Trial Outcomes & Findings for Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors (NCT NCT02697214)
NCT ID: NCT02697214
Last Updated: 2019-02-11
Results Overview
The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of four popular, commercially available wrist-worn heart rate monitors compared to the current gold standard of a ECG using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
20 minutes
2019-02-11
Participant Flow
All 50 subjects wore 4 monitors each. i.e. EKG, H7 polar monitor, and 2 other randomly assigned heart rate monitors.
Unit of analysis: Heart Rate monitors
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Apple Watch
Participants wore Polar H7 chest monitor, standard ECG and Apple Watch and one other wrist monitor.
|
Fitbit Charge HR
Participants wore Polar H7 chest monitor, standard ECG and Fitbit Charge HR and one other wrist monitor.
|
Mio Fuse
Participants wore Polar H7 chest monitor, standard ECG and Mio Fuse and one other wrist monitor.
|
Basis Peak
Participants wore Polar H7 chest monitor and Basis Peak and one other wrist monitor.
|
Polar HR
All participants wore Polar HR chest monitor
|
Standard ECG
All participants wore standard ECG
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
Heart Rate at 2mph
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
Heart Rate at 3mph
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
Heart Rate at 4mph
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
Heart Rate at 6mph
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26 26
|
25 25
|
25 25
|
24 24
|
50 50
|
50 50
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Apple Watch
n=26 Heart Rate Monitors
Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
Apple Watch: Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
|
Fitbit Charge HR
n=25 Heart Rate Monitors
Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
Fitbit Charge HR: Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
|
Mio Fuse
n=25 Heart Rate Monitors
Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
Mio Fuse: Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
|
Basis Peak
n=24 Heart Rate Monitors
Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
Basis Peak: Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
|
Total
n=100 Heart Rate Monitors
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<=18 years
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
|
26 participants
n=99 Participants
|
25 participants
n=107 Participants
|
25 participants
n=206 Participants
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
19 participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 participants
n=206 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
7 participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 participants
n=206 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
26 participants
n=99 Participants • As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
|
25 participants
n=107 Participants • As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
|
25 participants
n=206 Participants • As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants • As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
|
50 participants
n=31 Participants • As each participant was assigned to wear two wrist-worn heart rate monitors.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 20 minutesPopulation: All participants are represented in the analysis population.
The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of four popular, commercially available wrist-worn heart rate monitors compared to the current gold standard of a ECG using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apple Watch
n=26 Heart Rate Monitors
Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
Apple Watch: Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device.
|
Fitbit Charge HR
n=25 Heart Rate Monitors
Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
Fitbit Charge HR: Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device.
|
Mio Fuse
n=25 Heart Rate Monitors
Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
Mio Fuse: Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device.
|
Basis Peak
n=24 Heart Rate Monitors
Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
Basis Peak: Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors.
|
.91 Correlation Coefficient
Interval 0.884 to 0.929
|
.84 Correlation Coefficient
Interval 0.791 to 0.872
|
.91 Correlation Coefficient
Interval 0.882 to 0.929
|
.83 Correlation Coefficient
Interval 0.779 to 0.865
|
Adverse Events
Apple Watch
Fitbit Charge HR
Mio Fuse
Basis Peak
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place