Trial Outcomes & Findings for Do Single Use Negative Pressure Dressings Reduce Wound Complications in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery (NCT NCT02799667)
NCT ID: NCT02799667
Last Updated: 2021-02-21
Results Overview
Composite outcome of wound complications, defined as the presence of any of the following: superficial, deep, and organ space surgical site infections (SSIs), skin blisters around the incision, scar separation \>1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital re-admission, and additional operating room management.
TERMINATED
NA
110 participants
2 weeks post partum/post operative period
2021-02-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
55
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
54
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Do Single Use Negative Pressure Dressings Reduce Wound Complications in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
Total
n=110 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
55 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=99 Participants
|
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=107 Participants
|
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
47 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
38 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
55 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
47.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=99 Participants
|
49.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=107 Participants
|
48.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
gestational age
|
36.4 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=99 Participants
|
37.4 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=107 Participants
|
36.9 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=206 Participants
|
|
gestational diabetes
|
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
pregestational diabetes
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
current smoker
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
former smoker
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
chronic steroid use
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Insulin use
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Oral Hypoglycemic agent use
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeks post partum/post operative periodComposite outcome of wound complications, defined as the presence of any of the following: superficial, deep, and organ space surgical site infections (SSIs), skin blisters around the incision, scar separation \>1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital re-admission, and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Outcome of the Presence of Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
|
14 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeks post partum/post operative periodThe presence of each the following individual wound complications will be analyzed as separate outcomes: superficial, deep, and organ space SSIs, skin blisters around the incision, scar separation \>1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital re-admission, and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
organ space SSI · no
|
55 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
skin blisters · yes
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
scar separation · yes
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
seroma w/evacuation · no
|
54 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
superficial SSI · yes
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
superficial SSI · no
|
49 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
deep SSI · yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
deep SSI · no
|
55 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
organ space SSI · yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
skin blisters · no
|
50 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
scar separation · no
|
50 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
seroma w/evacuation · yes
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
hematoma w/evacuation · yes
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
hematoma w/evacuation · no
|
55 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
wound debridement · yes
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
wound debridement · no
|
54 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
hospital readmission · yes
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
hospital readmission · no
|
54 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
additional operative room management · yes
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
additional operative room management · no
|
55 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeks post partum/post operative periodComposite outcome of the presence of one of the following major complications; deep incisional SSIs, scar separation \> 1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital readmission and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Outcome of the Presence of Severe Wound Complications Diagnosed by the Two Week Post Operative Appointment
|
11 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post partum/post operative periodComposite outcome of wound complications, defined as the presence of any of the following: superficial, deep, and organ space surgical site infections (SSIs), skin blisters around the incision, scar separation \>1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital re-admission, and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Outcome of the Presence of Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment, or Ascertained Through Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively.
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post partum/post operative periodThe presence of each the following individual wound complications will be analyzed as separate outcomes: superficial, deep, and organ space SSIs, skin blisters around the incision, scar separation \>1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital re-admission, and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
organ space SSI · yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
hospital readmission · no
|
54 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
superficial SSI · yes
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
superficial SSI · no
|
48 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
deep SSI · yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
deep SSI · no
|
55 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
organ space SSI · no
|
55 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
skin blisters · yes
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
skin blisters · no
|
50 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
scar separation · yes
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
scar separation · no
|
48 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
seroma w/evacuation · yes
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
seroma w/evacuation · no
|
54 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
hematoma w/evacuation · yes
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
hematoma w/evacuation · no
|
55 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
wound debridement · yes
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
wound debridement · no
|
54 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
hospital readmission · yes
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
additional operative room management · yes
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Individual Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Weeks Post Operatively
additional operative room management · no
|
55 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post partum/post operative periodComposite outcome of the presence of one of the following major complications; deep incisional SSIs, scar separation \> 1 cm, seroma requiring evacuation, hematoma requiring evacuation, wound debridement, hospital readmission and additional operating room management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the standard dressing (sterile gauze, non absorbent sterile gauze, and a waterproof bandage) at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Standard Dressing: Patients are randomized to the standard dressing at the time of fascial closure.
|
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
n=55 Participants
Women will be randomized to receive the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressing at the time of fascial closure in a cesarean delivery.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing: Patients are randomized to the NPWT at the time of fascial closure.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Outcome of the Presence of Severe Wound Complications Diagnosed at a Two Week Post Operative Appointment or Ascertained Via Patient Phone Calls at 2 and 6 Week Post Operatively
|
12 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Standard Dressing
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressing
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Ashley T. Peterson, MD, Study Coordinator
Tufts Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place