Trial Outcomes & Findings for TRIple in asthMA With uncontRolled pAtient on Medium streNgth of ICS + LABA (NCT NCT02676076)
NCT ID: NCT02676076
Last Updated: 2026-06-26
Results Overview
Change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 was analysed at Week 26 of treatment. FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the first second
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1155 participants
Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26.
2026-06-26
Participant Flow
Overall, 1628 patients were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria; of these,1155 patients were randomised. Overall, 5 patients were randomised in error and did not start treatment (N=3 patients in the CHF 5993 pMDI 100/6/12.5 μg group and N=2 patients in the CHF 1535 pMDI 100/6 μg group). The data set Safety population, used for the evaluations represents 1150 patients.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
579
|
576
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
542
|
539
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
37
|
37
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse event, serious fatal
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Asthma exacerbation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
22
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
7
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Unknown Reason not specified
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Row population differs from the 'Overall' number of subjects because only ex-smokers are considered for the baseline characteristic.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
Total
n=1150 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=576 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
476 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
946 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
470 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
98 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
204 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=574 Participants
|
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=1150 Participants
|
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
353 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
708 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
355 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
221 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
442 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
221 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
574 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
1149 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
575 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
|
27.92 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.07 • n=574 Participants
|
27.94 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.94 • n=1150 Participants
|
27.95 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.81 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Body mass index - subgroups
< 25 kg/m^2
|
173 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
345 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
172 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Body mass index - subgroups
≥ 25 to < 30 kg/m^2
|
231 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
462 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
231 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Body mass index - subgroups
≥ 30 kg/m^2
|
170 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
343 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Number of pack-years
|
4.8 pack-years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=574 Participants
|
4.4 pack-years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=1150 Participants
|
4.1 pack-years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Duration of asthma disease
|
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=574 Participants
|
25.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=1150 Participants
|
24.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Duration of asthma disease by group
< 5 years
|
29 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Duration of asthma disease by group
5-20 years
|
182 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
358 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Duration of asthma disease by group
≥ 20 years
|
363 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
731 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
368 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Number of asthma exacerbations in the previous year
|
1.2 asthma exacerbations
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=574 Participants
|
1.2 asthma exacerbations
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=1150 Participants
|
1.2 asthma exacerbations
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Time since last documented asthma exacerbation
|
5.83 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.54 • n=574 Participants
|
5.81 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.57 • n=1150 Participants
|
5.78 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.60 • n=576 Participants
|
|
Asthma medication at study entry
Inhaled Corticosteroid(s) (ICS) / Long-Acting β2-Agonist (LABA); fixed combination
|
511 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
1033 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
522 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Asthma medication at study entry
Inhaled Corticosteroid(s) (ICS) + Long-Acting β2-Agonist (LABA); free combination
|
63 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Use of spacer device before study entry
YES
|
75 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Use of spacer device before study entry
NO
|
499 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
999 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
500 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Smoking status at screening
Ex-smoker
|
76 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Smoking status at screening
Non-smoker
|
498 Participants
n=574 Participants
|
982 Participants
n=1150 Participants
|
484 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Smoking duration
|
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=76 Participants • Row population differs from the 'Overall' number of subjects because only ex-smokers are considered for the baseline characteristic.
|
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=168 Participants • Row population differs from the 'Overall' number of subjects because only ex-smokers are considered for the baseline characteristic.
|
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=92 Participants • Row population differs from the 'Overall' number of subjects because only ex-smokers are considered for the baseline characteristic.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26.Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 was analysed at Week 26 of treatment. FEV1=Forced expiratory volume in the first second
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=553 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=557 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
1_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 26
|
0.127 Liter
Interval 0.098 to 0.157
|
0.185 Liter
Interval 0.155 to 0.214
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Asthma exacerbation (events): Moderate AND Severe. Severe: asthma worsening requiring initiation of treatment with systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days (courses of corticosteroids separated by ≥1 week treated as separate severe exacerbations). Moderate: ≥1 of the following criteria fulfilled and leading to a change in treatment (sustained increase of ≥1 puff of short acting beta 2-agonist \[SABA\] for 2 consecutive days) as shown below: * Nocturnal awakening(s) due to asthma requiring SABA for 2 consecutive nights/increase of ≥0.75 from baseline in daily symptom score on 2 consecutive days; increase from baseline in occasions of SABA use on 2 consecutive days (minimum increase 4 puffs/day); * ≥20% decrease in peak expiratory flow from baseline on at least 2 consecutive mornings/evenings or ≥20% decrease in FEV1 from baseline; * Visit to the ER/trial site for asthma treatment not requiring systemic corticosteroid.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
2_Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbation Rate Over the 52-Week Treatment Period
|
2.157 events/year
Interval 1.937 to 2.402
|
1.825 events/year
Interval 1.634 to 2.037
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) and Week 26.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Peak FEV1 was analysed within 3 hours post-dose. FEV1=Peak of forced expiratory volume in the first second
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=553 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=553 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
3_Change From Baseline in Peak(0-3h) FEV1 at Week 26
|
0.401 Liter
Interval 0.369 to 0.432
|
0.485 Liter
Interval 0.453 to 0.516
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in the average morning PEF over the 26-Week treatment. PEF=Peak expiratory flow; is the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one quick exhalation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=569 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=566 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
4_Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 26-Week Treatment
|
-3.131 Liter/min
Interval -6.533 to 0.271
|
5.325 Liter/min
Interval 1.921 to 8.729
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: The entire treatment period; up to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Severe Asthma Exacerbation Rate over the 52-Week Treatment Period in a pre-specified pooled analysis of 2 pivotal studies CCD-05993AB1-03 (TRIMARAN) and CCD-05993AB2-02 (TRIGGER). The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
5_Severe Asthma Exacerbation Rate Over the 52-Week Treatment Period - Pooled Analysis
|
0.310 events/year
Interval 0.271 to 0.354
|
0.239 events/year
Interval 0.206 to 0.276
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in peak FEV1 (within 3 h post-dosing) at all clinical visits. Baseline for pre-dose FEV1 was calculated as average of the FEV1 measurements (L) from the visit 2 (V2) Pre45min \& V2 Pre15min. If one of the two pre-dose values was missing, the baseline was equal to the available pre-dose value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 12
|
0.437 Liter
Interval 0.406 to 0.467
|
0.499 Liter
Interval 0.468 to 0.529
|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 26
|
0.401 Liter
Interval 0.369 to 0.432
|
0.485 Liter
Interval 0.453 to 0.516
|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 0
|
0.422 Liter
Interval 0.397 to 0.448
|
0.475 Liter
Interval 0.45 to 0.5
|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 4
|
0.445 Liter
Interval 0.415 to 0.474
|
0.520 Liter
Interval 0.49 to 0.549
|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 40
|
0.385 Liter
Interval 0.353 to 0.417
|
0.477 Liter
Interval 0.445 to 0.509
|
|
6_Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1 (0-3h) at All Clinical Visits
Week 52
|
0.406 Liter
Interval 0.373 to 0.439
|
0.472 Liter
Interval 0.439 to 0.505
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 at all clinical visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
7_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose FEV1 at All Clinical Visits
Week 40
|
0.130 Liter
Interval 0.099 to 0.161
|
0.188 Liter
Interval 0.157 to 0.219
|
|
7_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose FEV1 at All Clinical Visits
Week 52
|
0.158 Liter
Interval 0.127 to 0.189
|
0.196 Liter
Interval 0.165 to 0.227
|
|
7_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose FEV1 at All Clinical Visits
Week 26
|
0.127 Liter
Interval 0.098 to 0.157
|
0.185 Liter
Interval 0.155 to 0.214
|
|
7_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose FEV1 at All Clinical Visits
Week 4
|
0.147 Liter
Interval 0.12 to 0.173
|
0.194 Liter
Interval 0.168 to 0.221
|
|
7_Change From Baseline in Pre-Dose FEV1 at All Clinical Visits
Week 12
|
0.166 Liter
Interval 0.138 to 0.195
|
0.195 Liter
Interval 0.167 to 0.224
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26 and Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the percentage of patients classified as FEV1 responders at both Week 26 and Week 52. FEV1 response: Change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 ≥ 100 mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
8_FEV1 Response (FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) at Week 26 and Week 52
Week 26
|
258 Participants
|
309 Participants
|
|
8_FEV1 Response (FEV1 ≥ 100 mL) at Week 26 and Week 52
Week 52
|
278 Participants
|
306 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Baseline definition: mean of two pre-dose FEV1 measurements at visit 2 (V2). Results show the change from baseline in FEV1 area under the curve \[AUC\] (0-3h) at all subsequent visits (i.e. change from baseline of the AUC of the serial post-dose spirometry assessments till 3h post-dose).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 4
|
0.351 Liter
Interval 0.323 to 0.379
|
0.427 Liter
Interval 0.399 to 0.455
|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 12
|
0.354 Liter
Interval 0.324 to 0.383
|
0.411 Liter
Interval 0.381 to 0.44
|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 0
|
0.316 Liter
Interval 0.295 to 0.338
|
0.362 Liter
Interval 0.341 to 0.384
|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 26
|
0.314 Liter
Interval 0.283 to 0.345
|
0.399 Liter
Interval 0.368 to 0.43
|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 40
|
0.301 Liter
Interval 0.271 to 0.332
|
0.387 Liter
Interval 0.356 to 0.418
|
|
9_Change From Baseline in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Normalised by Time at All Clinical Visits
Week 52
|
0.324 Liter
Interval 0.292 to 0.356
|
0.384 Liter
Interval 0.352 to 0.416
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
ACQ-7 Questionnaire. Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) allows assessment of asthma control in individual patients. The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on lung function (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control (no impairment) and 6 indicating poor control (maximum impairment). The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. Baseline for ACQ-7 was the total score recorded at Visit 2 (Week 0) of the study. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
10_Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Score at All Clinical Visits
Week 26
|
-0.584 score on a scale
Interval -0.638 to -0.529
|
-0.627 score on a scale
Interval -0.681 to -0.572
|
|
10_Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Score at All Clinical Visits
Week 52
|
-0.722 score on a scale
Interval -0.779 to -0.665
|
-0.745 score on a scale
Interval -0.801 to -0.688
|
|
10_Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Score at All Clinical Visits
Week 4
|
-0.453 score on a scale
Interval -0.502 to -0.403
|
-0.502 score on a scale
Interval -0.551 to -0.453
|
|
10_Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Score at All Clinical Visits
Week 12
|
-0.576 score on a scale
Interval -0.629 to -0.522
|
-0.592 score on a scale
Interval -0.646 to -0.539
|
|
10_Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Score at All Clinical Visits
Week 40
|
-0.627 score on a scale
Interval -0.684 to -0.571
|
-0.672 score on a scale
Interval -0.729 to -0.615
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26 and Week 52Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (QAC-7) are defined in the description of Outcome measure 10 above. An ACQ-7 response was defined as change from baseline (Week 0, pre-dose) in ACQ-7 score ≤ -0.5; non-response was defined as change from baseline in ACQ-7 score \>-0.5 or missing data. Results represent the responders (i.e. change from baseline in ACQ-7 Score ≤ -0.5) at Week 26 and Week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
11_Asthma Control Questionnaire©-7 Response at Week 26 and Week 52
Week 26
|
291 Participants
|
317 Participants
|
|
11_Asthma Control Questionnaire©-7 Response at Week 26 and Week 52
Week 52
|
340 Participants
|
350 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in average MORNING PEF (L/min) over 52 weeks of treatment. PEF=Peak expiratory flow; is the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one quick exhalation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=569 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=566 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
12a_Change From Baseline in Average Morning PEF (L/Min) Over 52 Weeks of Treatment
|
-4.406 Liter/min
Interval -8.242 to -0.571
|
5.845 Liter/min
Interval 2.009 to 9.681
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26 and Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in average EVENING PEF (L/min) over 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. PEF=Peak expiratory flow; is the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one quick exhalation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
12b_Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF (L/Min) Over 26 and 52 Weeks of Treatment
Weeks 1-26
|
-5.502 Liter/min
Interval -8.989 to -2.015
|
5.828 Liter/min
Interval 2.33 to 9.327
|
|
12b_Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF (L/Min) Over 26 and 52 Weeks of Treatment
Weeks 1-52
|
-7.240 Liter/min
Interval -11.048 to -3.433
|
5.440 Liter/min
Interval 1.622 to 9.259
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Data were analysed for the number of patients at risk of a moderate or severe asthma exacerbation. Results show the number of patients who had moderate or severe asthma exacerbation over the 52 weeks treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
13_Number of Patients at Risk of Moderate or Severe Asthma Exacerbation Over 52 Weeks
|
379 Participants
|
337 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (Baseline) to 52 weeks for both studies in the pooled analysis.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Data were analysed for the number of patients at risk of a severe asthma exacerbation in the pooled analysis of the two pivotal studies CCD-05993AB1-03 (TRIMARAN) and CCD-05993AB2-02 (TRIGGER). Results show the number of patients who had a severe asthma exacerbation over the 52 weeks treatment period. The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
14_Number of Patients at Risk of Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Pooled Analysis of the Two Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-05993AB2-02
|
257 Participants
|
209 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Moderate asthma exacerbation rate over the 52-Week treatment period in the pooled analysis of the 2 pivotal studies CCD-05993AB1-03 (TRIMARAN) and CCD-055993AB2-02 (TRIGGER). The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
15_Moderate Asthma Exacerbation Rate Over the 52-Week Treatment Period in the Pooled Analysis of the 2 Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-055993AB2-02.
|
1.717 events/year
Interval 1.577 to 1.869
|
1.515 events/year
Interval 1.39 to 1.651
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Number of Patients at Risk of MODERATE Asthma Exacerbation in the Pooled Analysis of the Two Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-05993AB2-02. The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
16_Number of Patients at Risk of MODERATE Asthma Exacerbation in the Pooled Analysis of the Two Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-05993AB2-02
|
663 Participants
|
588 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Moderate and severe asthma exacerbation rate over the 52-Week treatment period in the pooled analysis of the 2 pivotal studies CCD-05993AB1-03 (TRIMARAN) and CCD-05993AB2-02 (TRIGGER). Results show the number of participants with moderate and severe asthma exacerbation. The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
17_Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbation Rate Over the 52-Week Treatment Period in the Pooled Analysis of the 2 Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-055993AB2-02
|
2.074 events/year
Interval 1.92 to 2.241
|
1.788 events/year
Interval 1.653 to 1.935
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation in the Pooled Analysis of the 2 Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 (TRIMARAN) and CCD-05993AB2-02 (TRIGGER). Results show the number of participants with moderate or severe asthma exacerbation. The pooled analysis of pivotal studies TRIMARAN and TRIGGER was a pre-specified secondary outcome measure for this study. Both studies have identical design, duration, endpoints, data collection, and statistical methodology for analyses. TRIMARAN and TRIGGER enrolled patients under medium dose and high dose ICS/LABA, respectively. Both studies were designed to assess the effect of the LAMA on ICS/LABA and showed homogeneity in terms of baseline characteristics, thus confirming the appropriateness of the pooling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=1145 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=1146 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
18_Number of Patients at Risk of Moderate OR Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Pooled Analysis of the Two Pivotal Studies CCD-05993AB1-03 and CCD-05993AB2-02
|
743 Participants
|
660 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Moderate asthma exacerbation rate over the 52-Week treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
19_Moderate Asthma Exacerbation Rate Over the 52-Week Treatment Period
|
1.821 events/year
Interval 1.621 to 2.046
|
1.575 events/year
Interval 1.399 to 1.773
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Data were analysed for the number of patients at risk of a MODERATE asthma exacerbation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
20_Number of Patients at Risk of a MODERATE Asthma Exacerbation
|
343 Participants
|
305 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 26 and Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in the average use of rescue medication over the 26- and 52-Week treatment periods. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
21a_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-26
|
-0.467 puffs/day
Interval -0.532 to -0.402
|
-0.475 puffs/day
Interval -0.54 to -0.41
|
|
21a_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-52
|
-0.537 puffs/day
Interval -0.603 to -0.471
|
-0.533 puffs/day
Interval -0.599 to -0.467
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the average use (puffs/day) of rescue medication in each inter-visit period. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
21b_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 2 - Visit 3 Weeks 1-4
|
-0.372 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 0.883
|
-0.340 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 0.825
|
|
21b_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 3 - Visit 4 Weeks 5-12
|
-0.468 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.079
|
-0.460 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 0.998
|
|
21b_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 4 - Visit 5 Weeks 13-26
|
-0.527 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.141
|
-0.494 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.103
|
|
21b_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 5 - Visit 6 Weeks 27-40
|
-0.616 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.230
|
-0.555 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.132
|
|
21b_Change From Baseline in the Average Use of Rescue Medication in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 6 - Visit 7 Weeks 41-52
|
-0.625 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.290
|
-0.617 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.217
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in the percentage of rescue medication-free days in each inter-visit period over the 26- and 52-Week treatment periods. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
22a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-26
|
14.723 percentage of days
Interval 12.674 to 16.772
|
14.702 percentage of days
Interval 12.656 to 16.747
|
|
22a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-52
|
16.606 percentage of days
Interval 14.519 to 18.693
|
16.377 percentage of days
Interval 14.295 to 18.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the percentage of rescue medication-free days in each inter-visit period over the entire treatment. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
22b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Period Over the Treatment
Visit 4 - Visit 5 Weeks 13-26
|
16.664 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 33.840
|
15.620 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 31.061
|
|
22b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Period Over the Treatment
Visit 5 - Visit 6 Weeks 27-40
|
18.948 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 35.215
|
16.908 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 31.486
|
|
22b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Period Over the Treatment
Visit 2 - Visit 3 Weeks 1-4
|
10.986 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 25.864
|
9.436 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 23.342
|
|
22b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Period Over the Treatment
Visit 3 - Visit 4 Weeks 5-12
|
15.334 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 30.671
|
14.146 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 29.065
|
|
22b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue Medication-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Period Over the Treatment
Visit 6 - Visit 7 Weeks 41-52
|
19.408 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 36.606
|
18.543 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 32.486
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study. Results show the change from baseline in the average daily asthma symptom scores over the 26- and 52-Weeks of treatment. A day represents data recorded in the evening session of that day plus the data recorded in the morning session of the next day. Symptoms considered: cough, wheeze, chest tightness, breathlessness. * Morning (night-time asthma symptom score): * 0 No symptoms; * 1 Mild = Symptoms not causing awakening; * 2 Moderate = Discomfort enough to cause awakenings; * 3 Severe = Causing awakenings for most of the night/did not sleep at all. * Evening (daytime asthma symptom score): * 0 No symptoms; * 1 Mild = Aware of symptoms, which could be easily tolerated; * 2 Moderate = Discomfort enough to cause interference with daily activity; * 3 Severe = Incapacitating
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
23a_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-26
|
-0.166 score on a scale
Interval -0.191 to -0.141
|
-0.161 score on a scale
Interval -0.186 to -0.136
|
|
23a_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-52
|
-0.194 score on a scale
Interval -0.221 to -0.167
|
-0.180 score on a scale
Interval -0.207 to -0.153
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the average daily asthma symptom scores in each inter-visit period over the entire treatment. Data was collected daily through an electronic diary from screening to the end of the study. A day represents data recorded in the evening session of that day plus the data recorded in the morning session of the next day. Symptoms considered: cough, wheeze, chest tightness, breathlessness. * Morning (night-time asthma symptom score): * 0 No symptoms; * 1 Mild = Symptoms not causing awakening; * 2 Moderate = Discomfort enough to cause awakenings; * 3 Severe = Causing awakenings for most of the night/did not sleep at all. * Evening (daytime asthma symptom score): * 0 No symptoms; * 1 Mild = Aware of symptoms, which could be easily tolerated; * 2 Moderate = Discomfort enough to cause interference with daily activity; * 3 Severe = Incapacitating
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
23b_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 3 - Visit 4 Weeks 5-12
|
-0.161 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.349
|
-0.155 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.317
|
|
23b_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 5 - Visit 6 Weeks 27-40
|
-0.222 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.416
|
-0.194 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.397
|
|
23b_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 2 - Visit 3 Weeks 1-4
|
-0.099 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.275
|
-0.102 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.252
|
|
23b_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 4 - Visit 5 Weeks 13-26
|
-0.195 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.379
|
-0.178 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.366
|
|
23b_Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Asthma Symptom Scores in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 6 - Visit 7 Weeks 41-52
|
-0.233 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.435
|
-0.210 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.419
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Change from baseline in the percentage of asthma symptom-free days over the 26- and 52-Week treatment periods. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study. Results show the change from baseline in the average daily asthma symptom scores over the 26- and 52-Week treatment periods. A day represents data recorded in the evening session of that day plus the data recorded in the morning session of the next day. Symptoms considered by the questionnaire: cough, wheeze, chest tightness, breathlessness. An asthma symptom-free day is a day with total daily asthma symptom score = 0. For a description of the score see outcome measure number 23.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
24a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-26
|
12.690 percentage of days
Interval 10.623 to 14.757
|
14.204 percentage of days
Interval 12.141 to 16.267
|
|
24a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-52
|
15.916 percentage of days
Interval 13.615 to 18.217
|
16.847 percentage of days
Interval 14.552 to 19.143
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the percentage of asthma symptom-free days in each inter-visit periods over the entire treatment. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to end of the study. A day represents data recorded in the evening session of that day plus the data recorded in the morning session of the next day. Symptoms considered by the questionnaire: cough, wheeze, chest tightness, breathlessness. An asthma symptom-free day is a day with total daily asthma symptom score = 0. For a description of the score see outcome measure number 23.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
24b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Periods
Visit 2 - Visit 3 Weeks 1-4
|
5.643 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 18.612
|
6.753 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 18.224
|
|
24b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Periods
Visit 3 - Visit 4 Weeks 5-12
|
11.378 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 25.671
|
13.511 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 26.291
|
|
24b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Periods
Visit 4 - Visit 5 Weeks 13-26
|
15.575 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 30.808
|
16.937 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 29.661
|
|
24b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Periods
Visit 5 - Visit 6 Weeks 27-40
|
17.918 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 33.121
|
18.976 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 33.106
|
|
24b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Symptom-Free Days in Each Inter-Visit Periods
Visit 6 - Visit 7 Weeks 41-52
|
19.823 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 35.464
|
20.512 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 34.124
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the percentage of asthma control days over the 26- and 52-Week treatment periods. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study. Scoring of asthma symptoms (overall symptoms, cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness): Morning (night-time asthma symptoms): 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild - symptoms not causing awakening), 2 (moderate - discomfort enough to cause awakenings) and 3 (severe - causing awakenings for most of the night/did not sleep at all). Evening (daytime asthma symptoms): 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild: aware of symptoms that could be easily tolerated), 2 (moderate: discomfort enough to cause interference with daily activity), 3 (severe: incapacitating with inability to work/take part in usual activity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
25a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-26
|
12.132 percentage of days
Interval 10.102 to 14.162
|
13.890 percentage of days
Interval 11.863 to 15.916
|
|
25a_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days Over the 26- and 52-Week Treatment Periods
Weeks 1-52
|
15.109 percentage of days
Interval 12.863 to 17.355
|
16.395 percentage of days
Interval 14.154 to 18.635
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 (pre-treatment, baseline) to Week 52.Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who receive at least one dose of the study treatment and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy (primary or secondary efficacy variables) after the baseline.
Results show the change from baseline in the percentage of asthma control days in each inter-visit period. A day represents data recorded in the evening session of that day plus the data recorded in the morning session of the next day. Data was collected through an electronic daily diary from screening to the end of the study Scoring of asthma symptoms (overall symptoms, cough, wheeze, chest tightness and breathlessness): Morning (night-time asthma symptoms): 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild - symptoms not causing awakening), 2 (moderate - discomfort enough to cause awakenings) and 3 (severe - causing awakenings for most of the night/did not sleep at all). Evening (daytime asthma symptoms): 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild: aware of symptoms that could be easily tolerated), 2 (moderate: discomfort enough to cause interference with daily activity), 3 (severe: incapacitating with inability to work/take part in usual activity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 Participants
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=575 Participants
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
|---|---|---|
|
25b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 2 - Visit 3 Weeks 1-4
|
5.754 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 18.190
|
6.869 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 18.066
|
|
25b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 3 - Visit 4 Weeks 5-12
|
10.908 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 25.058
|
13.212 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 26.096
|
|
25b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 4 - Visit 5 Weeks 13-26
|
14.794 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 30.096
|
16.495 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 29.096
|
|
25b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 5 - Visit 6 Weeks 27-40
|
16.919 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 32.002
|
18.522 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 32.337
|
|
25b_Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Asthma Control Days in Each Inter-Visit Period
Visit 6 - Visit 7 Weeks 41-52
|
18.823 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 34.264
|
19.802 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 33.330
|
Adverse Events
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=576 participants at risk
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 participants at risk
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Mantle cell lymphoma stage IV
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm rupture
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Subclavian artery stenosis
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis limb
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
1.2%
7/576 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.70%
4/574 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar inflammation
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb crushing injury
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.35%
2/576 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular failure
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Stress cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.35%
2/576 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Subcutaneous emphysema
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.35%
2/574 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bursitis infective
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media chronic
|
0.17%
1/576 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/574 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.52%
3/574 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/576 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.17%
1/574 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
n=576 participants at risk
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg
CHF 5993 100/6/12.5 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24/50 µg BDP/FF/GB
|
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
n=574 participants at risk
CHF 1535 100/6 µg
CHF 1535 100/6 µg: 2 inhalations bid Total daily dose: 400/24 µg BDP/FF
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
2.1%
12/576 • Number of events 20 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
1.2%
7/574 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.8%
16/576 • Number of events 22 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
1.6%
9/574 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.6%
38/576 • Number of events 49 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
8.0%
46/574 • Number of events 52 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
58.0%
334/576 • Number of events 1179 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
65.7%
377/574 • Number of events 1348 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.6%
9/576 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.1%
12/574 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.4%
8/576 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.4%
14/574 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.3%
71/576 • Number of events 85 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
13.6%
78/574 • Number of events 98 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
2.6%
15/576 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
4.5%
26/574 • Number of events 30 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
3.1%
18/576 • Number of events 22 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
3.8%
22/574 • Number of events 26 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
2.1%
12/576 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
16/574 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.1%
12/576 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
16/574 • Number of events 20 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
1.4%
8/576 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.1%
12/574 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
1.0%
6/576 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
2.1%
12/574 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events (AE) were reported from the time of patient informed consent signature until study completion at week 52 or at study discontinuation.
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with date of first randomised study treatment intake as AE onset date and date of completion/discontinuation. The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Trial Transparency
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Results of this study may be published or presented at scientific meetings. If a publication is presented by the Investigator, the Investigator agrees to submit all manuscripts or abstracts to the Sponsor to Chiesi before submission.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER