Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dietary Treatment Study of Pediatric NAFLD (NCT NCT02513121)

NCT ID: NCT02513121

Last Updated: 2020-01-28

Results Overview

The principal objective of this randomized and controlled pilot study is to evaluate whether 8 weeks of a low added sugar diet (\<3%) in boys with NAFLD will change liver fat % measured by MRI.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

40 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Measurements done at baseline and week 8.

Results posted on

2020-01-28

Participant Flow

Children with NAFLD were recruited from two US academic clinical research centers (University of California, San Diego and Emory University)

Boys ages 11 - 16 with biopsy proven NAFLD were randomized

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Group
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
Habitual diet
Overall Study
STARTED
20
20
Overall Study
COMPLETED
20
20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Dietary Treatment Study of Pediatric NAFLD

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
12.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 • n=99 Participants
13.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=107 Participants
13.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
40 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
38 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
31 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
40 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8.

The principal objective of this randomized and controlled pilot study is to evaluate whether 8 weeks of a low added sugar diet (\<3%) in boys with NAFLD will change liver fat % measured by MRI.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Percentage of Liver Fat Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Intervention Group Compared to Change in the Control Group
Baseline
22.9 Percentage of liver fat
Interval 18.7 to 28.0
19.4 Percentage of liver fat
Interval 16.2 to 23.2
Change in Percentage of Liver Fat Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Intervention Group Compared to Change in the Control Group
Week 8
14.9 Percentage of liver fat
Interval 11.4 to 19.6
18.0 Percentage of liver fat
Interval 14.0 to 22.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
103.3 U/L
Interval 79.7 to 133.8
81.8 U/L
Interval 63.2 to 106.0
Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
61.3 U/L
Interval 46.1 to 81.3
75.2 U/L
Interval 56.7 to 99.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements doen at baseline and week 8

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
52.0 U/L
Interval 39.5 to 68.4
43.6 U/L
Interval 33.2 to 57.4
Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
34.5 U/L
Interval 27.3 to 43.6
39.1 U/L
Interval 31.0 to 49.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
44.3 U/L
Interval 33.5 to 58.6
44.1 U/L
Interval 33.4 to 58.4
Change in Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
33.0 U/L
Interval 26.1 to 41.6
42.8 U/L
Interval 33.9 to 54.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=19 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=19 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Insulin From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
38.4 mg/dL
Interval 28.6 to 51.6
41.8 mg/dL
Interval 31.2 to 56.0
Change in Insulin From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
37.7 mg/dL
Interval 29.5 to 48.2
43.8 mg/dL
Interval 34.5 to 55.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8

HOMA-IR was calculated as follows: fasting insulin (µU/mL) x fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=19 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=19 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
8.6 HOMA score
Interval 6.3 to 11.9
9.2 HOMA score
Interval 6.7 to 12.7
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
7.7 HOMA score
Interval 5.9 to 10.0
10.2 HOMA score
Interval 7.9 to 13.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measurements done at baseline and week 8

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Habitual diet
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 8
Baseline
121.7 mg/dL
Interval 96.7 to 153.2
138.9 mg/dL
Interval 110.3 to 174.8
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 8
Week 8
104.1 mg/dL
Interval 82.6 to 131.3
134.3 mg/dL
Interval 106.5 to 169.4

Adverse Events

Intervention Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Intervention Group
n=20 participants at risk
Low free sugar diet
Control Group
n=20 participants at risk
Habitual diet
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
5.0%
1/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Persistant Cough
5.0%
1/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sprained Ankle
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.
5.0%
1/20 • Adverse event details were collected throughout the duration of study participation, from the Baseline visit through the Week 8 follow up visit.
For this study, an adverse event is considered any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the dietary intervention.

Additional Information

Dr. Jeffrey Schwimmer

University of California, San Diego

Phone: 858-966-8907

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place