Trial Outcomes & Findings for RANKL-blockade for the Treatment of Erosive Osteoarthritis (OA) of Interphalangeal Finger Joints (NCT NCT02771860)
NCT ID: NCT02771860
Last Updated: 2024-09-25
Results Overview
The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
24 weeks
2024-09-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
46
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
RANKL-blockade for the Treatment of Erosive Osteoarthritis (OA) of Interphalangeal Finger Joints
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=51 Participants
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=49 Participants
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
42 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=99 Participants
|
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=107 Participants
|
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
51 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
|
25.3 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=99 Participants
|
25.3 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=107 Participants
|
25.3 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Number of radiographically affected joints
|
3.6 count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=99 Participants
|
4.0 count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=107 Participants
|
3.8 count
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Ghent University scoring system (GUSS) of all joints
|
249 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 66 • n=99 Participants
|
248 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67 • n=107 Participants
|
249 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Ghent University scoring system (GUSS) of target joints
|
155.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 69.3 • n=99 Participants
|
158.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.8 • n=107 Participants
|
157.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 58.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Pain
|
4.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=99 Participants
|
4.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=107 Participants
|
4.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis index, subscale pain
|
20.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=99 Participants
|
21.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=107 Participants
|
21.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis index, subscale function
|
41.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.9 • n=99 Participants
|
42.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.9 • n=107 Participants
|
41.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA)
|
10.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=99 Participants
|
10.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=107 Participants
|
10.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit)
The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=51 Participants
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=49 Participants
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) of Target Joints at Week 24
|
162.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.4
|
153.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 48 weeksPopulation: intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit)
These are the number of new erosive IP joints according to the Verbruggen and Veys anatomical scoring system amongst the pre-erosive joints (i.e., N, S, J joints) at 48 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=501 joints
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=535 joints
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of New Erosive Joints by Verbruggen and Veys at Week 48
|
9 joints
|
38 joints
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 48 weeksPopulation: intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit)
The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair, and negative changes with erosive progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=46 Participants
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=46 Participants
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) at Week 48
|
163.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.9
|
149.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.9
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 48 weeksNumber of patients who have experienced one or more (serious) adverse events throughout the study
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
Comparator - Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=51 participants at risk
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=49 participants at risk
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Major cardiovascular event
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical and medical procedures
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal complaints
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab
n=51 participants at risk
51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
Comparator - Placebo
n=49 participants at risk
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
51.0%
26/51 • Number of events 41 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
44.9%
22/49 • Number of events 38 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal event
|
9.8%
5/51 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
12.2%
6/49 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical and medical procedures
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal complaints
|
37.3%
19/51 • Number of events 24 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
49.0%
24/49 • Number of events 34 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders (incl. dizziness, vertigo, headache)
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
22.4%
11/49 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary and respiratory complaintes (non-infectious)
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash and skin problmes
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy (systemic and urticaria)
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
General disorders
Theet problems
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
|
General disorders
Other
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
18.4%
9/49 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place