MedTrace Logo

Comparative Evaluation of Herbal and Allopathic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Diarrhea

NCT02642250 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2016-01-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Revival of significance and the emergent market of herbal medicinal products necessitate strong commitment by the stakeholders to safeguard the end users. The variability in the concentrations of constituents of plant material, coupled with the variety of extraction techniques and processing steps used by different manufacturers, results in distinct inconsistency in the quality of herbal products. The present study will be directed to a polyherbal formulation Entoban which integrates an outstanding blend of herbs that have been used for decades to eradicate microorganisms and worms from gastrointestinal tract. It is the combination of Holarrhena antidysenterica, Berberis aristata, Symplocos racemosa, Querecus infectoria and Helicteres isora. The current study would target the chemical assessment, pharmacological and comparative clinical evaluation of Entoban to assure its safety and efficacy.

Conditions

  • Chronic Diarrhea

Interventions

DRUG

Metronidazole

The data will be recorded for physical examination including gender , age, height, weight, temperature, heart rate ,respiratory rate and blood pressure of the subject, number of stool per day, stool with or without mucus or mixed with blood along with abdominal cramps, dehydration, nausea, vomiting and related clinical information will be carefully recorded. Statistical tools and tabulated results will be used to identify the similarities and differences in safety, efficacy and tolerability of treatment.

DRUG

Entoban

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of coded herbal formulation (Entoban) through randomized clinical study and compared with Metronidazole DS for treatment of gastrointestinal infections for improving the health of the community with due regard to the prevalence of disease and the feasibility of using alternative treatments.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shifa Ul Mulk Memorial Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Khan Usman Ghani, Ph. D · Hamdard University Karachi

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-12-31
Completion
2015-12-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02642250 on ClinicalTrials.gov