REal World Advanced Experience of BioResorbable ScaffolD by SMart Angioplasty Research Team (SMART REWARD)
NCT02601404 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1000
Last updated 2017-03-03
Summary
Current drug-eluting stents (DES) has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. However, a continued risk of clinical events even several years after the procedure is reported. Stent platform or polymer-associated inflammation may play a role.
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is known to disappear 2 to 3 years after the implantation, which may result in the more favorable very long-term clinical outcomes compared with metallic stents. The initial clinical experiences of BRS in relatively simple lesion subsets were comparable to DESs.
BRS, however, is limited by the disadvantageous mechanical characteristics such as thick strut and the risk of fracture by overdilation. There is concern that BRS is less optimal for complex lesion subsets such as bifurcation lesions, calcified tortuous lesions, or diffuse long lesions. Real world registry is needed to test the feasibility and safety of BRS in these complex lesion subsets.
Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS)
The implantation procedure of an Absorb™ is similar to a metallic stent.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Samsung Medical Center
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-31
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
BES, EES, and ZES-R in Real World Practice
NCT01397175 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT
NCT02607241 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bioabsorbable Scaffold vs Drug-coated Balloon for Coronary de Novo Lesions in STEMI: Prospective Observational Trial
NCT04565561 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-eluting Metallic Stent in Long Coronary Lesions
NCT02796157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stents
NCT01711931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Biodegradable Stents: Orsiro and BioMatrix
NCT02084901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De-Novo Coronary Lesions in Patients With High Bleeding Risk-2
NCT06742931 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesiveness of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents to the Delivery Balloon-Catheter: A Randomized Comparison
NCT00279006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
OPtimal stEnt Deployment stRategy oF Contemporary sTents - Registry to Evaluate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Bioresorbable Scaffolds With Thinner-strut Construction and Guidance by intracOronary Imaging to REduce Scaffold Failure
NCT06919562 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent Versus Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Diabetic Patients
NCT01710748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prospective Study to Assess DES Re-endothelization in BMS Restenosis and De-novo Lesions
NCT01243099 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sirolimus-eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Everolimus-eluting Stents
NCT01443104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Coronary Microcirculatory and Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds
NCT03076476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases Trial - Comparison of REDUCTION of PrasugrEl Dose & POLYmer TECHnology in ACS Patients (HOST REDUCE POLYTECH RCT Trial)
NCT02193971 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bioabsorbable Versus Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent (DES): a Meta-analysis
NCT01466634 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effects of Bindarit in Preventing Stent Restenosis
NCT01269242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Drug Eluting Balloon and Drug Eluting Stent
NCT01539603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Neointimal Coverage After Implantation of Biolimus Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer: Optical Coherence Tomographic Assessment According to the Treatment of Dyslipidemia and Hypertension and the Types of Implanted Drug-eluting Stents
NCT01502904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Absorb BVS vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of ISR
NCT02474485 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
ISAR-DAPT (A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in the 3-Months DAPT Group vs. the 6-Months DAPT Group of Patients Treated With the Coroflex ISAR Stent; A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial)
NCT02609698 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer vs Durable-polymer in Diabetic Patients
NCT02854423 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Leave Nothing Behind Study Which Compares DCB With Bail Out BRS Versus BRS Strategy Alone
NCT07038408 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A New Strategy Regarding Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet
NCT01145079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Everolimus- Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comers
NCT01472705 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Investigation for Everolimus Drug Eluting Stent
NCT06769217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4