Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Comparing Blue Light Imaging (BLI) With Flexible Spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) (NCT NCT02755285)
NCT ID: NCT02755285
Last Updated: 2020-06-04
Results Overview
Likert score ratings of image quality for Blue Light Imaging (BLI), Blue Light Imaging-bright (BLI-brt) and Flexible spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) images. Each BLI and BLI-Brt setting was compared to FICE, to determine which settings were equivalent to FICE. Likert Score Scale: 1. Not seen; 2. poor but usable, characteristic features are detectable but details are not fully reproduced; features just visible; 3. good; allows an adequate assessment, details of anatomical structures are visible but not necessarily clearly defined; details emerging; 4. very good; allows an excellent assessment, anatomical details are clearly defined; details clear This was a blinded and randomized Reader assessment of all BLI and FICE images.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
Two to three months
2020-06-04
Participant Flow
Subjects enrolled had been referred to Mayo Clinic for clinically indicated gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy between August 19, 2016 and September 7, 2016.
Each subject underwent a complete diagnostic endoscopy examination with white light, followed by an exam with BLI (BLI + BLI-brt) and FICE, at 3 FICE settings (1,2 \& 6). Each subject could contribute up to 2 anatomical sites (regions of interest).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Single Endoscopy Procedure
All subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
Single Endoscopy Procedure: All subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study Comparing Blue Light Imaging (BLI) With Flexible Spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Single Endoscopy Procedure
n=20 Participants
All subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
Single Endoscopy Procedure: All subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.6 years
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Two to three monthsPopulation: All patients had imaging done with white light (standard) as well as BLI, BLI-brt, and FICE. Each of the three (3) Readers had a unique set of randomized images which they reviewed independently during the reader study.
Likert score ratings of image quality for Blue Light Imaging (BLI), Blue Light Imaging-bright (BLI-brt) and Flexible spectral-Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) images. Each BLI and BLI-Brt setting was compared to FICE, to determine which settings were equivalent to FICE. Likert Score Scale: 1. Not seen; 2. poor but usable, characteristic features are detectable but details are not fully reproduced; features just visible; 3. good; allows an adequate assessment, details of anatomical structures are visible but not necessarily clearly defined; details emerging; 4. very good; allows an excellent assessment, anatomical details are clearly defined; details clear This was a blinded and randomized Reader assessment of all BLI and FICE images.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Endoscopy Procedure
n=20 Participants
All subjects will have 1 endoscopy procedure, in which they will have a white light examination followed by FICE and BLI imaging on a maximum of two (2) anatomical sites per subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale
BLI
|
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale
BLI-brt
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
|
Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale
FICE Setting 1
|
3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
|
Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale
FICE Setting 2
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
|
Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale
FICE Setting 6
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
Adverse Events
Single Endoscopy Procedure
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place