Short Terms Effects of Medial Branch Block vs Para-spinal Muscle Injection in Patients With Non-specific CLBP

NCT02521519 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2018-10-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares the efficacy of medial branch block (MBB) vs. paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection for pain relief in chronic low back pain. Based on randomization in first intervention session, one side receives MBB and the other side takes PDI and in second session the pattern reverses.

Conditions

  • Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Interventions

OTHER

Medial branch block in one side

MBB: Using sterile conditions, 25G needles will be placed in the desired position. In its final position for the L3 and L4 vertebrae the needle tip should reside at the junction of the superior articular process and the transverse process. At the L5-S1 level the needle tip should reach the junction between the sacral ala and the superior articular process of S1. Following a negative aspiration 0.5ml of injectate will be injected into each site.

OTHER

paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection

injections will target the deep para-spinal muscles between the spinous process and inter-pedicular line of the L3-5 vertebrae. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 25-gauge needle will be advanced, directed towards the lamina at the mid-distance between inter-pedicular line and the spinous process of the L3, L4 and L5 vertebrae, until touching the bone. A straight forceps will be attached to the junction of the skin and the needle; the needle will then be withdrawn by 1.4cm, to reside inside the muscle bulk. A five ml syringe diameter will be used to point 1.4 cm withdrawal. Following a negative blood aspiration, each level will be injected with 0.5 ml of the injectate.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-08-31
Primary Completion
2020-03-31
Completion
2020-06-30

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02521519 on ClinicalTrials.gov