Closed Window vs. Open Window Technique in Management of Palatally Impacted Canines

NCT02582645 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2015-10-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this investigation the investigators would like to find out which of two commonly used techniques of management of palatally impacted canines: closed-window (CWT) or open-window (OWT), produces more favorable outcome.

Conditions

  • Impacted Canine

Interventions

PROCEDURE

open window technique

palatally impacted canine will be exposed and left without traction for a maximum of 9 months

PROCEDURE

closed window technique

palatally impacted canine will be exposed, an attachment will be bonded, and then the canine will be covered with palatal tissue; traction of the canine will be initiated within 2 weeks following surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Jagiellonian University

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Ghent

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital Olomouc

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
11 Years
Max Age
17 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-10-31
Primary Completion
2019-09-30
Completion
2020-09-30

Countries

  • Belgium
  • Czechia
  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02582645 on ClinicalTrials.gov