Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mesalamine 4 g Sachet for the Induction of Remission in Active, Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC) (NCT NCT02522767)
NCT ID: NCT02522767
Last Updated: 2021-03-15
Results Overview
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 with at least 1 point decrease from baseline for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0-9, higher scores indicating greater disease severity. This score had two components: Clinical Response which assessed subject's symptoms and ranged between 0-6, and Endoscopic Response which assessed objective evidence of inflammation and ranged between 0-3. Further, the Clinical Response component included two subscales: stool frequency and rectal bleeding (each ranged between 0-3 each) obtained from subjects' daily records. The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (ranging between 0-3).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
228 participants
At Week 8
2021-03-15
Participant Flow
A total of 71 sites in 10 countries (Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Ukraine, and United States) recruited subjects to this trial between October 2015 to November 2017, the last subject completed last visit in April 2018.
A total of 411 subjects were screened, of which 228 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either mesalamine or placebo group (114 subjects each), for 8 weeks double-blind treatment. Subjects who completed 8 weeks but failed to meet the defined criteria for remission received open-label treatment with mesalamine for additional 8 weeks.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 4 gram (g) extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD)
|
Placebo
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind
STARTED
|
114
|
114
|
|
Double-blind
COMPLETED
|
103
|
90
|
|
Double-blind
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
24
|
|
Open-label
STARTED
|
88
|
82
|
|
Open-label
COMPLETED
|
83
|
75
|
|
Open-label
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 4 gram (g) extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD)
|
Placebo
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind
Withdrawal by Subject
|
8
|
11
|
|
Double-blind
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Double-blind
Adverse Event
|
1
|
10
|
|
Double-blind
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
|
Double-blind
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
2
|
|
Double-blind
Protocol Deviation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open-label
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
3
|
|
Open-label
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Open-label
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
|
Open-label
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
|
Open-label
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Mesalamine 4 g Sachet for the Induction of Remission in Active, Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Total
n=228 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
107 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
212 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09 • n=99 Participants
|
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68 • n=107 Participants
|
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.42 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
105 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
210 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
105 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
208 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
24.68 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.546 • n=99 Participants
|
24.63 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.578 • n=107 Participants
|
24.66 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.552 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Stool Frequency Score
|
1.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81 • n=99 Participants
|
1.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=107 Participants
|
1.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.80 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Rectal Bleeding Score
|
1.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54 • n=99 Participants
|
1.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58 • n=107 Participants
|
1.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Endoscopic Response Score
|
2.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47 • n=99 Participants
|
2.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 • n=107 Participants
|
2.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47 • n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized subjects.
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 with at least 1 point decrease from baseline for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0-9, higher scores indicating greater disease severity. This score had two components: Clinical Response which assessed subject's symptoms and ranged between 0-6, and Endoscopic Response which assessed objective evidence of inflammation and ranged between 0-3. Further, the Clinical Response component included two subscales: stool frequency and rectal bleeding (each ranged between 0-3 each) obtained from subjects' daily records. The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (ranging between 0-3).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Remission
|
19 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized subjects.
The Modified Mayo score was calculated as the sum of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score (Range: 0-9, and the standard PGA score (range: 0-3; normal \[score=0\], mild disease \[score=1\], moderate disease \[score=2\], severe disease \[score=3\]). The statistical test was to be conducted only if the primary analysis was significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Remission in the Primary Endpoint and the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score of ≤1 (Modified Mayo Score)
|
19 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized subjects.
Defined as time in days from randomization to the first day of 3 consecutive days with a rectal bleeding score of 0, based on subject's daily diary. The statistical test was to be conducted only if the primary analysis was significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Cessation of Rectal Bleeding
|
18.0 days
Interval 13.0 to 30.0
|
43.0 days
Interval 23.0 to
Not estimable: Not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with cessation.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised randomized subjects.
Defined as an Endoscopic Response Score of 0 or 1, with at least a 1 point reduction from baseline in the endoscopic score at Week 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Proportion of Subjects With Endoscopic Improvement
|
34 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 2, 4, and 8Population: The ITT analysis comprised all randomized subjects.
Defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 with at least 1 point decrease from baseline for stool frequency in the Clinical Response Score subset.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
|
19 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
|
The Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
|
29 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
The Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
|
40 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised randomized subjects.
Defined as time in days from randomization to the first day of 3 consecutive days with a stool frequency score of 0, based on subject daily diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Normal Stool Pattern
|
55.0 days
Interval 35.0 to
Not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
NA days
Not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 2, 4, and 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised randomized subjects.
Defined as change from baseline in rectal bleeding score at Week 2, 4, and 8 based on subject daily diary. Rectal Bleeding Score is graded 0-3, where 0 is best.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
|
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
|
-0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
-0.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
|
-0.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 2, 4, and 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprise all randomized subjects.
The adjusted mean changes in serum CRP levels from baseline and their difference between treatment groups are presented for each time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 4
|
-0.86 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.52
|
-1.05 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.27
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 2
|
0.60 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.52
|
0.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.67
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Week 8
|
-2.01 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.09
|
-0.73 mg/L
Standard Deviation 22.51
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized subjects.
The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Week 8 are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Week 8
|
-144.93 ug/g
Standard Deviation 854.41
|
-119.56 ug/g
Standard Deviation 1083.69
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 2, 4, and 8Population: The ITT analysis set comprised randomized subjects.
The change from baseline to Week 2, 4, and 8 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores. The adjusted changes from baseline and their differences between treatment groups are presented. The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult patients with UC. Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and QoL from last two weeks and to rate each item on a 7- point Likert score (higher scores equate to higher QoL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
Week 2
|
24.79 points on a score
Standard Deviation 25.92
|
18.75 points on a score
Standard Deviation 33.87
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
Week 4
|
33.58 points on a score
Standard Deviation 29.69
|
28.13 points on a score
Standard Deviation 33.08
|
—
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
Week 8
|
34.41 points on a score
Standard Deviation 37.23
|
24.73 points on a score
Standard Deviation 36.42
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 16Population: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to actual treatment received.
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject taking part in a clinical trial. A 'treatment-emergent AE (TEAE)' is defined as an AE which occurs in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit. Proportion of subjects with any TEAE (serious or non-serious) are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
Any TEAE
|
28 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
Serious AE
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 16Population: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to actual treatment received.
The proportion of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Mild
|
23 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Moderate
|
6 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Severity of Adverse Events
Severe
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 16Population: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to actual treatment received.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. \>= greater than equal to; \<= less than equal to.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%), Normal>=10 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Hematocrit (%), Low<=0.32 to Abnormal
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Leukocytes (10^3/uL), Normal >=16.0 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%), Low<=10 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%), Normal<=10 to Abnormal
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%), High>=80 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Erythrocytes (10^6/uL), Low<=3.5 to Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Erythrocytes (10^6/uL), Normal<=3.5 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Hematocrit (%), Normal<=0.32 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Hematocrit (%), Normal>=0.56 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Hemoglobin (g/dL), Low<=115 to Abnormal
|
21 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Hemoglobin (g/dL), Normal<=115 to Abnormal
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Leukocytes (10^3/uL), Normal <=2.8 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Leukocytes (10^3/uL), High >=16.0 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Neutrophils/Leukocyte (%), Normal<=15 to Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Neutrophils/Leukocyte (%), Normal>=90 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Neutrophils/Leukocyte (%), High >=90 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subject With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Hematology)
Platelets (10^3/uL), High>=700 to Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 16Population: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to actual treatment received.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline values in coagulation laboratory values are presented. INR= International normalized ratio.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Coagulation)
Prothrombin INR, Normal <0.8 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Coagulation)
Prothrombin INR, Normal >1.1 to Abnormal
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Coagulation)
Prothrombin INR, High >1.1 to Abnormal
|
4 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 16Population: The safety analysis set comprised all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP, and was analyzed according to actual treatment received.
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes in serum chemistry laboratory values are presented. ALT= Alanine aminotransferase; AST= Aspartate aminotransferase; BUN= Blood urea nitrogen; GGT= Gamma glutamyl transferase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 Participants
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 Participants
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
ALT (U/L), Normal >3xULN to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
AST (U/L), Normal >3xULN to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
AST (U/L), High >3xULN to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Bilirubin (mg/dL), Normal >=1.5xULN to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Bilirubin (mg/dL), High >=1.5xULN to Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
BUN (mg/dL), Normal >=10.7 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Calcium (mg/dL), Normal <=1.8 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Chloride (mmol/L), Normal >=115 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Chloride (mmol/L), High >=115 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
GGT (U/L), High >3xULN to Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Glucose (mg/dL), Normal >=10 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Glucose (mg/dL), High >=10 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Potassium (mmol/L), Normal <=3.0 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Potassium (mmol/L), Normal >=5.8 to Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Potassium (mmol/L), High >=5.8 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry)
Sodium (mmol/L), Low<=130 to Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Mesalamine
Placebo
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 participants at risk
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 participants at risk
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 participants at risk
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Tracheitis
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/114 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/170 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/114 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/114 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.59%
1/170 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylitis
|
0.00%
0/114 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/114 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.59%
1/170 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Mesalamine
n=114 participants at risk
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
Placebo
n=114 participants at risk
Placebo 4 g to match mesalamine extended release granules, administered orally QD
|
Mesalamine (Open-Label)
n=170 participants at risk
Mesalamine 4 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 3 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 3 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/170 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 3 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/170 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 3 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
8.8%
10/114 • Number of events 10 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
2.4%
4/170 • Number of events 4 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
5.3%
6/114 • Number of events 6 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/170 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Investigations
Faecal calprotectin increased
|
4.4%
5/114 • Number of events 5 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
1.8%
2/114 • Number of events 2 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
2.4%
4/170 • Number of events 4 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.88%
1/114 • Number of events 1 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
2.6%
3/114 • Number of events 3 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
0.00%
0/170 • TEAE occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of trial visit, up to 8 weeks for the Mesalamine and Placebo Arms and an additional 8 weeks for the Open-Label extension period.
TEAEs were defined as AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (IMP intake) to the end of treatment visit.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER