Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol Versus Atenolol on the Proliferative Phase of Infantile Hemangioma (NCT NCT02342275)
NCT ID: NCT02342275
Last Updated: 2022-06-16
Results Overview
Changes in IH size and color were classified as a complete response, nearly complete response, partial response or no response. The primary outcome measure was any response at 6 months in the intention-to-treat population of all patients who underwent randomization. The any response included compete, nearly complete and partial responses. A complete response was defined as no redundant tissue or telangiectasia was identified. A nearly complete response was defined as a minimal degree of telangiectasis, erythema and skin thickening. A partial response was defined as a size reduction or change in color that did not meet the nearly complete resolution criteria.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
377 participants
6 month
2022-06-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Propranolol
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
190
|
187
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
184
|
182
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Total
n=377 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
190 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
187 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
377 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
10.2 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=190 Participants
|
9.8 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=187 Participants
|
10.0 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.047 • n=377 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
146 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
287 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
44 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
190 Participants
n=190 Participants
|
187 Participants
n=187 Participants
|
377 Participants
n=377 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthChanges in IH size and color were classified as a complete response, nearly complete response, partial response or no response. The primary outcome measure was any response at 6 months in the intention-to-treat population of all patients who underwent randomization. The any response included compete, nearly complete and partial responses. A complete response was defined as no redundant tissue or telangiectasia was identified. A nearly complete response was defined as a minimal degree of telangiectasis, erythema and skin thickening. A partial response was defined as a size reduction or change in color that did not meet the nearly complete resolution criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Primary Outcome Measure Was Any Response at 6 Months
|
178 Participants
|
173 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeksHAS was measured at baseline and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, including the degree of deep swelling, the color of the hemangioma, and the ulceration assessment: 1. Assessment of the degree of swelling. It was scored as follows: * 6 points if the swelling was tense; * 4 points if the swelling was'neutral; * 2 points when the swelling was reduced by 50% or more at follow-up; or * 0 point when there was no more visible swelling at a follow-up. 2. Assessment of the color of the IH. * 5 points if the hemangioma lesion was bright red all over; * 3 points if the hemangioma lesion was matte red or reddish-purple; * 1 point if the hemangioma lesion was totally or partially gray; * 0 points if the hemangioma lesion was totally or partially skin-colored after involution. (2) Assessment of the ulceration. -0.5 point for an ulcer ≤1.0 cm2; * One point for an ulcer \>1.0 cm2 but \<25 cm2; * Two points for an ulcer ≥25 cm2. The HAS score= (Swelling score + color score)/2 +Ulceration score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS)
Baseline
|
4.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
4.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS)
Week 1
|
3.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
3.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS)
Week 4
|
2.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
2.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
|
Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS)
Week 12
|
1.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
1.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS)
Week 24
|
0.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
0.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 week after treatmentA successful initial response was defined as a HAS score decrease at 1 week after treatment. A successful initial response was assessed by using HAS in the intention-to-treat population. Previous studies demonstrated that HAS decreases over time after β-blocker treatment, with a dramatic drop occurring in the first week, indicating an immediate therapeutic response. HAS can reflect the rapid effect of β-blocker (either propranolol or atenolol) therapy shortly after initiation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Initial Response
|
171 Participants
|
163 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from the first dosage of propranolol or atenolol until complete healing ofthe hemangioma ulceration.The complete healing time of the ulceration was defined as the time from the first dosage of propranolol or atenolol until complete healing of the hemangioma ulceration (assessed up to 6 months). Ulceration is defined as a break in the integrity of the hemangioma surface epithelium (or skin) with or without infection. The information included the extent of ulceration, complications of ulceration, prior duration of ulceration (before treatment), concurrent treatments, and complete healing time. Prior duration of ulceration was defined as the time from the first sign of ulceration until before β-blocker treatment. The complete healing time of the ulceration was defined as the time from the first dosage of propranolol or atenolol until complete healing of the hemangioma ulceration. Concurrent treatments, including oral pain medication, oral antibiotics, topical ointment antibiotics and/or wound dressings, were permitted to treat ulcerated IH and were recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Ulceration Healing Time
|
4.94 weeks
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
4.82 weeks
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: between weeks 24 and 96Population: Data only included patients who attempted to discontinue β-blockers according to the treatment plan between weeks 24 and 96
Regrowth of more than 20% in hemangioma appearance (including changes in color and/or volume) after stopping the medication was considered significant rebound. The inclusion criteria for rebound analysis were as follows: (1) patients who completed 6 months of treatment and (2) patients who discontinued therapy or were tapering treatment after achieving an any response. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who were noncompliant with treatment and (2) patients who did not respond to treatment. Whether a patient had hemangioma rebound was based on the site investigators' assessments after the week 24 treatment. In patients with significant rebound, reinitiation of systemic therapy (either propranolol or atenolol) was recommended. Minor rebound, which was defined as those patients in whose rebound was noted but no reinitiation of systemic therapy or further treatment was necessary, was not included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=170 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=160 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rebound Rate
|
19 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 96 weekA complete/nearly complete response at week 96 was considered median-term efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 Participants
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 Participants
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complete/Nearly Complete Response (96 Week)
|
156 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Propranolol
Atenolol
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 participants at risk
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 participants at risk
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sleep disturbance
|
1.1%
2/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.00%
0/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiolitis
|
1.1%
2/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial hyperreactivity
|
0.53%
1/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.00%
0/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Propranolol
n=190 participants at risk
Propranolol
Propranolol: Initiated at a dosage of 1 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily for 1 week, and then increased to 2 mg/kg per day divided 3 times daily from weeks 2 to 24.
|
Atenolol
n=187 participants at risk
Atenolol
Atenolol: Initiated at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg per day in a single dose for 1 week, and then increased to 1 mg/kg per day in a single dose from weeks 2 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
13.2%
25/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
14.4%
27/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sleep disturbance
|
13.2%
25/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
4.8%
9/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
8.4%
16/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
2.7%
5/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Cool extremities
|
7.4%
14/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
3.2%
6/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
6.8%
13/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
4.8%
9/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.7%
7/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
2.7%
5/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
4.7%
9/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
2.1%
4/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiolitis
|
2.1%
4/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
1.1%
2/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Decreased appetite
|
3.7%
7/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
2.7%
5/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.1%
4/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
3.2%
6/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.6%
3/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
1.1%
2/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial hyperreactivity
|
0.53%
1/190 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
0.00%
0/187 • Adverse events during the initial 6 months of treatment were compared between the 2 groups.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place