Correction of Angular Deformities in Knee Arthrosis
NCT02581605 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 84
Last updated 2019-03-13
Summary
For participants whose leg bones don't line up properly, extra stress is placed on either the inner or outer side of the knee joint due to uneven transfer of body-weight. Gradually, this extra pressure wears away the smooth cartilage, resulting in osteoarthritis on that side of the knee joint. This problem is particularly common in young athletes and places them at risk of early osteoarthritis.
An operation exists whereby one of the bones either side of the knee is cut ( an osteotomy) and hinged open to straighten the leg. This alteration redistributes body-weight more equally across the knee joint and is known to be effective in delaying and possibly preventing, the progression of knee osteoarthritis- especially in younger and physically more active patients in whom a knee replacement is undesirable.
Currently it is possible to ( accurately) calculate the precise position of the bone cut and number of degrees correction required to straighten a leg using digital x-rays and three-dimensional CT scans. However there is no method of implementing this pre-operative plan during surgery so that the majority of surgeons rely on relatively crude and ipso facto unreliable intra-operative measurements as a guide.
To improve the accuracy of this operation, the investigator propose the use of a custom-made 'cutting block', tailored for each individual patient and its shape will match the contour of the patient's bone to ensure it can only be placed in one position. Pre-cut slots and holes will then guide the saw cut and the number of degrees the bone in hinged open, as per the pre-operative plan; it functions as an intra-operative template for the surgeon.
This study will primarily examine whether there is a close match between the planned and actual correction of leg deformities when using a patient-matched cutting-block.
Conditions
- Arthritis of Knee
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Custom-made 'cutting block'
To improve the accuracy of this operation we propose the use of a custom-made 'cutting block' tailored for each individual patient.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Imperial College London
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Professor Justin Cobb · Imperial College London
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2028-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-12-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques Using the Unity Knee™ Total Knee System
NCT03511144 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cemented Versus Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05935878 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bespoke vs Standard Instrumentation in TKR
NCT02845206 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Native Alignment in the Setting of an Arthritic Knee in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06617338 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of MOTO Medial® Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03211663 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Different Insoles as Conservative Treatment for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04967339 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Can Proprioceptive Knee Brace Improve Functional Outcome Following TKA?
NCT05693493 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does Addition of a Functional Knee Brace Improve Rehabilitation Outcome in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee?
NCT02712710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a Distraction-rotation Knee Unloader Brace in Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.
NCT01884883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validating the Clinical Effect of a Knee Orthosis
NCT06655558 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs. High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis (UNIKORN): a Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05442242 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Unicompartmental Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
NCT04992078 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reverse Drilling Technique in Improving Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT05994872 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05461638 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Navigational Unit
NCT00862316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Conventional and Patient-specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02230215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Assessment of Patient Specific Instrumentation for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT02748096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Frequency Intensive Autologous PRP Injection and Genicular Nerve Blocks in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04088045 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT: Mako Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Oxford Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04095637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Axial Alignment in Patients Operated Using the Visionaire Patient Matched Cutting Blocks
NCT01224522 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effects of Unloader Bracing in Clinical Outcome and Cartilage Physiology Following Microfracture of Chondral Defects
NCT02016300 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Levitation Knee Brace
NCT05543486 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Balanced Buttress Absorbable Spacer
NCT03060382 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Trial of Mechanical Axis vs Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02527148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Unicompartment Arthroplasty Retrospective and Clinical Outcome Study
NCT02583113 ·Status: WITHDRAWN