Trial Outcomes & Findings for REduction of Physical Inactivity Facing the CAncer (NCT NCT02867475)
NCT ID: NCT02867475
Last Updated: 2026-07-02
Results Overview
CaBES scores were only collected for Study 2 to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages) on psychological barriers. The scale measures 5 dimensions of exercise-related beliefs: motivation (MOT), self-efficacy (AUTOEFF), treatment side effects (EFFSEC), benefits (BEN), and risks (RIS). Each dimension score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 6. Higher values represent a better outcome (1 indicates the lowest level and 6 indicates the highest level).
COMPLETED
NA
420 participants
Post-intervention on Day 1
2026-07-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Study 2 IM
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a self-determined peer \[PAD\] (intrinsic motivation)
|
Study 2 EM
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a non-self-determined peer \[PNAD\] (extrinsic motivation)
|
Study 1
Psychometric measures: "Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale (CaBES)"
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
54
|
306
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
60
|
54
|
306
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Study 2 IM
n=60 Participants
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a self-determined peer \[PAD\] (intrinsic motivation)
|
Study 2 EM
n=54 Participants
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a non-self-determined peer \[PNAD\] (extrinsic motivation)
|
Study 1
n=306 Participants
This group represents the initial screening and selection cohort evaluated using the Dijon Physical Activity Score. Participants who demonstrated a score of 20 or less were selected to proceed and be enrolled into Study 2. Consequently, randomized experimental interventions and specific psychometric outcomes (such as the CaBES assessment) were not administered to participants in this screening arm who did not meet the inclusion criteria for Study 2.
|
Total
n=420 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=306 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
22 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=306 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
38 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
194 Participants
n=306 Participants
|
264 Participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=60 Participants
|
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=54 Participants
|
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=306 Participants
|
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=420 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
59 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
239 Participants
n=306 Participants
|
351 Participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=54 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=306 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
60 participants
n=60 Participants
|
54 participants
n=54 Participants
|
306 participants
n=306 Participants
|
420 participants
n=420 Participants
|
|
Study 2 - Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
Study 2 - CaBES MOT
|
3.14 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04 • n=60 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
3.54 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34 • n=54 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
—
|
3.33 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 • n=114 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
|
Study 2 - Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
Study 2 - CaBES AUTOEFF
|
2.90 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 • n=60 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
3.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21 • n=54 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
—
|
3.00 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.09 • n=114 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
|
Study 2 - Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
Study 2 - CaBES EFFSEC
|
3.77 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=60 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
3.98 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.39 • n=54 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
—
|
3.87 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 • n=114 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
|
Study 2 - Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
Study 2 - CaBES BEN
|
4.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04 • n=60 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
4.78 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 • n=54 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
—
|
4.80 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05 • n=114 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
|
Study 2 - Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
Study 2 - CABES RIS
|
2.48 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02 • n=60 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
2.58 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13 • n=54 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
—
|
2.53 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07 • n=114 Participants • The CaBES scores were only collected for participants in Study 2. This psychometric assessment was designed specifically to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages), which was not an objective for the general baseline group.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-intervention on Day 1Population: This outcome measure was exclusively assessed in participants who entered Study 2. Participants in Study 1 did not complete this questionnaire, as Study 1 served solely as a preliminary screening phase to identify and select eligible patients for the randomized experimental conditions of Study 2. Therefore, no data were collected or analyzed for the Study 1 cohort.
CaBES scores were only collected for Study 2 to evaluate the impact of randomized experimental conditions (IM vs. EM messages) on psychological barriers. The scale measures 5 dimensions of exercise-related beliefs: motivation (MOT), self-efficacy (AUTOEFF), treatment side effects (EFFSEC), benefits (BEN), and risks (RIS). Each dimension score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 6. Higher values represent a better outcome (1 indicates the lowest level and 6 indicates the highest level).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study 2 EM
n=54 Participants
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a non-self-determined peer \[PNAD\] (extrinsic motivation)
|
Study 2 IM
n=57 Participants
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a self-determined peer \[PAD\] (intrinsic motivation)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
CaBes MOT
|
3.69 Score
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
3.22 Score
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
CaBes AUTOEFF
|
3.09 Score
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
2.76 Score
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
CaBes EFFSEC
|
3.85 Score
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
3.68 Score
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
CaBes BEN
|
5.32 Score
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
5.35 Score
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Cancer Beliefs and Exercise Scale - CaBES
CaBes RIS
|
2.45 Score
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
2.44 Score
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 : Time 2 (Post-intervention).Population: This outcome measure was exclusively assessed in participants who entered Study 2. Participants in Study 1 did not complete this questionnaire, as Study 1 served solely as a preliminary screening phase to identify and select eligible patients for the randomized experimental conditions of Study 2. Therefore, no data were collected or analyzed for the Study 1 cohort.
Evaluation of the identification with the character in the video using 3 items adapted from McQueen and Kreuter (1999). Scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating stronger perceived similarity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study 2 EM
n=54 Participants
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a non-self-determined peer \[PNAD\] (extrinsic motivation)
|
Study 2 IM
n=57 Participants
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a self-determined peer \[PAD\] (intrinsic motivation)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Similarity Between the Peer and the Patient.
|
4.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 : Time 2 (Post-intervention)Population: This outcome measure was exclusively assessed in participants who entered Study 2. Participants in Study 1 did not complete this questionnaire, as Study 1 served solely as a preliminary screening phase to identify and select eligible patients for the randomized experimental conditions of Study 2. Therefore, no data were collected or analyzed for the Study 1 cohort.
Assessment of the patient's perceived physical capabilities based on Bandura's (1997) Self-Efficacy Theory. Measured using 3 items. Scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating higher perceived capacity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study 2 EM
n=54 Participants
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a non-self-determined peer \[PNAD\] (extrinsic motivation)
|
Study 2 IM
n=57 Participants
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic Physical activity motivation: Physical activity promotion message delivered by a self-determined peer \[PAD\] (intrinsic motivation)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Physical Capacity (Self-Efficacy).
|
4.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
4.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
Adverse Events
Study 2 IM
Study 2 EM
Study 1
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60