MedTrace Logo

Ultrasonography vs Cole Formula to Predict Endotracheal Tube Diameter

NCT02754531 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2017-03-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurement between ultrasonography and Cole formula in predicting uncuffed endotracheal tube diameter.

Conditions

  • General Anesthesia

Interventions

DEVICE

USG

USG used was SonoSite® M-Turbo Bothell, WA, USA, probe linear (Array HFL 38 frekuensi 6-13 MHz). Internal subglottic diameter equals external diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube or trachea diameter, result rounded to the smallest uncuffed endotracheal tube size.

OTHER

Cole Formula

Internal diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube equals (age in years/4) + 4mm.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Indonesia University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Aida R Tantri, Consultant · Indonesia University

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
6 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-05-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-31
Completion
2016-07-31

Countries

  • Indonesia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02754531 on ClinicalTrials.gov