reticulocyte Hemoglobin (CHr): Week 4
-0.265 Picograms (pg)
Standard Deviation 1.216
1.197 Picograms (pg)
Standard Deviation 1.183
1.188 Picograms (pg)
Standard Deviation 1.090
0.286 Picograms (pg)
Standard Deviation 2.265

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hs-CRP to the mean of 10-12 weeks is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP): Mean of 10-12 Weeks
-0.021 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.293
-0.534 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.439
-0.916 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.337
-1.462 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.554

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in SAA to the mean of weeks 10-12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in SAA: Mean of Weeks 10-12
-1.262 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.056
-24.323 mg/L
Standard Deviation 41.375
-8.688 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.665
-30.324 mg/L
Standard Deviation 37.812

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in serum pre-albumin to the mean of 10-12 weeks is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Serum Pre-albumin: Mean of 10-12 Weeks
0.273 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.716
6.032 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 6.989
8.571 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.362
11.170 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 4.983

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in albumin to week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Albumin: Week 12
0.042 Grams per decilitre (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.288
0.122 Grams per decilitre (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.212
0.192 Grams per decilitre (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.151
0.336 Grams per decilitre (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.192

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (weekly mean of screening) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in ERI to week 4 is presented. ERI is defined as the epoetin alfa-equivalent dose (weight-based per week in U/kg) divided by the serum hemoglobin (in g/dL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Erythropoietin Resistance Index (ERI): Week 4
-1.444 (Unit/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 3.590
-0.975 (Unit/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.716
-3.175 (Unit/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 4.761
-4.211 (Unit/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.785

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (weekly mean of screening), week 8, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in ERI to the mean of weeks 8-12 is presented. ERI is defined as the epoetin alfa-equivalent dose (weight-based per week in U/kg) divided by the serum hemoglobin (in g/dL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in ERI: Mean of Weeks 8-12
-2.714 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 10.546
-5.689 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 7.824
-7.842 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.231
-8.787 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.952

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (weekly mean of screening), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in ERI to the mean of weeks 10-12 is presented. ERI is defined as the epoetin alfa-equivalent dose (weight-based per week in U/kg) divided by the serum hemoglobin (in g/dL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in ERI: Mean of Weeks 10-12
-2.112 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 11.476
-6.477 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.756
-8.272 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.770
-8.690 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 6.005

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in CHr to the mean of weeks 10-12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in CHr: Mean of Weeks 10-12
-0.035 pg
Standard Deviation 1.264
0.859 pg
Standard Deviation 1.098
1.271 pg
Standard Deviation 1.264
1.143 pg
Standard Deviation 1.635

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin to week 4 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin: Week 4
-0.043 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.416
0.473 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.751
0.805 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.957
0.973 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.720

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin to weeks 10-12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin: Mean of Weeks 10-12
-0.107 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.756
0.848 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.156
0.963 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.131
0.772 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.236

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1), week 10, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin to weeks 10-12, excluding hemoglobin values following a change in the total weekly ESA (erythropoiesis stimulating agent) dose is presented. A change is defined as the first time when the ESA weekly dose goes up by \>25% or down by \>25% relative to the previous week's dose.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin: Mean of Weeks 10-12, Excluding Hemoglobin Values Following a Change in the Total Weekly ESA Dose
0.352 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.225
0.228 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.506
0.627 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.988
0.567 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.226

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (weekly mean of screening) to week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in ERI to week 12 is presented. ERI is defined as the epoetin alfa-equivalent dose (weight-based per week in U/kg) divided by the serum hemoglobin (in g/dL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in ERI: Week 12
-3.229 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 12.084
-6.381 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.956
-8.835 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.785
-8.690 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 6.356

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (weekly mean of screening), week 9, week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in ERI to the mean of weeks 9-12 is presented. ERI is defined as the epoetin alfa-equivalent dose (weight-based per week in U/kg) divided by the serum hemoglobin (in g/dL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in ERI: Mean of Weeks 9-12
-2.320 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 11.392
-6.338 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.870
-8.293 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 8.780
-8.756 (Units/kg/week) per (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.949

