MedTrace Logo

Dressing Versus Glue (2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate) for Coverage of the Skin Incision After Closure During Cesarean Delivery

NCT02323711 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2015-03-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is investigating the relative risks and benefits of using two common materials for coverage of the skin incision at cesarean delivery. We will perform the first prospective and the first randomized controlled trial examining the use of a standard postoperative dressing versus skin glue for coverage of the closed skin incision after cesarean delivery. The hypothesis is that using skin glue for coverage of the incision will be associated with decreased wound complications and increased patient satisfaction.

Conditions

  • Pregnant Women
  • Cesarean Section

Interventions

DEVICE

2-octyl cyanoacrylate

If the subject is allocated to the experimental group, they would receive 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in place of a primary dressing consisting of their non-adherent composite dressing (Tefla) and a secondary dressing of Army Battle Dressing (ABD).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Danbury Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-03-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02323711 on ClinicalTrials.gov