Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intuition vs. Deliberation in Medical Decision Making (NCT NCT02487810)

Intuition vs. Deliberation in Medical Decision Making

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a feeding tube for chronic aspiration. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a situation in which they are unable to eat or drink safely such that small amounts of food or liquid go to their lungs and cause trouble with breathing. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of antibiotics. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with an illness severity such that they drift in and out of consciousness some days and are expected to die in several months. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a breathing machine. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a life-threatening illness with 50% chance of survival provided that they receive support from a breathing machine for two weeks. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a tracheostomy and support from a breathing machine for at least two months to survive. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Decisional uncertainty will be evaluated using the uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0-100 such that 0 = extremely CERTAIN about best choice and 100 = extremely UNCERTAIN about the best choice. Higher values represent MORE UNCERTAINTY with decisions regarding feeding tubes, antibiotics, intubation, and tracheostomy while lower values represent LESS UNCERTAINTY.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that relying on a breathing machine is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept a feeding tube AND indicate that relying on a feeding tube is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.