MedTrace Logo

Trial Outcomes & Findings for Peer Mentoring in Promoting Follow-up Care Self-Management in Younger Childhood Cancer Survivors (NCT NCT02699996)

NCT ID: NCT02699996

Last Updated: 2022-10-19

Results Overview

Descriptive analyses will be used to evaluate expected enrollment (\> 50%), retention (\> 80%), and completion of intervention sessions (\> 75%).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

31 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 weeks

Results posted on

2022-10-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Overall Study
STARTED
20
11
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
9
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
5
2

Baseline Characteristics

Peer Mentoring in Promoting Follow-up Care Self-Management in Younger Childhood Cancer Survivors

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=20 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
n=11 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Total
n=31 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
31 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
17 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
27 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
n=99 Participants
11 participants
n=107 Participants
31 participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Population: Group Intervention Participants: the total number of potential participants identified by the Cancer Registry, whose contact information was provided to our study team for recruitment. Group Intervention Mentors-identified and recommended by the local survivorship clinic physicians and clinical staff.

Descriptive analyses will be used to evaluate expected enrollment (\> 50%), retention (\> 80%), and completion of intervention sessions (\> 75%).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=36 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
n=11 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Study Enrollment Rates · Eligible on study
20 Participants
11 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Study Enrollment Rates · Ineligible
8 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Study Enrollment Rates · Declined participation/No time
1 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Study Enrollment Rates · Unable to reach
7 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Reason Study Drop Out · Eligible on study
0 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Reason Study Drop Out · Ineligible
0 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Reason Study Drop Out · Declined participation/No time
1 Participants
2 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Reason Study Drop Out · Unable to reach
4 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Participant Retention Rates · Eligible on study
15 Participants
9 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Participant Retention Rates · Ineligible
0 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Participant Retention Rates · Declined participation/No time
1 Participants
2 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Participant Retention Rates · Unable to reach
4 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Adherence to Sessions · Eligible on study
15 Participants
9 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Adherence to Sessions · Ineligible
0 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Adherence to Sessions · Declined participation/No time
0 Participants
0 Participants
Feasibility as Measured by Study Enrollment Rates, Retention Rates, Adherence to the Intervention, and Reasons for Study Drop Out.
Adherence to Sessions · Unable to reach
0 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (post-intervention)

Population: Satisfaction with intervention, administered to all Participants, i.e., Group Intervention Participants, n=15.

1. General Satisfaction: Average of each item reported separately. 1: Program; 2: Online educational materials; 3: Discussion with mentor; 4: Frequency of calls; 5: Program duration; 6: Material read. Items 1, 2, 3, \& 6 are rated on a 1 "not at all" to 5 "very" scale (higher=higher satisfaction). Item 4 uses a 1 "not frequent enough" to 3 "too frequent" scale. Item 5 uses a 1 "way too short" to 5 "way too long" scale. 2. 12-items adapted from Internet Intervention Utility Questionnaire; measures perceived usefulness on 1 "not at all" to 5 "very" scale, higher=higher usefulness. Average total score reported. 3. 16-item Impact Questionnaire measures perceived effectiveness in improving targeted skills using 1 "not at all" to 5 "very" scale (higher=greater perceived effectiveness). Average total score reported. 4. 6-item Adherence Questionnaire measures barriers to engagement using 1 "not a problem" to 3 "major problem" scale. (higher=bigger barrier). Average total score reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Satisfaction w/Online materials [Range 1-5]
3.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Satisfaction w/Discussions [Range 1-5]
4.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Frequency of calls [Range 1-3; 2="Just right"]
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Program duration [Range 1-5;3="Just right"]
3.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Amount of ed materials read [Range 1-5]
3.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Internet Utility Total Score [Range 1-5]
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Impact Questionnaire Total Score [Range 1-5]
3.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Adherence Questionnaire Total [Range 1-3]
1.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
—
Satisfaction With Intervention, Measured by 1) General Satisfaction, 2) Intervention Utility Questionnaire, 3) Impact Questionnaire (i.e., Effectiveness), and 4) Adherence Questionnaire ( i.e., Barriers to Engagement).
Satisfaction w/Program [Range 1-5]
4.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
—

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Time of enrollment, after completing mentor training.

Population: Mentors completed satisfaction with training questionnaire after completion of the Mentor Training and prior to being matched with a participant (mentee).

Mentor 6-item Training Satisfaction measured on a scale from 1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "strongly agree" (higher score=high satisfaction). Administered to Group Intervention Mentors only. Total average score is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=11 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Mentor Training Satisfaction
3.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: All participants who completed baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment.

Respondents rate how responsible they are for various healthcare tasks on a 4-point scale, where 1= "not responsible at all", and 4= "almost always responsible." The Adolescent Responsibility Scale is calculated by averaging responses across all 10 items (RTQ-Survivor). A single item assessing "overall readiness to assume complete responsibility for health care" on the same 4-point scale is analyzed separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version
RTQ-Survivor Adolescent Responsibility pre-
3.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version
RTQ-Survivor Adolescent Responsibility post-
3.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version
RTQ-Overall Readiness pre-
2.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version
RTQ-Overall Readiness post-
3.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: Participants who completed baseline, intervention, and follow-up.

The Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) yields six sub-scale scores: Knowledge, Skills/Self-Efficacy, Beliefs/Expectations, Goals/Motivation, Relationship/Communication, and Psychosocial/Emotional. Total average score is reported across all sub-scales (TRI-total), as well as each sub-scale total score. Scores are averaged across items on a 5-point scale from 1 "not at all" to 5 "extremely" or "always," with higher scores indicating better functioning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI-total pre-
4.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI-total post-
4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Knowledge pre-
4.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Knowledge post-
4.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Skills/Self-Efficacy pre-
3.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Skills/Self-Efficacy post-
4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Beliefs/Expectations pre-
3.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Beliefs/Expectations post-
4.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Goals/Motivation pre-
4.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Goals/Motivation post-
4.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Relationship/Communication pre-
4.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Relationship/Communication post-
4.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Psychosocial/Emotional pre-
3.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
—
Transition Readiness, as Measured by the Transition Readiness Inventory (Phase 2).
TRI Psychosocial/Emotional post-
3.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: We had missing data for one participant, therefore total number of participants analyzed is 14.

Respondents report symptoms on a 5-point rating scale from 1 "never" to 5 "always" in the past 7 days, with higher scores indicating higher levels of negative affect. A total raw summary score is calculated and then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=14 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Symptoms of Depression, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short-Form (v1.0 8b).
Depression pre-
52.66 T-score
Standard Deviation 12.15
—
Symptoms of Depression, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short-Form (v1.0 8b).
Depression post-
51.02 T-score
Standard Deviation 9.63
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Respondents report symptoms on a 5-point rating scale from 1 "never" to 5 "always" in the past 7 days, with higher scores indicating higher levels of negative affect. A total raw summary score is calculated and then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Symptoms of Anxiety, as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety Short-Form (v1.0 8a)
Anxiety pre-
59.29 T-score
Standard Deviation 14.20
—
Symptoms of Anxiety, as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety Short-Form (v1.0 8a)
Anxiety post-
57.55 T-score
Standard Deviation 7.97
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: Participants

This 4-item scale is measuring cancer-related worries (i.e., recurrence of cancer, future diagnostic tests, cancer coming back, other type of cancer). A total score is calculated by averaging across items on a 5-point scale (from 1="Strongly disagree" to 5="Strongly agree"), with higher scores indicating greater worry. Total average score is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Cancer Related Worry Scale
Cancer Related Worry pre-
3.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
—
Cancer Related Worry Scale
Cancer Related Worry post-
3.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: Participants

Perseverance is measured via the The Short Grit Scale, an 8-item measure of perseverance for long-term goals. A total scale score is calculated by averaging across all items, on a 5-point scale (from 1 "not at all like me" to 5 "very much like me"), with higher scores indicating greater perseverance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Short Grit Scale
Grit pre-
3.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
—
Short Grit Scale
Grit post-
3.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to up to 6 weeks

Population: Participants

The three subscales measure perceptions of cancer impact on Body Health (8 items), Personal Growth (5 items), and Memory Problems (4 items). Sub-scales are scored by averaging across items using a 5-point scale (where 1="not at all", and 5="very much"), with higher scores indicating greater impact.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Body Health pre-
3.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
—
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Body Health post-
3.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
—
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Personal Growth pre-
4.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
—
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Personal Growth post-
4.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
—
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Memory pre-
3.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
—
Impact of Cancer, as Measured by Three Subscales of the Impact of Cancer - Childhood Cancer Survivors Scale
Memory post-
3.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
—

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

Barriers to follow-up care \& adherence evaluated by insurance status, current provider, and other barriers to care using 6 items from the Follow-Up Care Use and Health Outcomes of Cancer Survivors (FOCUS). Participants report on appointments, cancer screening, and other adherence markers on a 5-point scale (from 1="Strongly disagree" to 5="Strongly agree"), where higher score indicates grater barrier. Total average score is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group Intervention Participants
n=15 Participants
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Group Intervention Mentors
one arm, all participants complete 6 week self-management (5 online educational modules) + peer mentoring (6 video-conference or phone calls) intervention.
Barriers to Follow-up Care & Adherence
Barriers pre-
2.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
—
Barriers to Follow-up Care & Adherence
Barriers post-
2.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
—

Adverse Events

Group Intervention Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group Intervention Mentors

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Katie Devine

Rutgers Cancer Inst. of NJ

Phone: 7322357549

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place