Grinding Versus Standard Methods for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis

NCT02598141 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 122

Last updated 2026-02-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability (sensitivity and specificity) of standard bacteriological analysis made from one or other of the two sampling processing techniques and perioperative management of samples : the Ultra Turrax method that uses grinding versus the standard method.

Conditions

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

Biological sampling grinding

One half of the biological material collected during the intervetion (according to standard procedures) will be ground using the Ultra Turrax technique before proceeding with culturing.

BIOLOGICAL

Biological sampling with standard procedures

One half of the biological material collected during the intervetion (according to standard procedures) will be treated according to standard techniques before proceeding with culturing.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Nicolas Cellier, MD · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-05-18
Primary Completion
2018-11-21
Completion
2018-11-21

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02598141 on ClinicalTrials.gov