Rational Approach to a Unilateral Pleural Effusion2
NCT02834455 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2020-12-17
Summary
Recurrent unilateral, non-infectious pleural exudate is suspicious for primary or secondary pleural malignancy. Both conditions are associated with 5-year survival of 10%. Work-up is difficult, as the pleural surface is large and \<33% of pleural malignancies shed malignant cells to the pleural fluid. Even so, additional tissue biopsies are needed for establishing mutation status for targeted therapies.
Optimal imaging to guide tissue sampling is pivotal. PET-CT has higher sensitivity than conventional CT for detecting malignant lesions \>10mm. However, no randomised trial has investigated differences in diagnostic accuracy, time-to-diagnosis, or economics. Falsely PET-positive lesions in e.g. colon however, lead to more derived tests than do CT alone.
Gold standard for pleural tissue sampling is the surgical (VATS) thoracoscopy, allowing direct visual guiding of tissue sampling from all pleural surfaces. Yet, globally the medical (pleuroscopy) thoracoscopy is more widely used: cheaper, outpatient procedure, but allows only sampling from the parietal pleura. To date, no randomised studies have compared medical and surgical thoracoscopy concerning diagnostic hit rates, adverse events, or economics.
The investigators will perform two randomized studies to investigate whether
1. PET/CT is comparable to CT alone
2. VATS is comparable to pleuroscopy concerning hit rate, total investigations performed, time-to-diagnosis.
Conditions
- Lung Neoplasms
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Contrast-enhanced CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a CE-CT
- DEVICE
-
PET-CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a PET-CT
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Simon Reuter
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Uffe Boedtger, MD, PhD · [email protected]
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-15
- Completion
- 2020-12-15
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Manometry vs Clinical Assessment in the Detection of Trapped Lung in Patients With Suspected Pleural Malignancy
NCT02805062 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Evaluation of Patients With Pleural Effusion
NCT05759117 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Pleural Disease: Phenotypes, Diagnostic Yield and Outcomes
NCT03922841 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Medical Thoracoscopy for Diagnosing Unexplained Pleural Effusion: a National Multicenter Retrospective Study
NCT06275178 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Multicentre Study Comparing Indwelling Pleural Catheter With Talc Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion Management
NCT02045121 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quantitative Diaphragmatic Ultrasound Evaluation in Pleural Effusions : A Feasability Study
NCT04264325 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial for a Rapid Pleurodesis Protocol for the Management of Pleural Effusions
NCT00758316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Pleur-X vs. Chemical Pleurodesis in VATS
NCT03518788 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Using Thoracic Ultrasound to Predict Pleurodesis Success in Malignant Pleural Effusions: a Pilot Study
NCT02625675 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions
NCT02851927 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multiple Biomarkers in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion
NCT00316134 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion - Indwelling Pleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis
NCT02825095 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Versus Pulvis Talci in Malignant Pleural Effusion
NCT02054078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusion
NCT00789087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Biomarker Levels During Indwelling Pleural cAtheter Sample Testing
NCT02092155 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Medical Thoracoscopy With Flexible Bronchoscopy Versus Semi-Rigid Pleuroscope in Pleural Effusion (FLEXPLEUR)
NCT06162429 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Effectiveness of a New Pleural Catheter for Symptomatic, Recurrent, MPEs Versus Approved Pleural Catheter
NCT02649894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Out Patient Talc Slurry Via Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Pleural Effusion Vs Usual Inpatient Management
NCT02517749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of a New Pleural Catheter for the Medical Management of Symptomatic, Recurrent, Malignant Pleural Effusions
NCT02227732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Ultrasound to Predict the Results of Draining Pleural Effusions
NCT01973985 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Tunneled Pleural Catheter in Partially Entrapped Lung
NCT00637676 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Prospective Randomised Study of Efficacy, Safety and Costs of Talc Pleurodesis Under Medical Thoracoscopy and Pleurodesis Under Video-assisted Thoracoscopy Surgery for Recurrent Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax
NCT00767962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema
NCT01246453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Rapid On Site Evaluation of Pleural Touch Preparations in Diagnosing Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients Undergoing Pleuroscopy
NCT03868579 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Medical Thoracoscopy Versus Simple Chest Tube Drainage in Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Pleural Empyema
NCT00234208 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3