MedTrace Logo

Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) vs. Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT02415465 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 157

Last updated 2016-04-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Purpose: Compare continuous adductor canal block (CACB) to Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) for total knee arthroplasty in terms of mobility, post-operative pain, and analgesic use.

Hypothesis: CACB will provide better mobility than CSE post operatively.

Conditions

  • Arthroplasty

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Continuous Adductor Canal Block

Continuous Adductor Canal Block (0.2% ropivacaine running at 6-8mL/hr)

PROCEDURE

General

General Intraoperative Anesthesia

PROCEDURE

Epidural

Epidural (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 5 mcg/mL running at 6mL/hr with 1mL q15 bolus)

PROCEDURE

Spinal

Spinal Intraoperative Anesthesia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rush University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Craig J Della Valle, MD · Rush University Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-03-31
Completion
2016-03-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02415465 on ClinicalTrials.gov