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 12

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin to week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin: Week 12
0.130 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.240
0.502 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.029
0.806 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.234
0.755 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.379

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline (mean of screening and day 1) to week 24

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change from baseline in hemoglobin to week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin: Week 24
-0.803 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.929
0.154 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.083
-0.267 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.826
-0.079 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.703

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From screening to week 4

Population: The pharmacodynamic (PD) population included all randomized participants who received their assigned study drug, had any PD assessments, and did not have major protocol violations. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Change in hemoglobin from screening to peak hemoglobin at week 4 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Change in Hemoglobin From Screening to Peak Hemoglobin: Week 4
-0.043 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.416
0.473 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.751
0.805 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.957
0.973 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.720

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of basophils at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Basophils: Week 12
0.03 10^3 cells per microliter(10^3 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.048
0.02 10^3 cells per microliter(10^3 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.041
0.04 10^3 cells per microliter(10^3 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.051
0.03 10^3 cells per microliter(10^3 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.062

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of basophils at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Basophil: Week 24
0.05 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.052
0.04 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.062
0.08 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.083
0.02 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.042

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Basophils to leukocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Basophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 12
0.65 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.458
0.45 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.553
0.95 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.447
0.87 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.954

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Basophils to leukocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Basophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 24
0.62 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.458
0.83 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.722
1.29 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.296
0.57 Ratio of basophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 0.521

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of eosinophils at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Eosinophils: Week 12
0.16 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.070
0.35 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.247
0.18 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.080
0.65 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.706

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of eosinophils at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Eosinophils: Week 24
0.19 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.083
0.29 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.189
0.30 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.336
0.36 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.683

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Eosinophils to leukocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Eosinophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 12
3.39 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.433
5.56 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 3.234
4.14 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.669
7.32 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 10.738

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The eosinophils to leukocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Eosinophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 24
3.49 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.611
4.44 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.287
5.32 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 4.748
3.98 Ratio of eosinophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 3.985

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: Week 12
30.2 pg
Standard Deviation 1.48
31.3 pg
Standard Deviation 2.66
30.8 pg
Standard Deviation 2.15
31.2 pg
Standard Deviation 2.48

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin: Week 24
29.5 pg
Standard Deviation 2.54
31.0 pg
Standard Deviation 2.80
30.6 pg
Standard Deviation 2.40
29.6 pg
Standard Deviation 2.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular HGB concentration at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration: Week 12
30.86 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.332
31.41 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.438
29.75 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.563
31.23 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.978

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular HGB concentration at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration: Week 24
30.78 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.572
31.04 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.307
29.52 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.799
30.28 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.297

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: Week 12
98.16 femtoliters (fL)
Standard Deviation 4.328
99.35 femtoliters (fL)
Standard Deviation 6.923
103.49 femtoliters (fL)
Standard Deviation 9.153
99.97 femtoliters (fL)
Standard Deviation 8.089

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume: Week 24
95.70 fL
Standard Deviation 6.096
99.69 fL
Standard Deviation 6.859
103.53 fL
Standard Deviation 8.550
97.76 fL
Standard Deviation 6.983

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocytes at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocytes: Week 12
3.464 10^6 cells per microliter(10^6 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.302
3.348 10^6 cells per microliter(10^6 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.438
3.459 10^6 cells per microliter(10^6 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.411
3.370 10^6 cells per microliter(10^6 cells/uL)
Standard Deviation 0.345

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of erythrocytes at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Erythrocytes: Week 24
3.312 10^6 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.480
3.256 10^6 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.347
3.111 10^6 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.388
3.365 10^6 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.513

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hematocrit at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hematocrit: Week 12
34.0 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 3.43
33.1 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 3.31
35.6 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 3.13
33.7 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 4.24

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hematocrit at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hematocrit: Week 24
31.5 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 3.72
32.4 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 2.78
32.2 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 4.11
32.8 Percentage of Hematocrit
Standard Deviation 3.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hemoglobin at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hemoglobin: Week 12
10.51 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.190
10.37 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.928
10.56 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.018
10.53 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.360

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hemoglobin at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hemoglobin: Week 24
9.68 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.057
10.06 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.031
9.47 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.135
9.87 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.215

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hypochromatic red cells at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hypochromatic Red Cells Week 12
13.65 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 15.015
12.09 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 11.191
23.65 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 22.214
11.99 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 14.657

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hypochromatic red cells at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hypochromatic Red Cells: Week 24
11.88 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 10.819
11.60 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 11.895
32.02 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 25.224
15.44 Percentage of Hypochromatic red cells
Standard Deviation 13.415

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of leukocytes at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Leukocytes: Week 12
5.23 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.718
5.84 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.837
4.68 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.069
5.25 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 3.004

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of leukocytes at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Leukocytes: Week 24
5.52 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 2.197
6.06 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.689
5.52 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.168
6.13 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 3.414

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of lymphocytes at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lymphocytes: Week 12
1.10 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.306
1.45 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.678
1.11 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.250
1.18 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.388

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of lymphocytes at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lymphocytes: Week 24
1.10 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.452
1.26 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.496
1.08 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.267
1.23 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.523

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Lymphocytes to leukocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lymphocytes to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 12
22.86 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 9.139
25.09 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 9.611
24.15 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 5.774
24.81 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 7.341

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Lymphocytes to leukocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lymphocytes to Leukocytes Ratio at Week 24
21.47 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 11.350
21.24 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 7.195
20.63 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 6.997
21.71 Ratio of lymphocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 7.633

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of monocytes at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Monocytes: Week 12
0.26 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.151
0.29 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.171
0.25 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.102
0.31 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.119

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of monocytes at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Monocytes: Week 24
0.40 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.184
0.39 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.200
0.31 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.138
0.30 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.067

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Monocytes to leukocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Monocytes to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 12
5.61 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.871
5.42 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.649
5.15 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.652
6.21 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.230

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Monocytes to leukocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Monocytes to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 24
7.04 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.369
6.29 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.281
5.49 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 1.770
5.77 Ratio of monocytes to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 2.396

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of neutrophils at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Neutrophils: Week 12
3.68 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.611
3.70 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.455
3.09 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 0.921
3.09 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.354

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of neutrophils at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Neutrophils: Week 24
3.82 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.795
4.08 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.252
3.71 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 1.047
4.25 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 2.507

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Neutrophils to leukocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Neutrophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 12
67.29 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 11.707
62.41 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 10.148
65.61 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 7.447
60.79 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 9.656

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Neutrophils to leukocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Neutrophils to Leukocytes Ratio: Week 24
67.37 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 13.396
67.21 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 8.771
67.31 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 8.293
67.94 Ratio of neutrophils to leukocytes
Standard Deviation 8.750

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of platelets at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Platelets: Week 12
169.8 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 68.37
168.3 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 38.62
129.4 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 42.26
143.8 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 48.68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of platelets at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Platelets: Week 24
180.2 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 62.44
203.1 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 57.78
151.6 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 41.75
160.1 10^3 cells/uL
Standard Deviation 55.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Reticulocytes to erythrocytes ratio at week 12 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Reticulocytes to Erythrocytes Ratio: Week 12
1.92 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.852
1.68 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.757
2.14 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 1.203
2.32 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 1.537

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Reticulocytes to erythrocytes ratio at week 24 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Reticulocytes to Erythrocytes Ratio: Week 24
1.95 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.872
1.96 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.669
1.84 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.612
2.24 Ratio of reticulocytes to erythrocytes
Standard Deviation 0.935

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of alanine aminotransferase at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Alanine Aminotransferase: Week 12
12.1 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 6.61
18.6 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 13.85
19.9 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 10.89
19.0 units per liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 9.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of alanine aminotransferase at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Alanine Aminotransferase: Week 24
8.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 4.67
11.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 4.78
15.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 6.81
15.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 6.35

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of albumin at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Albumin: Week 12
3.96 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.382
3.90 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.210
3.97 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.304
3.98 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.273

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of albumin at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Albumin: Week 24
3.75 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.432
3.83 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.305
3.77 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.347
3.84 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.456

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of alkaline phosphatase at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Alkaline Phosphatase: Week 12
103.0 U/L
Standard Deviation 56.43
125.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 87.32
107.5 U/L
Standard Deviation 57.54
106.2 U/L
Standard Deviation 44.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of alkaline phosphatase at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Alkaline Phosphatase: Week 24
99.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 51.17
140.6 U/L
Standard Deviation 119.26
121.2 U/L
Standard Deviation 55.26
95.2 U/L
Standard Deviation 53.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of aspartate aminotransferase at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Week 12
15.5 U/L
Standard Deviation 5.89
18.1 U/L
Standard Deviation 11.57
20.5 U/L
Standard Deviation 10.85
15.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 4.61

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of aspartate aminotransferase at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Week 24
14.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 5.57
14.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 5.59
17.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 7.75
14.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 3.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of bicarbonate at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Bicarbonate: Week 12
23.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 3.06
23.1 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 3.03
22.7 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 3.26
25.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 3.50

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of bicarbonate at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Bicarbonate: Week 24
23.3 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.00
24.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.83
22.4 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.43
26.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of bilirubin at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Bilirubin: Week 12
0.490 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.186
0.450 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.157
0.603 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.234
0.553 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.150

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of bilirubin at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Bilirubin: Week 24
0.450 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.169
0.430 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.142
0.565 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.184
0.520 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.125

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of calcium at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Calcium: Week 12
8.89 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.883
8.54 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.737
8.90 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.777
8.39 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.727

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of calcium at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Calcium: Week 24
8.73 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.740
8.95 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.734
8.76 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.653
8.82 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.011

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of chloride at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Chloride: Week 12
97.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.69
98.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 5.34
98.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.87
98.5 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.47

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of chloride at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Chloride: Week 24
98.5 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.67
97.7 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.76
98.7 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.15
97.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.73

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of cholesterol at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Cholesterol: Week 12
140.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 41.24
140.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 40.51
145.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 41.38
146.0 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 43.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of cholesterol at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Cholesterol: Week 24
130.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 40.19
148.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 38.74
131.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 36.17
158.0 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 44.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of creatinine at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Creatinine: Week 12
9.458 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.739
9.616 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.642
9.227 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.526
10.115 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 3.391

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of creatinine at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Creatinine: Week 24
9.086 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.260
9.173 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.541
9.027 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.216
9.703 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 3.714

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of direct bilirubin at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Direct Bilirubin: Week 12
0.101 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.071
0.098 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.066
0.123 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.049
0.118 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.059

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of direct bilirubin at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Direct Bilirubin: Week 24
0.105 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.081
0.081 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.046
0.124 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.053
0.102 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.042

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of glucose at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Glucose: Week 12
123.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 52.29
128.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 66.17
119.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 73.49
101.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 19.86

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of glucose at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Glucose: Week 24
129.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 54.83
129.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 64.12
142.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 168.55
104.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 22.97

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of HDL cholesterol at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol: Week 12
51.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.47
50.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 18.05
54.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 17.17
52.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 15.14

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of HDL cholesterol at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
HDL Cholesterol: Week 24
50.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 17.33
45.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.02
48.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.29
46.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 22.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hepcidin-25 at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hepcidin-25: Week 12
310.67 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 163.569
344.99 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 154.189
288.72 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 210.049
233.89 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 114.748

