Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With Carboplatin+Nab-Paclitaxel in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (NCT NCT02367781)

NCT ID: NCT02367781

Last Updated: 2021-08-09

Results Overview

PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first documented disease progression as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first in the ITT-WT population.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

723 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to approximately 35 months after first patient enrolled

Results posted on

2021-08-09

Participant Flow

Participants in this study included: histologically or cytologically confirmed, Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC; and no prior treatment for Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. At the time of study completion a few participants that were still on maintenance treatment with atezolizumab were moved to another study, Post-Trial Access Program, or commercial use. Therefore, the reason for discontinuation was entered "Study terminated by Sponsor" for these participants.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Overall Study
STARTED
483
240
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
483
240

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
20
13
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
7
0
Overall Study
Randomized in Error
5
4
Overall Study
Non-Compliance
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
2
Overall Study
Death
330
176
Overall Study
Patient Moving to Roll-Over Study
17
5
Overall Study
Prolonged Hospitalization
1
0
Overall Study
Death Prior First Dose
1
0
Overall Study
Administrative-Change Facility
1
0
Overall Study
Request From Sponsor to Withdraw Patient in Survival Follow-Up
78
29
Overall Study
Patient Moved to Commercial Atezolizumab Use
14
9
Overall Study
Study Terminated by Sponsor
3
1
Overall Study
Patient Admitted to Hospital & Couldn't be Dosed for Randomization
1
0
Overall Study
Sponsor Decision
2
0
Overall Study
3 Year Treatment Completed, Immunotherapy Paused, Continuing Follow-Up Planned
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With Carboplatin+Nab-Paclitaxel in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=483 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=240 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Total
n=723 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=39 Participants
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=41 Participants
64.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
206 Participants
n=39 Participants
102 Participants
n=41 Participants
308 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
277 Participants
n=39 Participants
138 Participants
n=41 Participants
415 Participants
n=35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants
n=39 Participants
12 Participants
n=41 Participants
37 Participants
n=35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
426 Participants
n=39 Participants
213 Participants
n=41 Participants
639 Participants
n=35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
32 Participants
n=39 Participants
15 Participants
n=41 Participants
47 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
n=39 Participants
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
17 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants
n=39 Participants
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
26 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
428 Participants
n=39 Participants
222 Participants
n=41 Participants
650 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants
n=39 Participants
7 Participants
n=41 Participants
28 Participants
n=35 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first patient enrolled

Population: The ITT- WT population was defined as the ITT population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first documented disease progression as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first in the ITT-WT population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=456 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=229 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Determined by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in the ITT-WT Population
7.0 Months
Interval 6.3 to 7.3
5.5 Months
Interval 4.4 to 5.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first patient enrolled

Population: The ITT- WT population was defined as the ITT population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death from any cause in the ITT-WT population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=456 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=229 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Overall Survival (OS) in the ITT-WT Population
18.6 Months
Interval 15.8 to 21.2
13.9 Months
Interval 12.0 to 18.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population

PFS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first documented disease progression as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. The ITT population was defined as all randomized participants, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment. The PD-L1 expression population is defined as one of the following: PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 expression in baseline tumor tissue. The PD-L1 expression WT population is defined as the PD-L1 expression population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=483 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=240 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
PFS as Determined by the Investigator Using Recist v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
ITT Population
7.0 Months
Interval 6.3 to 7.3
5.6 Months
Interval 4.5 to 5.9
PFS as Determined by the Investigator Using Recist v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT Population
7.5 Months
Interval 7.0 to 9.1
5.7 Months
Interval 4.5 to 6.6
PFS as Determined by the Investigator Using Recist v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3-WT ITT Population
7.5 Months
Interval 7.0 to 9.0
5.9 Months
Interval 4.5 to 6.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 41 months after first subject enrolled

Population: The ITT population was defined as all randomized participants, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death from any cause in the ITT population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=483 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=240 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
OS as Determined by the Investigator Using Recist v1.1 in the ITT Population
17.0 Months
Interval 14.9 to 19.7
13.5 Months
Interval 11.9 to 17.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first patient enrolled

Population: PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population

OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and date of death from any cause in the PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population. The PD-L1 expression population is defined as one of the following: PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 expression in baseline tumor tissue. The PD-L1 expression WT population is defined as the PD-L1 expression population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=230 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=111 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
OS as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT Population
21.2 Months
Interval 17.3 to 28.2
16.9 Months
Interval 12.5 to 22.0
OS as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 WT ITT Population
21.2 Months
Interval 18.1 to 28.2
16.9 Months
Interval 12.5 to 22.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 41 months after first subject enrolled

Population: The ITT- WT population was defined as the ITT population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation

ORR (confirmation not required) is defined as the proportion of participants with an objective response, either CR or PR, with the use of RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator in the ITT-WT population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=452 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=227 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the ITT-WT Population
60.2 Percentage of participants
41.0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population

ORR (confirmation not required) is defined as proportion of participants with an objective response, either CR or PR, with the use of RECIST v1.1, as determined by investigator in ITT population, PD-L1 Expression population, and PD-L1 Expression WT population. ITT population was defined as all randomized participants, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment. PD-L1 expression population is defined as one of the following: PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 expression in baseline tumor tissue. PD-L1 expression WT population is defined as PD-L1 expression population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=479 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=237 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
ITT Population
59.1 Percentage of participants
42.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT WT Population
65.6 Percentage of participants
46.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Population, PD-L1 Expression Population, and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT Population
64.6 Percentage of participants
45.0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: ITT-WT Population, ITT Population, and PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-l1 Expression WT Population

DOR,defined for participants with objective response (OR) as time from 1st documented OR to documented disease progression as determined by investigator using RECIST v1.1,or death from any cause,whichever occurs 1st.ITT defined as all randomized participants,regardless of receipt of assigned treatment.ITT-WT defined as ITT population excluding participants with activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.PD-L1 expression population is defined as one of following:PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population,defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue;PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue;PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 population,defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 expression in baseline tumor tissue.PD-L1 expression WT is defined as PD-L1 expression population excluding participants with activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=283 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=100 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in ITT-WT Population, ITT Population, and PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
ITT Population
6.2 Months
Interval 5.6 to 7.9
5.4 Months
Interval 4.1 to 5.8
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in ITT-WT Population, ITT Population, and PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
ITT-WT Population
6.7 Months
Interval 5.6 to 8.0
5.4 Months
Interval 3.9 to 5.8
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in ITT-WT Population, ITT Population, and PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT Population
7.2 Months
Interval 5.7 to 9.0
5.0 Months
Interval 3.2 to 6.1
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 in ITT-WT Population, ITT Population, and PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT WT Population
7.2 Months
Interval 5.7 to 9.0
5.0 Months
Interval 3.2 to 6.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 41 months after first patient enrolled, years 1 and 2 reported

Population: The ITT- WT population was defined as the ITT population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. The ITT population was defined as all randomized participants, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

The OS rate at the 1- and 2-year landmark time points after randomization.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=483 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=240 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in ITT-WT Population and ITT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 ITT WT
62.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 57.53 to 66.51
54.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 48.04 to 61.08
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in ITT-WT Population and ITT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 2 ITT WT
40.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.64 to 45.22
32.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.8 to 38.92
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in ITT-WT Population and ITT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 ITT
61.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 57.29 to 66.02
54.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 48.09 to 60.84
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in ITT-WT Population and ITT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 2 ITT
39.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.1 to 44.37
32.21 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.79 to 38.63

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 35 months after first patient enrolled, years 1 and 2 reported

Population: PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population

The OS rate at the 1- and 2-year landmark time points after randomization in the PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population. The PD-L1 expression population is defined as one of the following: PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC2/3 or IC2/3 expression in baseline tumor tissue; PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 population, defined as ITT participants with PD-L1 IHC TC3 or IC3 expression in baseline tumor tissue. The PD-L1 expression WT population is defined as the PD-L1 expression population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=230 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=111 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT WT
68.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 62.56 to 75.13
62.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.07 to 71.94
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT
68.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 62.46 to 74.66
61.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 52.55 to 71.17
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 2 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT
44.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.99 to 53.27
35.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.25 to 48.72
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 1 and 2 in PD-L1 Expression Population and PD-L1 Expression WT Population
Event Free Rate (%) at Year 2 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT WT
44.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 34.86 to 53.18
35.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.06 to 48.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: The ITT- WT population was defined as the ITT population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Defined as time from randomization to confirmed deterioration (10-point change) on the combined European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) and supplemental lung cancer module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) symptom subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=451 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=228 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms in the ITT-WT Population
2.2 Months
Interval 1.8 to 3.1
1.9 Months
Interval 1.5 to 2.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) analysis were conducted on either the ITT-WT population or the PRO-evaluable WT population, defined as participants randomized into the ITT-WT population who completed a given PRO questionnaire at the baseline visit and at least one post-baseline visit.

Change from baseline per SILC scale will be analyzed for each lung cancer symptoms scores. SILC questionnaire comprises 3 individual symptoms \& are scored at individual symptom level, thus have a dyspnea score, chest pain score, \& cough score. There are a total of 9 questions in SILC questionnaire, each question has a minimum value of 0 \& maximum value of 4. Each individual symptom score is calculated as average of responses for symptom items. 'Chest pain' score is mean of question 1 \& 2, 'Cough' score is mean of question 3 \& 4 and 'Dyspnea' score is mean of question 5 to 9 in SILC questionnaire. An increase in score is suggestive of a worsening in symptomology. A score change of ≥0.3 points for dyspnea \& cough symptom scores is considered to be clinically significant; whereas a score change of≥0.5 points for chest pain score is considered to be clinically significant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=236 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=129 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 1
0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 3
-0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 8
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 9
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 14
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 15
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 19
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 21
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 22
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 23
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 24
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 26
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 29
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 31
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 33
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 48
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 77
-0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 6
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.67
0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 4
-0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 6
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 7
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
-0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 10
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 22
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 23
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 24
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
-0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 39
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 2
-0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 4
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 5
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 6
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 7
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 10
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 11
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 12
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 13
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 16
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 17
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 18
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 20
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 25
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 38
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 17
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 18
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 19
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 20
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 21
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 27
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 28
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 30
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 32
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 39
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 40
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 41
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 42
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 43
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 44
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 45
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 46
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 47
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 49
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 50
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 51
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 52
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 25
-0.49 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 26
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 27
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 28
-0.52 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 29
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 30
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 31
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 32
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 33
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
-0.52 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 34
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 35
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 36
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 37
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 38
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 40
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 41
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 53
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 54
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 55
-0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 56
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 57
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 58
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 59
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 60
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 61
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 62
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 63
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 64
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 65
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 66
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 67
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 68
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 69
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.89
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 70
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 71
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 72
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
-1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 73
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 74
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 75
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 76
0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 78
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 79
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 80
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 100
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 81
-0.59 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 82
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 83
-0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 84
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 85
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 86
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 87
-0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 88
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 89
-0.55 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 90
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 91
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 92
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 93
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 94
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 95
-0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 96
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 97
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 98
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 99
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 101
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 102
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 103
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 104
-0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 105
-1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 106
-1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 107
-1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 108
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 109
-0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 110
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 111
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 112
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 113
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 114
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 115
0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 116
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 117
0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 118
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 119
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 120
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 121
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 122
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 123
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 124
0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 125
0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 1
0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 2
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 3
0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 4
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Survival Follow-Up Month 5
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
-0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 1
0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 2
0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 42
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 43
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 44
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 45
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 46
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 47
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 48
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 49
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 50
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 51
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 52
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 53
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 54
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 55
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 56
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 57
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 58
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 59
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 60
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 61
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 62
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 63
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 71
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 64
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.87
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 65
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 66
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 67
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 68
-0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 69
-0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.61
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 70
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.61
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 72
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 73
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 74
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 75
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 76
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 77
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 78
-0.52 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 79
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 80
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 81
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 82
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 83
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 84
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 85
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
1.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 86
-0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 87
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 88
-0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 89
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 90
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 91
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 92
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 93
-0.55 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
0.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 94
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 95
0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 96
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 97
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 98
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 99
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 100
-0.58 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 101
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 102
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 103
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 104
-0.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 105
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 106
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 107
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 108
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 109
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 110
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 111
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 112
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 113
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 114
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 115
0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 116
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 117
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 118
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 119
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 120
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 121
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 122
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 123
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 124
0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 125
0.50 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 1
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 2
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 3
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 4
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
-0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 5
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Survival Follow-Up Month 6
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 1
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 2
0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 3
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 4
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 5
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 6
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 7
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 8
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 9
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 10
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 11
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 12
0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
0.74 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 13
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
0.76 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 14
0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 15
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.71 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 16
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 17
0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 18
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 19
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 20
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 21
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 34
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 22
0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 23
0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 24
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 25
0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 26
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 27
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 28
0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 29
0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 30
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 31
0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 32
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 33
0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 34
0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 35
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 36
0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
0.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 37
0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 38
0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 39
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 40
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 41
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 42
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 43
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 44
0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 45
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 46
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 47
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 48
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 49
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 50
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 51
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 52
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 53
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 54
0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 55
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 56
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 57
0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 58
0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 59
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 60
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 61
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 62
0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 63
0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
0.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 64
0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 65
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.68
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 66
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 67
0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 68
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 69
0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
0.73 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 70
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.73 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 71
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 72
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 73
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 74
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 75
0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 76
0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 77
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 78
0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 79
0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 80
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 81
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.80 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 82
0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.80 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 83
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 84
0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 85
0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
-0.80 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 86
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 87
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 88
0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 89
0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 90
0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 91
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
-1.00 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 92
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-0.80 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 93
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-0.80 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 94
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 95
0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 96
0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 97
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 98
0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 99
0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 100
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 101
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 102
0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 103
0.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 104
0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 105
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 106
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 107
-0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 108
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 109
0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 110
0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 111
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 112
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 113
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 114
0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 115
0.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 116
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 117
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 118
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 119
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 120
0.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 121
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 122
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 123
-0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 124
-0.20 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Week 125
0.20 Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 1
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 2
0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
0.46 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 3
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 4
0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 5
0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Dyspnoea, Survival Follow-Up Month 6
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 35
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 36
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Chest Pain, Week 37
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 3
0.02 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 5
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 8
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 9
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 11
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 12
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 13
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 14
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 15
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale
Cough, Week 16
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 69 months after first patient enrolled

Population: The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.

Percentage of participants with at least one adverse event. Adverse event onset date before cross over.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=473 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=232 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
99.6 Percentage of participants
98.7 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately 35 months after first subject enrolled

Population: The baseline ADA-evaluable population included participants who had a baseline ADA result. The post-baseline ADA-evaluable population included participants who had at least one post-baseline ADA result and who had received at least one dose of study treatment. The ADA-evaluable WT population was defined as the ADA-evaluable population excluding participants with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Baseline prevalence and post-baseline incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to Atezolizumab in the Arm A (Atezolizumab + Carboplatin or Cisplatin + Pemetrexed) and Arm B Carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel Crossover Participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=473 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=96 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab
Baseline
3.1 Perecentage of participants
4.8 Perecentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab
Post-baseline
22.4 Perecentage of participants
23.5 Perecentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)

Population: The PK-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received any dose of atezolizumab, carboplatin, or nab-paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples.

Predose samples will be collected on the same day of treatment administration. The infusion duration of atezolizumab will be of 30-60 minutes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=465 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab for Patients in Atezolizumab+Carboplatin+Nab-Paclitaxel Arm
Cycle 1 Day 1
392 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 114
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab for Patients in Atezolizumab+Carboplatin+Nab-Paclitaxel Arm
Cycle 3 Day 1
454 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 170

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 21, Cycle 2 Day 21, Cycle 3 Day 21, and Cycle 7 Day 21 (Cycle length = 21 days)

Population: The PK-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received any dose of atezolizumab, carboplatin, or nab-paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples.

Predose samples will be collected on the same day of treatment administration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=465 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Atezolizumab+Carboplain+Nab-Paclitaxel
Cycle 1 Day 21
70.9 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 35.1
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Atezolizumab+Carboplain+Nab-Paclitaxel
Cycle 2 Day 21
111 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 52.2
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Atezolizumab+Carboplain+Nab-Paclitaxel
Cycle 3 Day 21
134 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 57.8
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Atezolizumab+Carboplain+Nab-Paclitaxel
Cycle 7 Day 21
218 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 93.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of carboplatin infusion, 1 hour after carboplatin infusion (infusion duration=15 to 30 minutes) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 3 (1 Cycle=21 days) (up to approximately 35 months)

Population: The PK-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received any dose of atezolizumab, carboplatin, or nab-paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=29 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=20 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-dose
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the level of detection.
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the level of detection.
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 1 Day 1 Before End of Infusion
20,500 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7500
17,000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5200
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 1 Day 1 Post Infusion
11,900 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3100
12,400 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3800
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 3 Day 1 Pre-dose
169 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 63.8
160 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 48.8
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 3 Day 1 Before End of Infusion
15,300 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6600
17,800 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7550
Plasma Concentrations of Carboplatin
Cycle 3 Day 1 Post Infusion
11,400 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3060
13,400 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6650

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of nab-paclitaxel infusion, 1 hour after nab-paclitaxel infusion (infusion duration=30 minutes) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 3 (1 Cycle=21 days) (up to approximately 35 months)

Population: The PK-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received any dose of atezolizumab, carboplatin, or nab-paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=30 Participants
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=20 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants will receive best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed is also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 will be given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 3 Day 1 Before End of Infusion
4480 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3520
2030 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1690
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 3 Day 1 Post Infusion
357 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 253
447 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 322
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-dose
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the level of detection.
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the level of detection.
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 1 Day 1 Before End of Infusion
3520 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2210
2530 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1420
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 1 Day 1 Post Infusion
307 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 153
417 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 217
Plasma Concentrations of Nab-Paclitaxel Reported as Total Paclitaxel
Cycle 3 Day 1 Pre-dose
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the threshold of the assay.
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Below the threshold of the assay.

Adverse Events

Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Serious events: 252 serious events
Other events: 467 other events
Deaths: 338 deaths

Arm B Without Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Serious events: 63 serious events
Other events: 127 other events
Deaths: 108 deaths

Arm B With Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin, After Crossover Atezo Monotherapy)

Serious events: 24 serious events
Other events: 100 other events
Deaths: 70 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=473 participants at risk
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B Without Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=131 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed was also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 were given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression. This Arm B group includes participants who did not crossover to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy.
Arm B With Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin, After Crossover Atezo Monotherapy)
n=101 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed was also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 were given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression. This Arm B group includes participants who crossed over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
AGRANULOCYTOSIS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HEPATOCELLULAR INJURY
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
3.0%
14/473 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
1.9%
9/473 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
HAEMOLYTIC URAEMIC SYNDROME
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LEUKOPENIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
NEUTROPENIA
3.0%
14/473 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
PANCYTOPENIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
THROMBOCYTOPENIA
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
ANGINA UNSTABLE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
ATRIAL FLUTTER
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
BRADYCARDIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ANEURYSM
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ARREST
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE CHRONIC
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC TAMPONADE
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ARREST
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
PALPITATIONS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Cardiac disorders
VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
VERTIGO
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Endocrine disorders
ADDISON'S DISEASE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Endocrine disorders
GLUCOCORTICOID DEFICIENCY
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Endocrine disorders
HYPOTHYROIDISM
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
3.0%
14/473 • Number of events 14 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DUODENAL ULCER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTRITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROINTESTINAL VASCULAR MALFORMATION HAEMORRHAGIC
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ILEUS PARALYTIC
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
IMMUNE-MEDIATED ENTEROCOLITIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
LARGE INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
LARGE INTESTINAL STENOSIS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
MELAENA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
1.1%
5/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
OESOPHAGEAL FOOD IMPACTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
STOMATITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
CHEST PAIN
1.1%
5/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
DEATH
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
DRUG INTERACTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
FATIGUE
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
GENERAL PHYSICAL HEALTH DETERIORATION
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
GENERALISED OEDEMA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
PAIN
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
PERFORMANCE STATUS DECREASED
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
PYREXIA
1.7%
8/473 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
SUDDEN DEATH
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
IMMUNE-MEDIATED HEPATITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
BILE DUCT STONE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLECYSTITIS ACUTE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLESTASIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HEPATIC CIRRHOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HEPATITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CELLULITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Immune system disorders
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS PERFORATED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
ATYPICAL PNEUMONIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
BACTERAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
BACTERIAL COLITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
BACTERIAL SEPSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE COLITIS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CONJUNCTIVITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CYSTITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS COLITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
DEVICE RELATED INFECTION
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
DIVERTICULITIS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
ENCEPHALITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
ERYSIPELAS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
FEBRILE INFECTION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
FURUNCLE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
GANGRENE
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
INFECTION
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
INFECTIOUS PLEURAL EFFUSION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
1.1%
5/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
NEUTROPENIC INFECTION
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
PARAPHARYNGEAL SPACE INFECTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
9.5%
45/473 • Number of events 55 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
13/131 • Number of events 15 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
PULMONARY SEPSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
SEPSIS
1.5%
7/473 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
SEPTIC SHOCK
1.1%
5/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
STAPHYLOCOCCAL SEPSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
TOOTH INFECTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
TRACHEOBRONCHITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
UROSEPSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
VASCULAR DEVICE INFECTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FEMUR FRACTURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
INFUSION RELATED REACTION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LUMBAR VERTEBRAL FRACTURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
PELVIC FRACTURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPINAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPINAL FRACTURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
UPPER LIMB FRACTURE
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
BLOOD ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE INCREASED
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
BLOOD CREATININE INCREASED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
BLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
LIPASE INCREASED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
LYMPHOCYTE COUNT DECREASED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
NEUTROPHIL COUNT DECREASED
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
PLATELET COUNT DECREASED
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
WHITE BLOOD CELL COUNT DECREASED
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DIABETES MELLITUS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERKALAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOALBUMINAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOCALCAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOMAGNESAEMIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPONATRAEMIA
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BONE PAIN
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULAR WEAKNESS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL CHEST PAIN
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SPINAL PAIN
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
ADENOCARCINOMA OF COLON
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
SARCOMA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
TUMOUR PAIN
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
ATAXIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
EMBOLIC STROKE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
EPILEPSY
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
HEMIPARESIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
ISCHAEMIC STROKE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
LETHARGY
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
PARAESTHESIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
SEIZURE
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
TOXIC NEUROPATHY
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
VASOGENIC CEREBRAL OEDEMA
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
CONFUSIONAL STATE
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
DISORIENTATION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
MENTAL STATUS CHANGES
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
0.85%
4/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
AUTOIMMUNE NEPHRITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
NEPHRITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
2.5%
12/473 • Number of events 12 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
NEPHROLITHIASIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
NEPHROPATHY TOXIC
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
POSTRENAL FAILURE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE
1.1%
5/473 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
TUBULOINTERSTITIAL NEPHRITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Renal and urinary disorders
URINARY RETENTION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
VAGINAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ASPIRATION
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ASTHMA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
2.7%
13/473 • Number of events 22 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
EPISTAXIS
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HAEMOPTYSIS
1.3%
6/473 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HYPOXIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
LUNG DISORDER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ORGANISING PNEUMONIA
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
OROPHARYNGEAL DISCOMFORT
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PLEURAL EFFUSION
1.7%
8/473 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMONITIS
1.9%
9/473 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMOTHORAX
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMOTHORAX SPONTANEOUS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
3.6%
17/473 • Number of events 18 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY HAEMORRHAGE
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RESPIRATORY FAILURE
0.63%
3/473 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DRUG ERUPTION
0.00%
0/473 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN ULCER
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Surgical and medical procedures
ABORTION INDUCED
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
EMBOLISM
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
FEMORAL ARTERY ANEURYSM
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
HYPOTENSION
0.42%
2/473 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
JUGULAR VEIN THROMBOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
PHLEBITIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
VASCULAR STENOSIS
0.21%
1/473 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=473 participants at risk
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
Arm B Without Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
n=131 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed was also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 were given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression. This Arm B group includes participants who did not crossover to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy.
Arm B With Crossover Participants (Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin, After Crossover Atezo Monotherapy)
n=101 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of carboplatin on Day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression whichever occurs first during induction treatment phase. Participants received best supportive care during maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed was also permitted. Participants who were consented prior to approval of protocol Version 5 were given the option to cross over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression. This Arm B group includes participants who crossed over to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
54.8%
259/473 • Number of events 357 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
51.1%
67/131 • Number of events 79 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
49.5%
50/101 • Number of events 55 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LEUKOPENIA
10.8%
51/473 • Number of events 92 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
13/131 • Number of events 22 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
NEUTROPENIA
45.0%
213/473 • Number of events 424 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
39.7%
52/131 • Number of events 95 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
52.5%
53/101 • Number of events 99 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
THROMBOCYTOPENIA
27.9%
132/473 • Number of events 210 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
22.1%
29/131 • Number of events 49 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
30.7%
31/101 • Number of events 47 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Endocrine disorders
HYPOTHYROIDISM
10.8%
51/473 • Number of events 55 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Eye disorders
VISION BLURRED
5.3%
25/473 • Number of events 28 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
11.4%
54/473 • Number of events 67 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
9/131 • Number of events 11 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
5.3%
25/473 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
37.2%
176/473 • Number of events 224 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
29.0%
38/131 • Number of events 47 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
32.7%
33/101 • Number of events 42 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
41.4%
196/473 • Number of events 321 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
28.2%
37/131 • Number of events 61 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
34.7%
35/101 • Number of events 41 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DRY MOUTH
5.1%
24/473 • Number of events 24 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPEPSIA
7.0%
33/473 • Number of events 34 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
5.1%
24/473 • Number of events 25 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
49.9%
236/473 • Number of events 354 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
46.6%
61/131 • Number of events 85 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
43.6%
44/101 • Number of events 65 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
STOMATITIS
8.5%
40/473 • Number of events 45 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.1%
8/131 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
27.5%
130/473 • Number of events 228 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
19.1%
25/131 • Number of events 38 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
17.8%
18/101 • Number of events 30 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
18.8%
89/473 • Number of events 133 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
14.5%
19/131 • Number of events 26 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
20.8%
21/101 • Number of events 29 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
CHEST PAIN
7.0%
33/473 • Number of events 43 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
7.6%
10/131 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
CHILLS
5.3%
25/473 • Number of events 32 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
FATIGUE
48.2%
228/473 • Number of events 297 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
43.5%
57/131 • Number of events 73 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
51.5%
52/101 • Number of events 61 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION
5.1%
24/473 • Number of events 26 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL
15.0%
71/473 • Number of events 81 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.7%
14/131 • Number of events 17 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.9%
11/101 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
PAIN
6.3%
30/473 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
General disorders
PYREXIA
16.9%
80/473 • Number of events 104 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.2%
12/131 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
10/101 • Number of events 15 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
6.1%
29/473 • Number of events 30 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
8.0%
38/473 • Number of events 61 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
7.8%
37/473 • Number of events 41 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
7.4%
35/473 • Number of events 55 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.1%
8/131 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
13.3%
63/473 • Number of events 91 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
9/131 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
10/101 • Number of events 11 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
5.1%
24/473 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
5.5%
26/473 • Number of events 42 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
9/131 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
BLOOD CREATININE INCREASED
5.7%
27/473 • Number of events 32 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 11 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
NEUTROPHIL COUNT DECREASED
19.7%
93/473 • Number of events 188 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
13.7%
18/131 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
16.8%
17/101 • Number of events 29 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
PLATELET COUNT DECREASED
22.8%
108/473 • Number of events 179 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
16.8%
22/131 • Number of events 29 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
15.8%
16/101 • Number of events 32 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
13.3%
63/473 • Number of events 71 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
11.5%
15/131 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
12.9%
13/101 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
WHITE BLOOD CELL COUNT DECREASED
10.4%
49/473 • Number of events 80 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
9/131 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 12 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
30.4%
144/473 • Number of events 169 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
26.0%
34/131 • Number of events 36 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
29.7%
30/101 • Number of events 34 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
11.0%
52/473 • Number of events 73 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
13.0%
17/131 • Number of events 27 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
16.3%
77/473 • Number of events 98 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.2%
12/131 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
11.9%
12/101 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOMAGNESAEMIA
19.9%
94/473 • Number of events 130 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
17.6%
23/131 • Number of events 27 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
16.8%
17/101 • Number of events 23 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPONATRAEMIA
6.6%
31/473 • Number of events 54 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.1%
8/131 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
23.9%
113/473 • Number of events 161 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
14.5%
19/131 • Number of events 20 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
16.8%
17/101 • Number of events 20 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
18.8%
89/473 • Number of events 105 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
9/131 • Number of events 9 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULAR WEAKNESS
5.3%
25/473 • Number of events 27 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.1%
8/131 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
10.6%
50/473 • Number of events 60 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
12.9%
61/473 • Number of events 72 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
16.5%
78/473 • Number of events 90 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.7%
14/131 • Number of events 21 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.9%
11/101 • Number of events 15 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
DYSGEUSIA
9.1%
43/473 • Number of events 46 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
18.0%
85/473 • Number of events 106 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.2%
12/131 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.9%
11/101 • Number of events 13 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
NEUROPATHY PERIPHERAL
11.8%
56/473 • Number of events 58 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
13/131 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
PARAESTHESIA
9.1%
43/473 • Number of events 51 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Nervous system disorders
PERIPHERAL SENSORY NEUROPATHY
12.7%
60/473 • Number of events 71 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
7.6%
10/131 • Number of events 14 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
12.9%
13/101 • Number of events 15 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
ANXIETY
6.8%
32/473 • Number of events 32 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
6.1%
29/473 • Number of events 29 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
14.8%
70/473 • Number of events 76 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
11.5%
15/131 • Number of events 17 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
15.8%
16/101 • Number of events 16 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
28.5%
135/473 • Number of events 162 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
16.0%
21/131 • Number of events 21 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
17.8%
18/101 • Number of events 21 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
28.3%
134/473 • Number of events 181 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
21.4%
28/131 • Number of events 30 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
22.8%
23/101 • Number of events 29 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
EPISTAXIS
14.6%
69/473 • Number of events 84 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
13.0%
17/131 • Number of events 18 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
9.9%
10/101 • Number of events 12 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HAEMOPTYSIS
6.3%
30/473 • Number of events 42 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMONITIS
5.1%
24/473 • Number of events 26 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/131 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.00%
0/101 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PRODUCTIVE COUGH
7.4%
35/473 • Number of events 44 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ALOPECIA
32.1%
152/473 • Number of events 155 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
25.2%
33/131 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
29.7%
30/101 • Number of events 30 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DRY SKIN
5.9%
28/473 • Number of events 31 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PRURITUS
12.9%
61/473 • Number of events 81 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH
15.4%
73/473 • Number of events 86 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
10.9%
11/101 • Number of events 12 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
HYPERTENSION
5.5%
26/473 • Number of events 33 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 4 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 6 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Vascular disorders
HYPOTENSION
7.2%
34/473 • Number of events 43 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
VERTIGO
3.6%
17/473 • Number of events 21 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Investigations
ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
4.2%
20/473 • Number of events 30 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
6.1%
8/131 • Number of events 10 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOPHOSPHATAEMIA
4.2%
20/473 • Number of events 32 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH MACULO-PAPULAR
4.2%
20/473 • Number of events 21 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 8 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • From the first study drug to the data cutoff date: 18 January 2021 (approximately 69 months)
The safety-evaluable population included all treated participants, defined as randomized participants who received any protocol treatment. For the safety analyses, participants were grouped according to whether any full or partial dose of atezolizumab was received, including when atezolizumab was received in error. Specifically, for participants randomized to the CnP arm, if atezolizumab was received in error, the participants were grouped to the Atezo+CnP arm for the safety analyses.

Additional Information

Medical Communications

Hoffmann-La Roche

Phone: 800-821-8590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER