Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Incremental Impact of AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary (VALUE) (NCT NCT02750800)
NCT ID: NCT02750800
Last Updated: 2019-11-06
Results Overview
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
COMPLETED
427 participants
Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
2019-11-06
Participant Flow
Full Analysis Set: participants who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and received at least one dose of adalimumab
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0
Adalimumab administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for 12 months according to the approved EMA label and Hungarian financial protocols and supportive services via the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
412
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
314
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
98
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0
Adalimumab administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for 12 months according to the approved EMA label and Hungarian financial protocols and supportive services via the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator decision
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
Patient request
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Other, not specified
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=76 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=62 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=69 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=75 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=67 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=63 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
Total
n=412 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33 • n=76 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.10 • n=61 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.24 • n=69 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29 • n=75 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 • n=67 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52 • n=62 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.00 • n=410 Participants • Missing data for one participant with Crohn's disease and one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=76 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
31 Participants
n=62 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
22 Participants
n=69 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
34 Participants
n=75 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
53 Participants
n=67 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
27 Participants
n=62 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
196 Participants
n=411 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=76 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
31 Participants
n=62 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
47 Participants
n=69 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
41 Participants
n=75 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
14 Participants
n=67 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
35 Participants
n=62 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
215 Participants
n=411 Participants • Missing data for one participant with ulcerative colitis
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=60 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=51 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=55 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=48 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=44 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months
|
11.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.24
|
7.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
4.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.14
|
12.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.73
|
11.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
9.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=60 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=51 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=55 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=48 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=44 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months
|
9.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.31
|
10.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.87
|
6.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.25
|
8.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.63
|
5.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
11.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the five dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score. The range for the EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 with '0' defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health. The higher the score the better the health status. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=59 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=48 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=55 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=56 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=54 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=46 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months
|
0.185 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.169 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.084 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.203 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.152 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.123 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Participants rated their health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints were labelled 100, "The best health you can imagine"and 0, "The worst health you can imagine". Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=59 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=48 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=55 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=56 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=55 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=44 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months
|
18.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.23
|
22.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.65
|
11.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.50
|
29.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.52
|
22.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.82
|
25.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and evaluable data
The SIBDQ is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire, able to detect and define meaningful clinical changes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) participants by measuring physical, social and emotional status. The SIBDQ consists of 10 questions; each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor QOL) to 7 (optimum QOL). A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Total scores range from 10 (poor QoL) to 70 (good QoL). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=49 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=46 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
|
11.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
16.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis and evaluable data
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a self-reported questionnaire for capturing psychosocial effects of chronic skin disease on different areas of life within the previous seven days. The ten questions cover six areas: symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationship, effects of treatment on daily life. Total DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with 0 corresponding to the best quality of life and 30 to the worst. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=55 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis
|
-8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
-5.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.93
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either ankylosing spondylitis and or psoriatic arthritis with axial symptoms and evaluable data
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with AS. Participants answer yes/no to 18 items assessing the current impact of AS on their quality of life status. The total score ranges from 0 to 18, with lower scores representing better AS-specific quality of life. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=58 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=19 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms
|
-6.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
-6.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version 1.4 is an instrument to show that adherence is expected to be related with participants' satisfaction with therapy and that such satisfaction can be a function of not only the effect of the treatment, but also the services offered. TSQM responses are used to derive scores for scales measuring effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction (based on participant evaluation over the last 2 to 3 weeks, or since last medication use). Scores for each of the 4 scales range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better state or outcome (e.g., greater perceived effectiveness or satisfaction). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=48 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=49 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=44 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=39 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=43 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
Effectiveness
|
7.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.8
|
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.0
|
4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.3
|
6.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.0
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.1
|
