MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness Comparison of Skin Micro-grafts vs Meshed Split Thickness Skin Grafts

NCT02813213 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2018-01-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, that compares the percentage of epithelialization of skin defects using the conventional meshed split thickness skin grafts vs skin micro grafts.

Two techniques will be applied in the same patient. The skin defect will be divided in two parts, and with a randomized method each half of this defect will be assigned to one of the two techniques.

Conditions

  • Skin Ulcer
  • Burns

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Skin micro Grafts

0.8 x 0.8 skin micro graft with graft to graft distance of 4 cm (1:50 expansion) bathed with keratinocyte growth factor solution ( 1.5 ml for each 14 square centimeters of wound)

PROCEDURE

Standard skin graft

Standard split thickness (0.3-0.5mm) skin graft

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-06-30
Primary Completion
2018-08-31
Completion
2018-09-30

Countries

  • Mexico

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02813213 on ClinicalTrials.gov