IVM for Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVFoutcomes and Does it Improve the Following IVF Cycle?
NCT02498210 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25
Last updated 2019-11-27
Summary
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. During IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place. , with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway. Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield
Conditions
- Infertility Female
Interventions
- OTHER
-
In Vitro Maturation Procedure
POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sheba Medical Center
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Ettie Maman, MD · Sheba Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2020-07-31
- Completion
- 2020-07-31
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Routine Hysteroscopy in IVF/ICSI Cycles in Patients With Primary Unexplained Infertility
NCT02416596 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrashort GnRH Agonist/Antagonist Versus GnRH Antagonist IVF
NCT02173977 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Dual Ovarian Stimulation Versus Two Antagonist Stimulations in Poor Ovarian Responders
NCT06093984 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transfer of Fresh Versus Frozen/Thawed Embryos in IVF Cycles Where GnRH Agonist is Utilized for Oocyte Maturation.
NCT00365027 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cumulative Live Birth After Double Stimulation Protocol Versus Antagonist Protocol for Poor Ovarian Responders
NCT05765968 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Levels of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) During Ovarian Stimulation With Gonadotropins
NCT02237781 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT02195947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
SMART Protocol vs Antagonist Protocol in IVF
NCT05677828 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Delayed Embryo Transfer in Poor Responders
NCT02431689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Versus Modified Natural Cycles in Poor Responders
NCT04487925 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopy in Failed IVF
NCT06165484 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
NCT03607409 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Role of Heparin in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation
NCT01315093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Retrospective Trial on Low Prognosis Infertile Patients
NCT03290911 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Efficacy & Safety of IVF-M HP Inj. vs. Menopur® Inj.
NCT02458768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation
NCT01319708 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between IVM and Minimal Stimulation IVF in Patients With PCOS
NCT03134482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of GnRH Antagonist vs Agonist Long on IVF Outcome, Peak Estradiol Level,and Duration of Stimulation
NCT01669291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Ovarian Stimulation Protocols on the Success Rate of ICSI in Female Infertility
NCT04071574 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Ovarian Response Prediction in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Patients
NCT01206803 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing IVF/ICSI Cycle Outcomes of Post Ovulation Ovarian Stimulation Protocol With Elonva Without GnRH Antagonist to Follicular Phase Day 2 Stimulation Fixed Day 5 Antagonist Protocol
NCT06879002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Correlation With IVF Treatments
NCT02442895 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
In-Vitro Maturation of Oocytes From Polycystic Ovarian Patients Undergoing IVF
NCT00561808 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone Analogues on Oocyte and Embryo Quality
NCT03139474 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Effect of Dual Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation on IVF/ICSI Outcomes in Patients With Suboptimal Ovarian Response
NCT04549649 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA