Ultrasound-Guided Landmark and Epidural Site Pain
NCT02813681 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2019-10-03
Summary
Historically, women who have chronic back pain after pregnancy have attributed the cause to the epidural procedure. While many studies have shown no greater incidence of generalized post-partum back pain in those who received an epidural, no studies have measured localized pressure sensitivity at the epidural insertion site. Short-term pressure sensitivity might limit patient's mobility and activities in the post-partum period. Understanding the factors that increase insertion site pressure sensitivity will allow the investigators to modify epidural placement technique in order to minimize this effect.
Conditions
- Back Pain
- Epidural Analgesia, Obstetric
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
US-epidural SVD
participants who received US examination prior to epidural placement. The purpose of this group is to determine if US derived landmarks reduce pressure sensitivity.
- PROCEDURE
-
US sham- epidural SVD
participants who received US examination process but with the monitor turned off. The purpose of this group is to determine if the standard of care epidural placement technique will increase pressure sensitivity at the insertion site. The purpose of this group will also be to reduce the placebo effect from the US exam and to maintain blinding of the patient to their group status (US epidural or US sham epidural).
- PROCEDURE
-
Spontaneous vaginal delivery without an Epidural
Spontaneous vaginal delivery without an Epidural The purpose of the control group is to serve as a baseline (or a measure of normal). The control participant's measurement will be compared to those that did receive treatments (either epidural alone or ultrasound and epidural). This information will tell the investigator how many women have back pain after spontaneous vaginal delivery. Participant must meet the inclusion requirements and not meet any of the exclusion requirements
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Denise Wilkes · UTMB
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-05-31
- Completion
- 2016-05-31
More Related Trials
-
3D Ultrasound-guided Labor Epidural Analgesia in the Morbid Obese Parturient
NCT03405311 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Maternal Postioning on Spread of Local Anesthetic After Epidural Analgesia
NCT02617823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Epidural vs. Dural Puncture Epidural in Labor Analgesia
NCT06849726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida
NCT06766812 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Epidural Loading Prior to Catheter Insertion
NCT02883283 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Predictors of Difficulty in Performing Epidural Anesthesia for Labor in Pregnant Patients.
NCT07056166 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Low Epidural Catheter Placement With Standard Epidural Catheter Placement
NCT01182220 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dural Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural Analgesia in Labor
NCT07278895 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3 Simple Questions to Predict Labor Pain and Epidural Analgesia Use in Parturients
NCT02824302 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Spinal Analgesia as Fast Track Painless Labor
NCT05271760 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of Analgesic Techniques on Duration of Spontaneously Laboring Patients
NCT01982838 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Analgesic Techniques on Duration of Labor for Induction Patients
NCT01982851 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
SKIN WHEAL - Subcutaneous or Intradermal Lidocaine in Epidural for Laboring Pain.
NCT06236126 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache in Postpartum Patients: Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block to Epidural Blood Patch.
NCT02962427 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Compared Efficacy of Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia With or Without Automatic Boluses
NCT03407209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Epidural, Combined and Dural Puncture Labor Epidural on Pain, and Course of Vaginal Delivery
NCT04290702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Relief Effects on Length of Labor
NCT01750099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsatile Pressure Waveform to Confirm Correct Placement of the Epidural in Laboring Patients
NCT02395796 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Intrathecal Catheter Placement Versus Resiting Epidural Catheter After Dural Puncture in Obstetric Patients
NCT05977361 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Intrapartum Ultrasound in Instrumental Delivery
NCT02899481 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia
NCT01708668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dural Puncture Epidural VS Standard Epidural on Physician Top-ups During Labour Analgesia
NCT04728048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacral Spread of Sensory Block After Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Compared With Epidural for Labour Analgesia
NCT05217134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Classic Epidural Analgesia in Labor
NCT04776512 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
NCT04234178 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA