Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Oral Hygiene & Root Resorption During Orthodontic Treatment (NCT NCT02745626)

NCT ID: NCT02745626

Last Updated: 2017-03-10

Results Overview

A measure of the plaque levels on the desired tooth surface. The following scores were used: 0 no plaque/debris on inspection and probing 1. thin film of plaque only visible after probing 2. ribbon-like layer of plaque covering the sulcus \& gingival crown areas but not filling interdental space 3. thick layer of plaque already visible at inspection and filling interdental space

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

68 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

Results posted on

2017-03-10

Participant Flow

Recruitment period: December 2011 - March 2014. Location: Orthodontic Clinic, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington , CT

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Overall Study
STARTED
24
22
22
Overall Study
COMPLETED
21
16
19
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
6
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of Oral Hygiene & Root Resorption During Orthodontic Treatment

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Total
n=56 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
16.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=99 Participants
14.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=107 Participants
14.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 • n=206 Participants
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
n=99 Participants
16 participants
n=107 Participants
19 participants
n=206 Participants
56 participants
n=7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

A measure of the plaque levels on the desired tooth surface. The following scores were used: 0 no plaque/debris on inspection and probing 1. thin film of plaque only visible after probing 2. ribbon-like layer of plaque covering the sulcus \& gingival crown areas but not filling interdental space 3. thick layer of plaque already visible at inspection and filling interdental space

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Plaque Index
T0 (premolar)
0.5 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.7 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.7 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
Plaque Index
T1(premolar)
0.8 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
1.4 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
1.3 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
Plaque Index
T2(premolar)
0.9 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.1 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.2 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
Plaque Index
T0(incisor)
0.6 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.7 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.9 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.9
Plaque Index
T1 (incisor)
1 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.2 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
1.5 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 1.0
Plaque Index
T2 (incisor)
0.9 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
1.5 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.6 Plaque Index (PI)
Standard Deviation 0.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

An evaluation of the gingival architecture . The following scores were used : 0 Physiologic gingiva 1. Mild inflammation (slight color change and little change in texture) 2. Moderate inflammation (moderate glazing, redness, edema and hypertrophy, bleeding on probing) 3. Severe inflammation (marked redness and hypertrophy, ulceration. tendency to bleed spontaneously)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Gingival Index
T0 (premolar)
0.4 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.3
0.1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.2
Gingival Index
T1 (premolar)
0.5 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.2 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
Gingival Index
T2 (premolar)
0.8 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
1.1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
Gingival Index
T0 (incisor)
0.6 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.4 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.4 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
Gingival Index
T1 (incisor)
0.8 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
1.2 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
1.5 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
Gingival Index
T2 (incisor)
1.1 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.5
1.7 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
1.5 Gingival Index (GI)
Standard Deviation 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

An evaluation of the amount of inflammation. The following scores were used: 0 no bleeding 1. singular bleeding point 2. several bleeding points or a thin bleeding line along the marginal gingiva 3. bleeding in the entire interdental gingival triangle immediately after probing 4. profuse bleeding during probing, bleeding extending over the marginal gingiva eventually with development of blood drops

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Bleeding Index
T0 (premolar)
0.5 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.6 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.6 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
Bleeding Index
T1 (premolar)
0.6 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
1.4 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1.2
1.3 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1.0
Bleeding Index
T2(Premolar)
0.5 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.7 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1.1
0.8 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.1
Bleeding Index
T0 (incisor)
0.7 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.9 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1
0.8 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1
Bleeding Index
T1 (incisor)
0.5 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.6
1.1 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1
1.2 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.9
Bleeding Index
T2 (incisor)
0.5 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 0.8
1.6 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1.2
1.3 Bleeding index (BI)
Standard Deviation 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

To calculate the bacterial counts from the diluted plates back to baseline undiluted values, the measurement obtained from the diluted plate was multiplied by 10n (n = number of the serial dilution).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Total Bacterial Count
T0
7.9 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 13.8
4.7 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 15.8
4.4 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 7.8
Total Bacterial Count
T1
6 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 9.9
32.7 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 92.4
10.9 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 18.1
Total Bacterial Count
T2
10.6 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 14.7
9.6 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 11.2
14.8 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0: Before treatment; T1: 9 months of treatment; T2: 18 months of treatment

To calculate the bacterial counts from the diluted plates back to baseline undiluted values, the measurement obtained from the diluted plate was multiplied by 10n (n = number of the serial dilution)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
S.Mutans Count
T0
0.8 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 3.7
1 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 2.1
1.1 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 2.1
S.Mutans Count
T1
0.5 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 2
0.8 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 2.0
1.6 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 6.5
S.Mutans Count
T2
0.2 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.5 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 1.2
9.9 CFU/ml
Standard Deviation 1.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0-T2: 18 months of treatment

Root resorption was analyzed by comparing the root length before (T0) treatment and after 18 months of treatment( T2). Therefore the data values indicate the difference in the root length ( in mm).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Amount of Root Resorption Observed for Maxillary Lateral Incisor = Length of Root at T0-Length of Root at T2 (in mm)
0.3 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.4
0.9 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.8 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: T0-T2: 18 months of treatment

Root resorption was analyzed by comparing the root length before (T0) treatment and after 18 months of treatment( T2)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clear Aligner Appliance
n=21 Participants
Clear Aligners, Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, California Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Self-ligating Appliance
n=16 Participants
Carriere Self-Ligating Bracket, Carlsbad, CA Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Conventional Bracket Appliance
n=19 Participants
Preadjusted edge wise brackets using elastomeric ties. Appliance: Orthodontic appliance to carry out orthodontic tooth movement.
Amount of Root Resorption Observed for Maxillary Second Premolar = Length of Root at T0-Length of Root at T2 (in mm)
0.17 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.1
0.16 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.21 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.13

Adverse Events

Clear Aligner Appliance

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Self-ligating Appliance

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Conventional Bracket Appliance

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Madhur Upadhyay, Director Orthodontic Clinic, Assistant Professor

University of Connecticut Health

Phone: 860-679-3729

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place