Shock Wave Therapy: Do the External Appearance of the Device Influence Clinical Outcomes?

NCT02608723 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 135

Last updated 2015-11-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To check in patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis treated with shock wave therapy, if the outward appearance of the device affects clinical outcomes.

Conditions

  • Plantar Fasciitis
  • Pain

Interventions

DEVICE

Standard shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

DEVICE

Austere shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

DEVICE

Sophisticated shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Antoni Morral, PhDc · Rehabilitation Center "Salut i Esport"

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-06-30
Primary Completion
2015-06-30
Completion
2015-06-30

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02608723 on ClinicalTrials.gov