Anatomical, Radiological and Biomechanical Examination of Athletic Groin Pain Patients and Physical Therapy Intervention
NCT02437942 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 205
Last updated 2024-04-22
Summary
Athletic groin pain (AGP) is a chronic condition common in multi-directional sports (Walden et al. 2007, Robinson et al. 2004, Murphy et al. 2012). It is a complex injury with a challenging diagnosis. Dramatic differences in the anatomical diagnoses of AGP cohorts exist in the literature (Renstrom et al. 1980, Lovell et al. 1995, Holmich et al. 2007, Bradshaw et al. 2008). This may be due to the complexity of the anatomy in the region and the absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE) to confirm clinical examination.
Dynamic actions undertaken in field sports (including change of direction cutting) are particularly associated with the development of athletic groin pain (Holmich et al. 2014). Dynamic multi-plane, multi-joint actions can overload musculoskeletal and fascial structures in the hip and groin. Despite this, traditional groin pain assessments do not involve an examination of sport specific actions. An examination of jumping, hopping and cutting mechanics, which is possible with the use of three dimensional motion capture techniques, will provide additional information with which to diagnosis and rehabilitate athletes.
While the majority of published studies on AGP have focused on surgical management (Serner et al. 2015), exercise therapy has been found to be an effective treatment (Holmich et al. 1995). In exercise therapy studies the best results were shown by Holmich et al (1995) where subjects suffered for an average of 9.9 months with symptoms and a strength and stability program focused on adductor strength returned them to sport in 18.5 weeks. The latest paper on rehabilitation by Jardi et al. demonstrates little improvement with a mean time to return to training of 86 days +/-15. The focus remains on improving strength of isolated muscle groups and not attempting to address underlying biomechanical abnormalities that may be leading to overload. Accurate biomechanical assessment and individualized rehabilitation based on the high speed multiplanar movements that drive the athlete's symptoms may enhance the efficiency of rehabilitation. Moreover post-rehabilitation changes in biomechanical factors may provide a further insight into the biomechanical factors associated with AGP.
The purpose of this study was to:
1. Describe clinical presentation (physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings) for a group of athletes presenting with AGP
2. To describe the different biomechanical diagnoses that exist in AGP patients
3. To examine the effects of a biomechanics led exercise intervention to rehabilitate chronic groin pain
It is hypothesised that standardised magnetic resonance imaging will aid in the anatomical diagnosis of athletic groin pain patients. From a biomechanics perspective, distinct subgroups/clusters will exist that differ from each other in how they undertake dynamic sport specific actions. These distinct clusters will describe potential biomechanical diagnoses that exist in groin pain patients. A biomechanics led rehabilitation program will return groin pain patients back to sport more quickly than previous rehabilitation programs without biomechanical diagnostic information.
Brief protocol Participants will be recruited from patients with chronic athletic groin pain who present for investigation and rehabilitation at Sports Surgery Clinic, Ireland. A standardised clinical examination will be undertaken including range of motion assessment, pain provocation and load tolerance tests, and palpation.
A Magnetic Resonance Image of the hip and groin region will then be undertaken and read by a consultant sports physician.
Biomechanical assessment will include capturing of jumping, hopping and cutting mechanics through the use of three dimensional motion capture technology and force plates. Here reflective markers are placed on the skin at anatomical landmarks. These markers are picked up by the cameras and tracked at 200 frames per second. Participants will contact the force plate with their foot on undertaking the movements. Force and marker data will be combined to calculate joint angles and moments.
Physical therapy assessment will include an assessment of functional movement, range of motion testing, adductor squeeze tests, strength assessment of hip and trunk. Physiotherapists will utilise three dimensional biomechanical data during cutting and landing to inform individualised rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will consist of movement control, whole body strength and power, linear running mechanics, multi-directional mechanics and conditioning sessions. Participants will have follow up physical therapy appointments approximately every two weeks. A hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS) will be used to monitor the morbidity and severity of the injury throughout the rehabilitation process.
Once the physiotherapist determines that the patient is ready to return to play a biomechanical re-test will be undertaken.
Conditions
- Groin Pain
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Biomechanics led physical therapy rehabilitation
Rehabilitation intervention will consist of movement control (3 days per week), whole body strength and power (2 days per week), linear running mechanics (3 days per week), multi-directional mechanics (3 days per week), conditioning sessions (2 days per week). Rehabilitation will continue until physical therapist deems the athlete ready to return to sport.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Insight Centre for Data Analytics
collaborator OTHER -
Science Foundation Ireland
collaborator OTHER -
Sports Surgery Clinic, Santry, Dublin
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Andy D Franklyn-Miller, MBBS · Sports Surgery Clinic
-
Éanna C Falvey, MB, BCh, PhD · Sports Surgery Clinic
-
Enda A King, BSc, MSc · Sports Surgery Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 14 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2022-09-30
- Completion
- 2023-12-31
Countries
- Ireland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Clinical and Biomechanical Correlation During Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
NCT02686723 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbopelvic Movement Control: Effect of Injury History, and the Role of Cortical Control and Its Practical Application 2
NCT04861350 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute ACL Injuries
NCT05747079 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Acute Effects of an Isometric Loading Intervention on Lower Extremity Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Patellar Tendinopathy
NCT03262181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of IASTM and Proprioception
NCT03023943 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Definition of Biomechanical Indices Measurable During Sport Movements for the Prevention of Primary and Secondary ACL Injury
NCT03840551 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neuromuscular Intervention Targeted to Mechanisms of ACL Load in Female Athletes
NCT01034527 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Affecting the Speed of Recovery After ACL Reconstruction
NCT03770806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Tasks and Muscular Strength Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02771548 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effectiveness of Dry Needling and STM on Pain Management for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)
NCT03506685 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Design and Evaluation of an Active Intervention for the Prevention of Non-contact ACL Injury
NCT01021111 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Landing Biomechanics Following Fatigue in Athletes With and Without a History of Patellar Tendinopathy
NCT04339569 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Infrapatellar Strap Treatment on Pain Extent and Athletic Measures in Young Athletes
NCT01460004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Decreasing Knee Injury Risk Factors With Neuromuscular Training
NCT01433718 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
What is the Influence of Visual-motor Reliance on Planned and Unplanned Change of Direction Biomechanics 7 Months Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
NCT05141812 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Characterizing Clinical and Biomechanical Contributions to Function Following ACL Reconstruction
NCT03132987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Cognitive Dual-Tasking in Later Stages of Rehabilitation After ACL Reconstruction
NCT06206200 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Return to Sports After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07183475 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dynamic Q Angle and Core Endurance in Adolescent Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
NCT07328750 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effects of Early Rehabilitation Using Blood Flow Restriction and/or Surface Electromyography Biofeedback on Quadriceps Activation and Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07145606 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Muscle Function and Traumatic Knee Injury in Sports
NCT03479775 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Conservative Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement
NCT02368483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Ankle Support on Muscle Activation and Function
NCT01423513 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Two Physiotherapy Protocols Conventional X Accelerated in Individuals Undergoing Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.
NCT01821599 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Muscle Strength Loss and Its Effect on Knee Cap Motion in Volunteers With Anterior Knee Pain
NCT01862731 ·Status: COMPLETED