Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluate the Impact of Afatinib on Quality of Life and Symptom Burden of Greek Subjects With Advanced NSCLC in Routine Patient Care Settings (NCT NCT02440854)

NCT ID: NCT02440854

Last Updated: 2022-04-27

Results Overview

Number of patients who experience a minimum clinically important improvement in symptoms is reported. A patient was categorized as having an improvement if the mean score of any two consecutive post-baseline Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) assessments for that patient was at least 10 points below the patient's ASBI score of LCSS at enrolment, over 6 months of treatment. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item is scored on a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with score reported from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions was not completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

80 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 6 months following start of treatment.

Results posted on

2022-04-27

Participant Flow

This was a non-interventional, multicentre, cohort study, based on new data collection, which included a representative sample of patients with advanced/metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece.

Patients were treated according to the local prescribing information of the study medication (afatinib, GIOTRIF®) and routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency and types of assessments performed. The assignment of the patient to this therapeutic strategy was not decided in advance by the study protocol but fell within current practice and the prescription of afatinib was clearly separated from the physician's decision to include the patient in the current study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Overall Study
STARTED
80
Overall Study
Analyzed
77
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
80

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Overall Study
Relocation of patient
1
Overall Study
Death
6
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
10
Overall Study
Afatinib discontinuation
46
Overall Study
stopped study at earlier timepoint
14
Overall Study
Study medication not received
1
Overall Study
Violation of inclusion criteria
2

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluate the Impact of Afatinib on Quality of Life and Symptom Burden of Greek Subjects With Advanced NSCLC in Routine Patient Care Settings

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Age, Continuous
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
77 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months following start of treatment.

Population: All eligible subjects that have received at least one dose of afatinib in the study and who had two consecutive post-baseline Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) assessments over the 6-month treatment period.

Number of patients who experience a minimum clinically important improvement in symptoms is reported. A patient was categorized as having an improvement if the mean score of any two consecutive post-baseline Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) assessments for that patient was at least 10 points below the patient's ASBI score of LCSS at enrolment, over 6 months of treatment. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item is scored on a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with score reported from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions was not completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=53 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients Who Experienced a Minimum Clinically Important Improvement in Symptoms Over 6 Months of Treatment
13 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated ASBI score of LCSS at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study) is reported. The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 8
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 30
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 36
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 42
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Baseline
14.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 2
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 4
9.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 6
7.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 10
7.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 12
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 18
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
Patient-rated Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) Score of Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Month 24
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated total LCSS score -defined as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items that comprise the LCSS- at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Each item was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 6
10.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Baseline
17.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 2
14.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.3
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 4
12.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 8
11.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 10
11.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 12
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.6
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 18
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 24
9.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 30
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 36
13.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
Patient-rated Total Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Score
Month 42
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Loss of appetite at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Loss of appetite was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Baseline
17.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 2
21.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 4
15.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 6
14.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 8
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 10
13.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 12
11.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 18
8.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 24
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 30
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 36
28.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.2
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Loss of Appetite
Month 42
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Fatigue at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Fatigue was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 42
6.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Baseline
27.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 2
22.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 4
20.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 6
16.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 8
17.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 10
17.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 12
14.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 18
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 24
14.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 30
12.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Fatigue
Month 36
25.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Cough at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Cough was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Baseline
14.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 2
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 4
8.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 6
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 8
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 10
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 12
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 18
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 24
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 30
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 36
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Cough
Month 42
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Dyspnoea at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Dyspnoea was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 4
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Baseline
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 2
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 6
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 8
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 10
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 12
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 18
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 24
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 30
8.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 36
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Dyspnoea
Month 42
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Haemoptysis at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Haemoptysis was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Baseline
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 4
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 6
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 8
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 10
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 12
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 18
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 24
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 30
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 36
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Haemoptysis
Month 42
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Pain at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Pain was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Baseline
12.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 2
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 4
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 6
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 8
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.2
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 10
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 12
6.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 18
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 24
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 30
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 36
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Pain
Month 42
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Overall symptomatic distress at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Overall symptomatic distress was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Baseline
16.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 2
15.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 4
17.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 6
13.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 8
14.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 10
12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 12
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 18
12.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 24
11.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 30
11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 36
8.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Overall Symptomatic Distress
Month 42
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Interference with normal activity at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Interference with normal activity was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 12
16.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Baseline
22.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 2
19.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 4
16.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 6
16.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 8
18.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 10
15.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 18
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 24
15.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 30
17.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.3
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 36
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.9
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Interference With Normal Activity
Month 42
13.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Patient-rated LCSS individual item scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL) at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The patient-rated scale consists of six symptom-specific questions that address loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis. Global Quality of Life (QoL) was scored on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores reported from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the best score. ASBI score was calculated by the mean of the 6 major lung cancer symptoms (loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, pain and haemoptysis). For a given assessment, if any of the six symptom-specific questions had not been completed, the ASBI score was not calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 30
23.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 36
36.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.1
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 42
12.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Baseline
29.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 2
27.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 4
23.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 6
23.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 8
26.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 10
24.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 12
21.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.0
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 18
18.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.8
Patient-rated Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Individual Item Scores: Global Quality of Life (QoL)
Month 24
22.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Mobility. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1="no problems"; 2="some problems"; 3= "extreme problems". Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 ("some problems") and level 3 ("extreme problems") with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 ("no problems").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Baseline
44.7 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 2
30.4 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 4
22.2 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 6
17.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 8
35.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 10
30.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 12
28.9 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 18
28.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 24
27.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 30
10.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 36
25.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Mobility
Month 42
0 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Self-care. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1="no problems"; 2="some problems"; 3= "extreme problems". Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 ("some problems") and level 3 ("extreme problems") with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 ("no problems").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Baseline
22.4 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 2
14.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 4
16.7 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 6
14.9 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 8
12.5 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 10
8.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 12
10.5 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 18
12.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 24
13.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 30
10.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 36
12.5 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Self-care
Month 42
0 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Usual activities. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1="no problems"; 2="some problems"; 3= "extreme problems". Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 ("some problems") and level 3 ("extreme problems") with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 ("no problems").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Baseline
39.5 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 2
33.9 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 4
29.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 6
21.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 8
30.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 10
27.8 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 12
31.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 18
24.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 24
13.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 30
40.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 36
12.5 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for theEuropean Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Usual Activities
Month 42
0 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Pain/discomfort. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1="no problems"; 2="some problems"; 3= "extreme problems". Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 ("some problems") and level 3 ("extreme problems") with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 ("no problems").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Baseline
47.4 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 2
25.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 4
16.7 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 6
14.9 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 8
30.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 10
25.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 12
28.9 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 18
20.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 24
22.7 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 30
30.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 36
25.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Pain/Discomfort
Month 42
0 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of patients with reported problems for the EQ-5D-3L utility index score dimension: Anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: 1="no problems"; 2="some problems"; 3= "extreme problems". Reported are the percentage of patients with problem, consisting of both level 2 ("some problems") and level 3 ("extreme problems") with the remaining subjects having reported level 1 ("no problems").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Baseline
51.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 2
64.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 4
59.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 6
53.2 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 8
50.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 10
55.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 12
47.4 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 18
48.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 24
63.6 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 30
50.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 36
50.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Reported Problems for the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Utility Index Score Dimension: Anxiety/Depression
Month 42
100 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

EQ-VAS score at enrolment and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). The EQ-VAS is a visual analogue scale (VAS) that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=76 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
EQ-VAS Score
Baseline
75.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.7
EQ-VAS Score
Month 2
75.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.0
EQ-VAS Score
Month 4
77.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.6
EQ-VAS Score
Month 6
77.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.6
EQ-VAS Score
Month 8
76.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8
EQ-VAS Score
Month 10
76.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.4
EQ-VAS Score
Month 12
80.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.1
EQ-VAS Score
Month 18
79.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
EQ-VAS Score
Month 24
78.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
EQ-VAS Score
Month 30
76.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.4
EQ-VAS Score
Month 36
85.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
EQ-VAS Score
Month 42
85.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated with one participant.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 0 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Baseline
59.7 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 2
79.4 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 4
83.1 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 6
76.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 8
72.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 10
73.8 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 12
72.5 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 18
80.8 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 24
69.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 30
100 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 36
100 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 0
Month 42
100 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 1 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Baseline
28.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 2
17.5 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 4
11.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 6
21.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 8
27.1 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 10
26.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 12
25.0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 18
15.4 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 24
26.1 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 30
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 36
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 1
Month 42
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 2 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Baseline
9.1 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 2
3.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 4
5.1 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 6
1.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 8
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 10
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 12
2.5 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 18
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 24
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 30
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 36
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 2
Month 42
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 3 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Baseline
1.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 2
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 4
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 6
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 8
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 10
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 12
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 18
3.8 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 24
4.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 30
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 36
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 3
Month 42
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and at month 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 post baseline.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who provided data to this endpoint.

Percentage of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score 4 at baseline and at the post-baseline predefined timepoints (i.e., every 2 months (± 3 weeks) during the first 12 months of therapy and every 6 months (±3 weeks) thereafter until the end of patient's participation in the study). ECOG has 6 grades (0-5, where 0 is the best possible score and 5 the worst): 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4. = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5. = Dead.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Baseline
1.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 2
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 4
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 6
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 8
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 10
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 12
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 18
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 24
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 30
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 36
0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score 4
Month 42
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who were evaluable for treatment adherence.

Ratio of afatinib tablets actually taken to doses prescribed over the study participation period. Ratio = doses taken / doses prescribed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=63 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Ratio of Afatinib Tablets Actually Taken to Doses Prescribed Over the Study Participation Period
0.99 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All subjects who were evaluable for treatment adherence and had missed doses. One participant can have multiple missing doses for multiple reasons.

Number of patients with a reason for missing afatinib tablets. One participant can have multiple missing doses for multiple reasons.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=11 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets
Patients' initiative due to adverse event
11 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets
Patient's negligence
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Missing Afatinib Tablets
Travel
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who discontinued treatment.

Number of patients with a reason for discontinuation of Afatinib throughout the study observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=56 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Adverse event
7 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Disease progression
43 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Lost to follow-up
4 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Patient's non-compliance
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Discontinuation of Afatinib
Physician's decision
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had treatment interruptions. One participant can have multiple interruptions for multiple reasons.

Number of patients with a reason for treatment interruptions throughout the study observation period. One participant can have multiple interruptions for multiple reasons.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=26 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Adverse event/Disease progression
24 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Physician's advice due to receipt of antibiotic therapy
2 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Surgery
2 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Travel
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Physician's decision while waiting for the liquid biopsy results
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Treatment Interruptions
Scheduled dental work
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects that have received at least one dose of Afatinib in the study.

Number of participants with Afatinib interruptions or dose modifications (i.e., a dose increase or decrease).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications
No interruptions/dosage modifications
42 Participants
Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications
Interruptions & Dosage modifications
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications
Dosage modifications only
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Afatinib Interruptions or Dose Modifications
Interruptions only
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had a dose reduction.

Number of patients with a reason for dose reduction throughout the study observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=26 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction
Adverse event/Disease progression
23 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction
Physician's decision (with no further specification)
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction
Physician's decision due to patient's impaired general health state
1 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Reduction
Physician's decision due to patient's impaired performance status
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 42 months.

Population: All eligible subjects who have been enrolled into the study regardless of whether or not they have finally completed their projected participation in the study and who had a dose increase.

Number of patients with a reason for dose increase throughout the study observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=3 Participants
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase
Physician's decision (with no further specification)
2 Participants
Number of Patients With a Reason for Dose Increase
Adverse event resolution
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib

Serious events: 49 serious events
Other events: 56 other events
Deaths: 7 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 participants at risk
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
2.6%
2/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
General disorders
Death
2.6%
2/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
General disorders
Pyrexia
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Infections and infestations
Lung abscess
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm progression
58.4%
45/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Nervous system disorders
Dementia
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
2.6%
2/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
1.3%
1/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
3.9%
3/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated With Afatinib
n=77 participants at risk
Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Greece treated with afatinib. Patients were treated as per the routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency, types of assessments performed and with adherence to the local prescribing requirements for afatinib. Patients were observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, defined as a maximum of 48 months after afatinib treatment initiation or until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, study completion or physician's decision whichever occurred earlier.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
64.9%
50/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
General disorders
Fatigue
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
7.8%
6/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
19.5%
15/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
5.2%
4/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
6.5%
5/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail dystrophy
7.8%
6/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
5.2%
4/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
5.2%
4/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
44.2%
34/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Xeroderma
5.2%
4/77 • Each participant was treated with afatinib and observed in the context of the study until the end of study participation, up to 42 months.
Sufficient data is available to support the evidence on the safety of the studied drug. For this reason, only the following Adverse events of interest were collected and reported: * all Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), * all AEs with fatal outcome, * all AEs which were relevant for a serious ADR or an AE with fatal outcome. Mortality reporting: all enrolled subjects AE reporting: all eligible enrolled subjects

Additional Information

Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center

Boehringer Ingelheim

Phone: 1-800-243-0127

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place