Assessing the Efficacy of CARDIOgoniometry (CGM) to Determine Physiologically Significant Stenosis in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Comparison to Fractional FLOW Reserve - CARDIOFLOW
NCT02815631 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2022-08-18
Summary
The CARDIOFLOW study compares the standard test, a pressure wire test called fractional flow reserve (FFR), with a new method that is based on taking a detailed "3D" ECG called Cardiogoniometry (CGM).
FFR is an angiographic technique which measures the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis and trial data has shown that basing management decisions on this data improves prognosis. However FFR studies are expensive and invasive, whereas CGM is painless and simply involves placing 4 sticky pads to the patient's chest / back and is similar to an ECG (heart tracing). The investigators want to see whether we can use this new method to find out whether treatment with coronary angioplasty would be of benefit. If so, then in the future, clinicians could use this method (CGM) rather than pressure wire assessment (FFR). This would have several advantages; in particular, it can be easily performed in the clinic and avoids the need to use an expensive pressure wire.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Cardiogoniometry (CGM)
- DEVICE
-
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2016-09-30
- Completion
- 2016-10-01
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Computed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve vs. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio in Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
NCT07308496 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of CFD-based RuiXin-FFR by Comparing With Pressure-wire-based FFR
NCT04731285 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Analysis of Coronary CT Angiography to Identify Patients With Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
NCT02791113 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Validation of Stenosis Assessment by Coronary Artery Computed Tomography Against Invasive Measurements of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Significant Coronary Artery Stenoses
NCT00817102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of CFD-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography
NCT04814550 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of iFR vs FFR in Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT02166736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of FFRCT-angio in Functional Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis
NCT04493086 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Versus Instant Wave-Free Ratio (iFR)
NCT01559493 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Feasibility Evaluation of Planning and Execution of Surgical Revascularization Solely Based on Coronary CTA and FFRCT in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease (FASTTRACK CABG)
NCT04142021 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
FFR Versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance
NCT03033810 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Correlation of FFR CT With Invasive FFR in Multi-ethnic Cohort- a Retrospective Study
NCT06790836 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Implication of Coronary Artery Disease Burden and Pattern in Ischemia-causing Vessels With PCI
NCT04665466 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Routine Versus Selective Use of FFR to Guide PCI
NCT02000661 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Relationship Between Pressure and Flow Velocity on Coronary Physiology
NCT02330861 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Angiography-derived FFR GPS in Predicting Post-PCI Physiological and Clinical Outcomes
NCT05496023 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve (FFR) and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy (NIRS)
NCT02985112 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-FFR Compared to Invasive Coronar Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve
NCT03045601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of FFR in ACS Patients: Pressure ACS Registry
NCT05896501 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Vessel-FFR Versus FFR in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses
NCT03497637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
QUantitative Flow Ratio Or Angiography for the assessMent of nOn-culprit Lesions
NCT04808310 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance and Costs of FFRB Vs. Standard Care in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
NCT06681584 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Dual Energy CT for Ischemia Determination Compared to "Gold Standard" Non-Invasive and Invasive Techniques
NCT02178904 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Determination of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio by Computed Tomography
NCT01747031 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT01873560 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The REAL Registry for Utilization of iFR in Assessing Coronary Stenoses
NCT02281110 ·Status: COMPLETED