15.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 41.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
Convenience
|
10.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
10.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.5
|
9.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.5
|
8.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
7.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
14.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
Global satisfaction
|
7.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
7.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.2
|
9.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
5.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.9
|
11.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
Side effects
|
2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.5
|
9.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.3
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
5.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
11.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
11.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) assesses whether an individual has received enough information about a range of topics relating to prescribed medication. Participants are asked to rate the amount of information they have received using the following response scale: "too much", "about right", "too little", "none received", "none needed". Total satisfaction rating is obtained by summing the scores for each item. If the participant is satisfied that he/she has received a particular aspect of medication information (with a rating of "about right" or "none needed"), this is given a score of 1. If the participant is dissatisfied with the amount of information received (with a rating of "too much", "too little", or "none received"), this is scored 0. Total scores range from 0 to 17 with high scores indicating a high degree of overall satisfaction with the amount of medication information received. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=55 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=45 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=49 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=49 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=46 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=45 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMAS-4 ) is a 4-item self-reported measure of medication-taking behavior. It measures intentional and non-intentional non-adherence. The MMAS-4 score is the sum of four questions and ranges from 0 to 4: The coding is 0, 1 (low adherence), 2, 3 (moderate adherence) and 4 (high adherence). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=57 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=50 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=51 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=50 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=44 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months
|
0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
-0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included
The WPAI-SHP is a questionnaire used to assess the effect of the participant's health problems on their ability to work and perform regular activities. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems. Total work productivity impairment (TWPI) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=60 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=49 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=54 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=53 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=54 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=46 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
Presenteeism
|
-30.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.2
|
-20.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.7
|
-19.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.0
|
-35.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
-33.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.2
|
-13.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
Absenteeism
|
-5.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.4
|
-16.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.8
|
-4.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
-9.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.5
|
-8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.8
|
-10.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 44.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
Total activity impairment
|
-30.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.0
|
-14.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.7
|
-18.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
-34.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.9
|
-33.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.7
|
-24.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
Total work productivity impairment
|
-4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
|
-3.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
-3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included
The number of hospital inpatient days over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment hospital inpatient days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leave days (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment sick leave days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=72 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=62 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=67 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=71 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=65 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=58 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days
Number of sick leave days
|
-5.10 days
Standard Deviation 15.37
|
-0.91 days
Standard Deviation 32.37
|
-1.55 days
Standard Deviation 7.14
|
-1.16 days
Standard Deviation 8.00
|
-22.00 days
Standard Deviation 82.81
|
-6.68 days
Standard Deviation 37.29
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days
Number of hospital inpatient days
|
-2.56 days
Standard Deviation 11.93
|
-5.00 days
Standard Deviation 17.36
|
-1.25 days
Standard Deviation 6.00
|
-3.75 days
Standard Deviation 18.41
|
-3.68 days
Standard Deviation 15.32
|
-2.91 days
Standard Deviation 9.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data; participants who were employed with available data at baseline and 12 months are included
The number of hospitalizations over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total hospitalizations were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leaves (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total sick leaves were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=72 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=62 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=67 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=71 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=65 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=58 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves
Number of hospitalizations
|
-0.28 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.06 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.97
|
-0.18 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.15 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.35 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
-0.45 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves
Number of sick leaves
|
-0.58 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-1.19 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.30
|
-0.20 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.05 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-1.81 occurrences
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
-0.54 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)Population: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data. Data were not collected for visits to physiatrists and physiotherapists in the Psoriasis Arm/Group, and for visits to physiatrists in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Arm/Group.
The number of outpatient visits to general practitioners, immune-mediated inflammatory disease specialists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, physiatrists, physiotherapists, and nurses over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total outpatient visits were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=72 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=58 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=62 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=73 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=61 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=53 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Nurse
|
-0.98 occurrences
Standard Deviation 3.30
|
-1.75 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.73
|
-0.11 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.96 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
-1.09 occurrences
Standard Deviation 3.64
|
0.00 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
General practitioner
|
-4.32 occurrences
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
-4.35 occurrences
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
-2.97 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.18
|
-3.41 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.47
|
-5.06 occurrences
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
-3.68 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Immune-mediated inflammatory disease specialist
|
-2.02 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.45
|
-5.97 occurrences
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
-2.93 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
-1.60 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
-2.76 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.90
|
-3.53 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Ophthalmologist
|
-0.35 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
0.18 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
-0.44 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
0.02 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.15 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.15 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Gastroenterologist
|
-0.40 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
-6.83 occurrences
Standard Deviation 7.33
|
-0.33 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.14 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.13 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-5.45 occurrences
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Dermatologist
|
0.13 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-0.06 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
-5.71 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.41
|
-0.93 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
-0.02 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.26 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Rheumatologist
|
-6.18 occurrences
Standard Deviation 6.06
|
-0.35 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
-1.16 occurrences
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
-5.36 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.90
|
-7.96 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
0.15 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Physiatrist
|
-0.04 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
0.06 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
—
|
-0.09 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
—
|
0.16 occurrences
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Physiotherapist
|
-0.33 occurrences
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
1.18 occurrences
Standard Deviation 4.85
|
—
|
-0.75 occurrences
Standard Deviation 5.20
|
-1.49 occurrences
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
0.00 occurrences
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either psoriatic arthritis with peripheral symptoms or rheumatoid arthritis and evaluable data
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale \[VAS\] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score \>5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \<3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \<2.6 indicates clinical remission. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=42 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=56 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months
|
-3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with either ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis with axial symptoms and evaluable data
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) tool is a self-administered questionnaire/objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire assesses disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and duration of morning stiffness on a numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of ≥2 hours). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and ESR) are combined to yield a score (0 to no defined upper limit). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=53 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=5 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
-2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with Crohn's disease and evaluable data
The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a research tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease. Participants were asked to record the frequency of stools, abdominal pain and general well-being on a daily basis. In addition to the diary data, the investigator assessed the following for the calculation of CDAI: presence of complications (arthritis/arthralgia, iritis/uveitis, erythema nodosum/pyoderma gangrenosum/aphthous stomatitis, anal fissure/fistula/abscess, other fistula, and fever), the use of antidiarrheal medicines, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. The CDAI is the sum of the products of each item multiplied by a weighting factor and generally ranges from 0 up to 600, where remission of Crohn's disease is defined as CDAI \< 150, and severe disease is defined as CDAI \> 450. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=48 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 Months
|
-174.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 95.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with ulcerative colitis and evaluable data
The Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=45 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 Months
|
-4.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with psoriasis and evaluable data
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs. The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher the total score, the more severe the disease. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=56 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 Months
|
-16.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
All participants enrolled in the study were enrolled in the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support (PSP) program. Participants rated the PSP program as either "Very good", "good", "less satisfying" or "I do not use the services" at the last study visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=62 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=50 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=54 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=56 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=50 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
n=45 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
Good
|
20 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
Very good
|
39 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
Less Satisfying
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
I do not use the services
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 monthsPopulation: All participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data
To define possible correlations between disease activity scores and disease specific quality of life scores, correlation analyses were performed. Correlation between patient socio-demographics, patient type and indication was not completed because these were uninterpretable per protocol. ASQoL= Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire ASDAS(ESR) = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) DAS28(ESR)= Disease Activity Score 28; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR) SIBDQ= Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire CDAI= Clinical Disease Activity Index DLQI= Dermatology Life Quality Index PASI= Psoriasis Area and Severity Index pMayo= Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ankylosing Spondylitis
n=54 Participants
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis
|
Crohn's Disease
n=45 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease
|
Psoriasis
n=55 Participants
Participants with psoriasis
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
n=13 Participants
Participants with psoriatic arthritis
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
n=46 Participants
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis
|
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
ASQoL - ASDAS(ESR)
|
-0.213 correlation coefficient
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
ASQoL - DAS28(ESR)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0.132 correlation coefficient
|
—
|
—
|
|
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
SIBDQ - CDAI
|
—
|
-0.138 correlation coefficient
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
DLQI - PASI
|
—
|
—
|
0.323 correlation coefficient
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
SIBDQ - pMayo
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
-0.453 correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline (Month 0) to 12 monthsPopulation: Assessment of the effectiveness of the length of PSP exposure on participant outcomes was not possible because of the low number of participants in the non-PSP group.
The effectiveness of the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient care support program (PSP) on participant outcomes was to be analyzed by applying mixed linear models on outcomes including PSP utilization (continuous vs terminated) as fixed variables. Baseline participant outcome values were also to be included in the model.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0
n=412 participants at risk
Adalimumab administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for 12 months according to the approved EMA label and Hungarian financial protocols and supportive services via the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIOPULMONARY FAILURE
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ANAL FISTULA
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS ULCERATIVE
|
0.73%
3/412 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
CROHN'S DISEASE
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
General disorders
DEATH
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
ERYSIPELAS
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
CACHEXIA
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
B-CELL LYMPHOMA
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
BREAST CANCER
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA OF THE SKIN
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
RECTAL CANCER
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PSORIASIS
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
HOSPITALIZATION
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
TONSILLECTOMY
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
SYNCOPE
|
0.24%
1/412 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 62 weeks).
TESAEs were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant. Nonserious adverse events were not collected in this study.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER