Trial Outcomes & Findings for Postmarketing Study to Evaluate add-on Therapy With Anticholinergics in Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) on Mirabegron. (NCT NCT02294396)
NCT ID: NCT02294396
Last Updated: 2024-10-31
Results Overview
TEAEs were defined as AEs observed after the first administration of the study drugs for the treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
649 participants
From first dose of study drug up to week 52
2024-10-31
Participant Flow
Participants with overactive bladder (OAB) were enrolled in 60 sites in Japan.
Prior to randomization, participants received 50 mg mirabegron orally once daily after breakfast for 2 weeks during a screening period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
167
|
161
|
161
|
160
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
127
|
128
|
126
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
40
|
33
|
35
|
37
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
26
|
25
|
21
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Electrocardiogram adviser's judgment
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Deviation
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Miscellaneous
|
2
|
0
|
5
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
Total
n=647 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=166 Participants
|
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=161 Participants
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 • n=161 Participants
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=159 Participants
|
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=647 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
146 Participants
n=166 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=159 Participants
|
570 Participants
n=647 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=166 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=159 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=647 Participants
|
|
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS)
|
7.4 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=166 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.7 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=161 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.8 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=161 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.7 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=159 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
7.6 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=647 Participants • Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drugs for the treatment period and who provided evaluable efficacy data for at least 1 variable before and after the start of the treatment period. Participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Score: Symptom Severity
|
32.81 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.78 • n=166 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
32.36 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.23 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
32.92 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.45 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
34.23 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.60 • n=159 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
33.08 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.00 • n=647 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
OAB-q SF Score: Total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
|
75.16 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.65 • n=166 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
77.36 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.11 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
74.85 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.50 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
75.37 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.33 • n=159 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
75.68 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.91 • n=647 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Number of Micturitions per 24 Hours
|
10.06 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59 • n=166 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.37 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.65 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.13 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.20 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62 • n=159 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
10.19 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69 • n=647 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Number of Urgency Episodes per 24 Hours
|
3.26 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46 • n=153 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.12 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67 • n=148 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.27 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.20 • n=150 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.15 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.54 • n=148 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
3.20 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.47 • n=599 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes per 24 Hours
|
1.62 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=91 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.59 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83 • n=95 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.47 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35 • n=103 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.55 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76 • n=96 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.56 incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=385 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes per 24 Hours
|
1.55 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47 • n=80 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.39 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45 • n=82 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.30 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16 • n=86 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.31 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=85 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.38 urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43 • n=333 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Volume Voided per Micturition
|
166.600 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.404 • n=166 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
170.064 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.781 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
169.309 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.324 • n=161 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
167.542 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.320 • n=159 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
168.368 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.839 • n=647 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes per Night
|
1.50 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 • n=142 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.68 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08 • n=133 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.61 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 • n=141 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.67 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04 • n=132 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
1.61 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.10 • n=548 Participants • FAS participants with available data are included in the analysis.
|
|
Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
|
11.02 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.43 • n=166 Participants
|
10.43 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.07 • n=161 Participants
|
9.74 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.35 • n=161 Participants
|
9.10 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41 • n=159 Participants
|
10.08 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.34 • n=647 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to week 52Population: SAF
TEAEs were defined as AEs observed after the first administration of the study drugs for the treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related serious TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to withdrawal of treatment
|
23 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any TEAEs
|
131 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
133 Participants
|
120 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Mild
|
113 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
116 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Moderate
|
15 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Severe
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related TEAEs
|
76 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related TEAEs leading to death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Serious TEAEs
|
10 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Drug-related TEAEs leading to withdrawal of treat.
|
12 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28 and 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
The OABSS questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants with 4 questions regarding their OAB symptoms. For each participant, the OABSS total score was calculated from the sum total of the score of each question. The total score ranges from 0 to 15 with higher score indicating more symptoms. The OABSS data obtained at week 0 were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 52
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
End of treatment
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-4.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 4
|
-2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-3.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 8
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-3.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 12
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-4.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 16
|
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-3.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) Total Score
Week 28
|
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 (end of treatment)Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Normalization for OABSS Total Score was defined as OABSS total score ≤ 2 or OABSS Question 3 score ≤ 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=164 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=160 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization for OABSS Total Score
|
98 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
91 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12, 28 and 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Symptom Severity and the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL). The Symptom Severity section included 6 questions. For each participant, the symptom severity score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 1 to 6. The total score ranges from 6 to 36 with higher symptom severity score indicating greater symptom bother. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Symptom Severity Score
Week 12
|
-18.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.89
|
-20.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.40
|
-17.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.37
|
-21.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Symptom Severity Score
Week 52
|
-20.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.29
|
-20.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.33
|
-20.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.28
|
-22.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Symptom Severity Score
Week 28
|
-21.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.15
|
-21.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.18
|
-20.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.23
|
-21.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Symptom Severity Score
End of treatment
|
-18.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.42
|
-18.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.14
|
-18.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.11
|
-21.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12, 28 and 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Severity Symptom and the HRQL. The HRQL section included 13 questions. For each participant, the total HRQL score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 7 to 19. The total score ranges from 13 to 78 with higher total HRQL score indicating greater HRQL. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 12
|
12.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.37
|
11.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.15
|
11.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.72
|
12.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 28
|
15.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.63
|
13.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.00
|
14.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.16
|
12.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Week 52
|
15.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.63
|
13.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.04
|
14.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.88
|
15.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
End of treatment
|
14.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.98
|
12.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.89
|
13.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.72
|
14.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
End of treatment
|
-2.18 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
-1.89 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
-1.75 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
-1.91 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.85 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
-1.89 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
-1.62 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
-1.72 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-2.04 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-1.90 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
-1.74 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
-2.18 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-2.33 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-2.21 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
-1.86 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
-2.20 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 28
|
-2.29 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.05
|
-2.10 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
-1.97 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
2.33 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 40
|
-2.12 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
-1.97 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
-1.80 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
-1.92 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 52
|
-2.29 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
-2.08 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
-1.82 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
-1.80 micturitions
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-1.57 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
-1.44 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
-1.23 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
-1.51 micturitions
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 (end of treatment)Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was defined as \< 8 micturitions per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=155 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=157 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=156 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
60 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis.A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urgency episode was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urgency episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=153 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=148 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=150 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=148 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-2.30 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
-2.36 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
-2.01 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
-2.26 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 28
|
-2.28 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
-2.26 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-2.18 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
-2.28 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-1.53 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
-1.63 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
-1.23 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
-1.49 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.78 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
-1.90 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
-1.50 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
-1.89 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-2.06 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
-2.18 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
-1.88 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
-2.10 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 40
|
-2.14 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
-2.27 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-2.14 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
-2.19 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 52
|
-2.04 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
-2.33 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
-2.15 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
-2.26 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
End of treatment
|
-2.03 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
-2.24 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
-2.04 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
-2.07 urgency episodes
Standard Deviation 2.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 (end of treatment)Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was defined as no urgency episode per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=147 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=143 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=149 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=146 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
70 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinary incontinence'" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=91 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=94 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=102 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=95 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-1.13 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
-1.06 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
-0.81 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-1.09 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.16 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
-1.21 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
-0.74 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-1.21 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.27 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
-1.34 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-0.86 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-1.23 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-1.23 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
-1.32 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-0.97 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-1.33 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 28
|
-1.31 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
-1.28 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
-0.99 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.28 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 40
|
-1.23 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
-1.28 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
-0.96 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-1.07 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 52
|
-1.31 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
-1.29 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
-1.02 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-1.18 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
End of treatment
|
-1.25 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
-1.18 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
-1.03 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-1.15 incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 (end of treatment)Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was defined as no incontinence episode per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=87 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=92 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=101 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=93 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
61 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urge incontinence episode was defined as any episode when both urgency and incontinence occurred concurrently. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" and "urinary incontinence'" were indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urge incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=80 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=82 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=85 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=84 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4
|
-1.13 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-1.00 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-0.72 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
-0.96 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8
|
-1.15 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
-1.14 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-0.71 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-1.05 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12
|
-1.20 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-1.25 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
-0.79 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-1.13 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 16
|
-1.17 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-1.22 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
-0.87 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-1.22 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 28
|
-1.26 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
-1.10 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
-0.85 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.18 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 40
|
-1.19 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
-1.14 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-0.91 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-1.07 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 52
|
-1.23 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.14 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
-0.93 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.15 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
End of treatment
|
-1.20 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.12 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
-0.91 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-1.05 urge incontinence episodes
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean volume per micturition was calculated by taking the sum of the urinary volumes where the volume voided was \> 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated in the patient diary, divided by the number of micturitions where the volume voided was \> 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated. Only participants who had volume voided was \> 0 at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 4
|
30.677 mL
Standard Deviation 37.450
|
30.111 mL
Standard Deviation 39.034
|
20.062 mL
Standard Deviation 30.816
|
32.854 mL
Standard Deviation 41.598
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 8
|
38.328 mL
Standard Deviation 41.753
|
38.614 mL
Standard Deviation 43.030
|
23.820 mL
Standard Deviation 35.972
|
35.351 mL
Standard Deviation 35.449
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 12
|
39.452 mL
Standard Deviation 43.802
|
41.433 mL
Standard Deviation 45.910
|
27.072 mL
Standard Deviation 41.636
|
36.598 mL
Standard Deviation 46.230
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 16
|
39.952 mL
Standard Deviation 46.871
|
40.661 mL
Standard Deviation 48.257
|
24.489 mL
Standard Deviation 41.184
|
37.786 mL
Standard Deviation 44.837
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 28
|
36.025 mL
Standard Deviation 50.761
|
41.887 mL
Standard Deviation 48.797
|
29.873 mL
Standard Deviation 48.976
|
34.823 mL
Standard Deviation 42.451
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 40
|
43.578 mL
Standard Deviation 51.692
|
43.102 mL
Standard Deviation 52.130
|
29.826 mL
Standard Deviation 44.442
|
41.378 mL
Standard Deviation 43.053
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 52
|
41.744 mL
Standard Deviation 47.045
|
40.599 mL
Standard Deviation 45.607
|
36.653 mL
Standard Deviation 46.041
|
40.548 mL
Standard Deviation 48.033
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
End of treatment
|
40.004 mL
Standard Deviation 45.095
|
38.691 mL
Standard Deviation 46.429
|
32.854 mL
Standard Deviation 44.481
|
40.683 mL
Standard Deviation 46.566
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void. Night time was defined as the period between bedtime and the wake-up time the following day (micturitions at the same time as the wake-up time were excluded). The mean number of nocturia episodes per night was calculated by taking the sum of nocturia episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated during the night time, divided by the number of nights. Only participants who had a nocturia episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=144 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=137 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=143 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=134 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 12
|
-0.45 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-0.28 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.45 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.47 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 4
|
-0.33 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.29 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
-0.32 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.49 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 8
|
-0.42 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
-0.37 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
-0.42 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 16
|
-0.49 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.37 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-0.54 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.50 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 28
|
-0.42 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.39 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.48 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-0.54 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 40
|
-0.53 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.45 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.39 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.54 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Week 52
|
-0.55 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.53 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.50 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
End of treatment
|
-0.47 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.38 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.48 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.48 nocturia episodes
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 (end of treatment)Population: FAS participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis. A last visit analysis (at the end of treatment) was performed to ensure all participants with postbaseline data were included in the analyses. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used for the end of treatment analysis.
Normalization for the mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours was defined as no nocturia episode per 24 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=137 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=131 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=139 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=130 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
26 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52Population: SAF
Measurement of PVR volume was made using either ultrasonography or urethral catheterization, provided that the same method was used for the same participant throughout the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 52
|
3.56 mL
Standard Deviation 17.51
|
4.58 mL
Standard Deviation 22.19
|
2.84 mL
Standard Deviation 19.94
|
2.02 mL
Standard Deviation 24.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 28
|
2.95 mL
Standard Deviation 19.97
|
3.87 mL
Standard Deviation 19.82
|
5.56 mL
Standard Deviation 23.90
|
5.07 mL
Standard Deviation 29.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 32
|
0.70 mL
Standard Deviation 16.90
|
1.34 mL
Standard Deviation 17.28
|
2.19 mL
Standard Deviation 17.26
|
3.11 mL
Standard Deviation 25.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 36
|
4.11 mL
Standard Deviation 19.17
|
0.66 mL
Standard Deviation 17.96
|
2.18 mL
Standard Deviation 19.97
|
3.12 mL
Standard Deviation 17.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 4
|
9.07 mL
Standard Deviation 23.79
|
9.99 mL
Standard Deviation 36.05
|
6.81 mL
Standard Deviation 22.11
|
8.21 mL
Standard Deviation 28.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 8
|
10.68 mL
Standard Deviation 34.38
|
3.23 mL
Standard Deviation 20.40
|
5.77 mL
Standard Deviation 25.39
|
8.39 mL
Standard Deviation 29.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 12
|
4.72 mL
Standard Deviation 19.47
|
3.67 mL
Standard Deviation 20.42
|
7.19 mL
Standard Deviation 27.66
|
6.04 mL
Standard Deviation 28.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 16
|
7.51 mL
Standard Deviation 22.06
|
1.06 mL
Standard Deviation 18.74
|
4.04 mL
Standard Deviation 20.69
|
8.67 mL
Standard Deviation 49.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 20
|
2.32 mL
Standard Deviation 18.01
|
3.53 mL
Standard Deviation 19.43
|
2.97 mL
Standard Deviation 19.82
|
4.68 mL
Standard Deviation 27.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 24
|
4.99 mL
Standard Deviation 21.14
|
4.03 mL
Standard Deviation 22.38
|
2.79 mL
Standard Deviation 16.06
|
1.46 mL
Standard Deviation 17.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 40
|
6.03 mL
Standard Deviation 21.79
|
3.29 mL
Standard Deviation 23.24
|
5.19 mL
Standard Deviation 23.09
|
5.40 mL
Standard Deviation 35.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 44
|
2.17 mL
Standard Deviation 16.40
|
1.03 mL
Standard Deviation 16.89
|
3.14 mL
Standard Deviation 21.56
|
0.50 mL
Standard Deviation 18.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Week 48
|
2.60 mL
Standard Deviation 16.30
|
0.71 mL
Standard Deviation 17.05
|
2.22 mL
Standard Deviation 17.58
|
2.33 mL
Standard Deviation 26.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
End of treatment
|
8.17 mL
Standard Deviation 39.42
|
6.83 mL
Standard Deviation 32.20
|
4.52 mL
Standard Deviation 23.51
|
5.94 mL
Standard Deviation 35.83
|
Adverse Events
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
Mirabegron + Propiverine
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
General disorders
Disuse syndrome
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic hepatitis C
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vestibular neuronitis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc disorder
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma stage I
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine cancer
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal operation
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cataract operation
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Microscopic polyangiitis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Mirabegron + Solifenacin
n=166 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and solifenacin 5 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of solifenacin 10 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Propiverine
n=161 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and propiverine 20 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of propiverine 40 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Imidafenacin
n=161 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and imidafenacin 0.2 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 8 weeks. In the next 44 weeks, participants continued to receive mirabegron 50 mg, but received an increased dose of imidafenacin 0.4 mg, if the treatment was not effective.
|
Mirabegron + Tolterodine
n=159 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg and tolterodine 4 mg once daily after breakfast orally for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
4.2%
7/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
22.3%
37/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
16.8%
27/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
14.9%
24/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
11.9%
19/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.7%
6/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.8%
3/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
19.3%
32/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
31.7%
51/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
24.8%
40/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
25.2%
40/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
1.2%
2/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
1.2%
2/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.7%
6/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
1.2%
2/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
10.8%
18/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
8.1%
13/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
15.5%
25/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
6.3%
10/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.8%
3/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
21.1%
35/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
24.2%
39/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
21.1%
34/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
20.1%
32/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
3.6%
6/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
2.4%
4/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.4%
4/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.7%
6/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Investigations
Residual urine volume increased
|
3.6%
6/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
5.0%
8/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.8%
3/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.7%
6/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
3.0%
5/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
0.60%
1/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Periarthritis
|
0.00%
0/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.2%
2/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.1%
5/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.0%
5/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
4.8%
8/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.9%
3/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
4.4%
7/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.4%
4/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.62%
1/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
1.8%
3/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
4.3%
7/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.3%
2/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
3.0%
5/166 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
1.2%
2/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
3.7%
6/161 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
2.5%
4/159 • From first dose of study drug up to week 52
Safety Analysis Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript prior to publication for review and comment.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER