Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Feasibility Study Evaluating the Use of a Non-invasive Ventilation Mask (NCT NCT02383719)
NCT ID: NCT02383719
Last Updated: 2016-05-16
Results Overview
With the questionnaire we desired to discern the clinicians perception of use of the experimental oro-nasal mask. The questionnaire featured the ease of installation, the ease of use, and the perceived comfort of the patient. Each of the scores were on a scale from 1-5 and each were recorded to be used for individual assessment. Thus each patient has multiple assessment scores individually reported as outcomes. The clinicians were asked on a scale of 1-5 please rate their agreement with the statements The mask was easy to use. 1 strongly disagree, 2 somewhat disagree, 3 neutral, 4 somewhat agree, 5 strongly agree Your perception of patient comfort was acceptable. 1 strongly disagree, 2 somewhat disagree, 3 neutral, 4 somewhat agree, 5 strongly agree
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
During non-invasive ventilation with the oro-nasal mask
2016-05-16
Participant Flow
Comfort of mask fit for patients receiving non-invasive ventilation at Shands hospital in Gainesville Florida
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Oro-nasal Mask
Oro-nasal Mask
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Feasibility Study Evaluating the Use of a Non-invasive Ventilation Mask
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Oro-nasal Mask
n=18 Participants
Oro-nasal Mask
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=39 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
18 participants
n=39 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During non-invasive ventilation with the oro-nasal maskWith the questionnaire we desired to discern the clinicians perception of use of the experimental oro-nasal mask. The questionnaire featured the ease of installation, the ease of use, and the perceived comfort of the patient. Each of the scores were on a scale from 1-5 and each were recorded to be used for individual assessment. Thus each patient has multiple assessment scores individually reported as outcomes. The clinicians were asked on a scale of 1-5 please rate their agreement with the statements The mask was easy to use. 1 strongly disagree, 2 somewhat disagree, 3 neutral, 4 somewhat agree, 5 strongly agree Your perception of patient comfort was acceptable. 1 strongly disagree, 2 somewhat disagree, 3 neutral, 4 somewhat agree, 5 strongly agree
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oro-nasal Mask
n=18 Participants
All patients in this group received the experimental oro-nasal mask for evaluation of use. Patient's received non-invasive ventilation were switched to this mask upone study initiation.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinician Assessment of Use With a Questionnaire
Ease of Use
|
5 units on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
|
|
Clinician Assessment of Use With a Questionnaire
Patient Comfort
|
4 units on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 5.0
|
Adverse Events
Oro-nasal Mask
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place