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of hepcidin-25 at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Hepcidin-25: Week 24
347.55 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 167.752
328.35 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 159.543
302.72 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 131.966
262.18 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 118.461

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of LDL cholesterol at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Low-density Lipoproteins (LDL) Cholesterol: Week 12
67.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 29.62
61.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 31.40
63.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 32.69
68.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 39.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of LDL cholesterol at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
LDL Cholesterol: Week 24
60.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 32.59
69.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 30.44
54.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 27.73
82.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 35.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of lipoprotein-a at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lipoprotein-a: Week 12
35.2 Nanomoles per litre (nmol/L)
Standard Deviation 38.88
86.3 Nanomoles per litre (nmol/L)
Standard Deviation 83.29
68.9 Nanomoles per litre (nmol/L)
Standard Deviation 50.11
53.1 Nanomoles per litre (nmol/L)
Standard Deviation 41.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of lipoprotein-a at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Lipoprotein-a: Week 24
39.3 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 37.60
96.6 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 92.52
89.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 61.25
61.9 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 52.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of phosphate at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Phosphate: Week 12
5.06 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.425
5.67 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.905
6.51 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.364
5.43 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.416

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of phosphate at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Phosphate: Week 24
5.55 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.841
4.57 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.399
5.15 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.724
5.64 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.459

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of potassium at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Potassium: Week 12
5.13 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.094
5.06 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.754
5.03 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.662
4.69 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.647

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of potassium at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Potassium: Week 24
4.96 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.628
4.97 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.581
4.71 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.466
4.75 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.762

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of sodium at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Sodium: Week 12
135.8 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.80
137.1 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.55
137.4 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.03
138.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of sodium at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Sodium: Week 24
136.7 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.04
136.2 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.90
137.8 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.24
137.2 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of triglyceride at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Triglycerides: Week 12
107.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 50.59
140.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 131.19
139.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 85.00
126.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 89.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of triglycerides at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Triglycerides: Week 24
95.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 53.98
166.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 120.39
146.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 147.52
142.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 95.94

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of urea nitrogen at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Urea Nitrogen: Week 12
61.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 26.03
61.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 17.40
53.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 12.38
62.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 21.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

The observed values of urea nitrogen at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Urea Nitrogen: Week 24
66.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 30.04
59.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.97
51.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 13.67
59.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 15.11

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis BMI values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Body Mass Index (BMI): Week 12
28.952 kilogram per meter^2 (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 5.774
29.668 kilogram per meter^2 (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 8.674
32.150 kilogram per meter^2 (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 9.365
32.574 kilogram per meter^2 (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 8.240

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion BMI values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion BMI: Week 11
29.337 Kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 6.800
29.399 Kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 8.267
31.290 Kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 8.341
34.163 Kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.950

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Diastolic Blood Pressure: Week 12
84.8 Millimetre of mercury (mm Hg)
Standard Deviation 21.14
70.4 Millimetre of mercury (mm Hg)
Standard Deviation 11.70
84.2 Millimetre of mercury (mm Hg)
Standard Deviation 10.23
76.3 Millimetre of mercury (mm Hg)
Standard Deviation 16.29

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure values at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Diastolic Blood Pressure: Week 24
76.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13.59
77.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13.23
74.0 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 14.53
78.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13.74

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion diastolic blood pressure values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Diastolic Blood Pressure: Week 11
82.3 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 19.68
66.6 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.03
75.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 11.80
78.7 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis heart rate values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Heart Rate: Week 12
69.3 beats/min
Standard Deviation 7.50
71.1 beats/min
Standard Deviation 12.20
70.8 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.03
76.9 beats/min
Standard Deviation 13.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis heart rate values at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Heart Rate: Week 24
71.8 beats/min
Standard Deviation 12.02
78.0 beats/min
Standard Deviation 11.90
72.6 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.03
78.9 beats/min
Standard Deviation 17.72

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion heart rate values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Heart Rate: Week 11
67.1 beats/min
Standard Deviation 6.11
70.1 beats/min
Standard Deviation 9.44
65.7 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.88
72.8 beats/min
Standard Deviation 9.80

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis respiration rate values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Respiration Rate: Week 12
17.8 breaths per minute (breaths/min)
Standard Deviation 1.27
17.9 breaths per minute (breaths/min)
Standard Deviation 1.29
17.9 breaths per minute (breaths/min)
Standard Deviation 1.53
18.1 breaths per minute (breaths/min)
Standard Deviation 1.31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis respiration rate values at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Respiration Rate: Week 24
16.6 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 2.69
18.1 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.09
18.3 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.60
18.4 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion respiration rate values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Respiration Rate: Week 11
18.1 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.22
17.8 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.24
18.1 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.39
18.3 breaths/min
Standard Deviation 1.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis values of systolic blood pressure at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Systolic Blood Pressure: Week 12
164.4 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 33.13
143.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 21.04
164.3 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 25.17
151.4 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 26.83

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis values of systolic blood pressure at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Systolic Blood Pressure: Week 24
149.4 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 30.43
146.7 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 19.14
157.6 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 27.45
155.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 22.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion systolic blood pressure values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Systolic Blood Pressure: Week 11
161.2 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 25.78
138.7 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 27.32
144.0 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 28.30
152.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 28.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis weight values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Weight: Week 12
84.583 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 18.464
82.162 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 28.830
92.120 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 25.720
96.213 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 29.206

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion weight values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Weight: Week 11
86.356 Kg
Standard Deviation 21.881
83.433 Kg
Standard Deviation 31.580
92.043 Kg
Standard Deviation 26.401
91.217 Kg
Standard Deviation 15.121

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 12

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis temperature values at week 12 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Temperature: Week 12
36.259 Celsius (C)
Standard Deviation 0.572
36.435 Celsius (C)
Standard Deviation 0.304
36.436 Celsius (C)
Standard Deviation 0.314
36.490 Celsius (C)
Standard Deviation 0.157

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-dialysis temperature values at week 24 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-dialysis Temperature: Week 24
36.328 C
Standard Deviation 0.384
36.440 C
Standard Deviation 0.315
36.168 C
Standard Deviation 0.370
36.361 C
Standard Deviation 0.251

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 11

Population: The safety analysis population included all participants randomized and treated with any amount of study medication. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Pre-infusion temperature values at week 11 are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Pre-infusion Temperature: Week 11
36.182 C
Standard Deviation 0.692
36.377 C
Standard Deviation 0.259
36.187 C
Standard Deviation 0.494
36.375 C
Standard Deviation 0.193

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1 (day 1, 3, and 5), Week 2 (day 8), Week 3 (day 15), Week 5 (day 29), Week 7 (day 43), Week 8 (day 50), Week 9 (day 57), Week 11 (day 71 and 75), Week 14 (day 92), Week 18 (day 120) and Week 35 (day 239).

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Area under the serum concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC 0-α) of COR-001 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC 0-α) of COR-001
11962 nanogram*day/milliliter (ng*day/mL)
Standard Deviation 4731
40911 nanogram*day/milliliter (ng*day/mL)
Standard Deviation 23629
118177 nanogram*day/milliliter (ng*day/mL)
Standard Deviation 60393

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1 (day 1, 3, and 5), Week 2 (day 8), Week 3 (day 15), Week 5 (day 29), Week 7 (day 43), Week 8 (day 50), Week 9 (day 57), Week 11 (day 71 and 75), Week 14 (day 92), Week 18 (day 120) and Week 35 (day 239).

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Elimination half-life in the initial phase (t 1/2,α) is presented from week 0 to week 35.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Elimination Half-life in the Initial Phase (t 1/2,α)
2.55 Days
Standard Deviation 0.94
1.98 Days
Standard Deviation 0.87
1.90 Days
Standard Deviation 0.70

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1 (day 1, 3, and 5), Week 2 (day 8), Week 3 (day 15), Week 5 (day 29), Week 7 (day 43), Week 8 (day 50), Week 9 (day 57), Week 11 (day 71 and 75), Week 14 (day 92), Week 18 (day 120) and Week 35 (day 239).

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Elimination half-life in the terminal phase(t 1/2, z) is presented from week 0 to week 35.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Elimination Half-life in the Terminal Phase (t 1/2, z)
51.44 Days
Standard Deviation 21.55
38.22 Days
Standard Deviation 14.21
40.93 Days
Standard Deviation 13.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1 (day 1, 3, and 5), Week 2 (day 8), Week 3 (day 15), Week 5 (day 29), Week 7 (day 43), Week 8 (day 50), Week 9 (day 57), Week 11 (day 71 and 75), Week 14 (day 92), Week 18 (day 120) and Week 35 (day 239).

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of COR-001 from week 0 to week 35 is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
378 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 93
1368 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 359
3584 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1349

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1 (day 1, 3, and 5), Week 2 (day 8), Week 3 (day 15), Week 5 (day 29), Week 7 (day 43), Week 8 (day 50), Week 9 (day 57), Week 11 (day 71 and 75), Week 14 (day 92), Week 18 (day 120) and Week 35 (day 239).

Population: The PK population included all participants who had any valid samples measured for study drug levels. Overall number of participants analysed = number of participants with available data.

Presence of ADA was a covariate for pharmacokinetics (PK) affecting V1 (volume of distribution for the central compartment). Impact of ADAs on V1 from baseline to week 35 is presented. In the below table, result presented is the bootstrap parameter estimate of the effect of ADA on V1 for a PK model that includes data for all arms combined.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Impact of ADAs on Pharmacokinetics
0.361 Milliliter (mL)
Interval 0.0548 to 0.658

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

COR-001 2 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

COR-001 6 mg

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

COR-001 20 mg

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 participants at risk
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arteriovenous fistula site complication
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arteriovenous fistula site haemorrhage
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Arteriovenous fistula site infection
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Breast abscess
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
25.0%
4/16 • Number of events 4 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive emergency
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Necrotising fasciitis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis acute
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Sudden cardiac death
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Varicella
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Vascular stent thrombosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to Ziltivekimab once every 14 days for 12 weeks treatment period. Participants were continued on Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 2 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received 2 mg ziltivekimab via Intravenous (IV) infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 6 mg
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received 6 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
COR-001 20 mg
n=17 participants at risk
Participants received 20 mg ziltivekimab via IV infusion once every 14 days over approximately 60 minutes, which started any time prior to the last 1 hour of dialysis for 12 weeks treatment period. Randomized participants were continued on ESA and parenteral iron, if being given. All the participants were hemodialysis patients.
Nervous system disorders
Unresponsive to stimuli
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access malfunction
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm ruptured
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic stenosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Appendiceal abscess
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial conduction time prolongation
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
Blood lactic acid increased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast swelling
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomegaly
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Choking
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic foot
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Drug abuse
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Dry gangrene
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
25.0%
4/16 • Number of events 5 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot deformity
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 3 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Endocrine disorders
Hyperparathyroidism
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive emergency
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hypoaesthesia oral
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Injection site erythema
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Surgical and medical procedures
Intraocular lens implant
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Eye disorders
Iris neovascularisation
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip swelling
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Metabolic encephalopathy
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Middle ear effusion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 4 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Necrosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Oedema
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis acute
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Pain
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery occlusion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary congestion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
General disorders
Secretion discharge
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling face
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
Troponin increased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Venous stenosis
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
0.00%
0/12 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/16 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.
0.00%
0/17 • Weeks 0-24
All presented AEs are TEAEs. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the study.The results are based on the safety analysis set which included all patients randomized and treated with any amount of study medication.

Additional Information

Clinical Transparency and Medical Writing Office

Novo Nordisk A/S

Phone: (+1) 866-867-7178

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER