MedTrace Logo

Relationship Between Aerobic Prescription Methods

NCT02660450 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2016-01-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Current literature report 3 ways to prescribe and control aerobic training. Such models require comparison to determine if they really provide the same impact training in a prescription. The aim of this study is to compare the results of different methods of prescription of aerobic training, ie VO2 workload, heart rate (HR), and load self adjusted by perceived effort (PSE) as well as psychological responses activation, and feel depending on the stimuli offered.

Conditions

  • Healthy

Interventions

OTHER

Prescription for Workload

Prescription from 65% VO2max for 5 min of exercise

OTHER

Prescription for Heart Rate

Prescription from 60 - 65% Maximum Heart Rate for 5 min of exercise

OTHER

Prescription Self Selected

Prescription Self Selected from Perceived exertion at 3 - 4 (moderate) for 5 min of exercise

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-02-29
Primary Completion
2016-04-30
Completion
2016-07-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02660450 on ClinicalTrials.gov