Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Bioimaging Trial of DS-8895a in Patients With Advanced EphA2 Positive Cancers (NCT NCT02252211)
NCT ID: NCT02252211
Last Updated: 2022-10-12
Results Overview
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
PHASE1
Target enrollment
9 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Continuously for up to 58 weeks
Results posted on
2022-10-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 10 mg/kg
Patients were to receive infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Received Dose 1 (Day 1)
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Received Dose 2 (Day 8)
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Received Dose 3 (Day 22)
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Received Dose 4 (Day 36)
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Received Further Doses (Through Dose 24)
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 10 mg/kg
Patients were to receive infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Progressive disease
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Serious Adverse Event During Screening
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Bioimaging Trial of DS-8895a in Patients With Advanced EphA2 Positive Cancers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
Total
n=7 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=99 Participants
|
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1 • n=107 Participants
|
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
24.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=99 Participants
|
28.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=107 Participants
|
26.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Continuously for up to 58 weeksPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a.
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Any TEAE
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 1 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 2 TEAE
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 5 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Treatment-related TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
TEAE leading to study withdrawal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 43Population: The Safety Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a.
The biodistribution and tumor uptake of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a was determined based on qualitative analysis of whole body positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) images. PET imaging was performed following the \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a infusions on Day 1 (Days 1, 4/5, and 7/8) and Day 36 (Days 36, 39/40 and 42/43). Qualitative parameters assessed included tumor uptake of reference lesions (scored on a 0-3 point scale: none, low, med, high). The reference lesions were initially identified on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans with a score of 3 for \[18F\]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. The summary table presents the maximum reference lesion \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a uptake score reported for individual patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Tumor Uptake of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a
Maximum Lesion Uptake Score 0 (No Uptake)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Tumor Uptake of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a
Maximum Lesion Uptake Score 1
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Tumor Uptake of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a
Maximum Lesion Uptake Score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Tumor Uptake of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a
Maximum Lesion Uptake Score 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 58 weeksPopulation: The Evaluable Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and completed all study procedures up to Day 50.
Tumor responses were evaluated using computed tomography and categorized according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1) at Screening (up to 21 days before the first dose of study drug), on Day 50, and approximately every 6 weeks thereafter for patients who received continued study dosing. Per RECIST, target lesions are categorized as follows: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=1 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=1 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Best Overall Tumor Response
Stable disease
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Best Overall Tumor Response
Progressive disease
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis.
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a were calculated based on data from gamma counting of serum samples. Serum samples for gamma counting were drawn on Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion), Day 2 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 4/5 (anytime), Day 36 (pre-infusion, and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post infusion), Day 37 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 39/40 (anytime), Day 42/43 (anytime), and Day 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Area Under the Serum Concentration Curve of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
349.0 hr*μg/mL
Standard Deviation 24.6
|
486.5 hr*μg/mL
Standard Deviation 169.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis.
The PK of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a was calculated based on data from gamma counting of serum samples. Serum samples for gamma counting were drawn on Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion), Day 2 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 4/5 (anytime), Day 36 (pre-infusion, and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post infusion), Day 37 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 39/40 (anytime), Day 42/43 (anytime), and Day 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
64.3 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
51.3 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis.
The PK of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a was calculated based on data from gamma counting of serum samples. Serum samples for gamma counting were drawn on Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion), Day 2 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 4/5 (anytime), Day 36 (pre-infusion, and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post infusion), Day 37 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 39/40 (anytime), Day 42/43 (anytime), and Day 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Total Serum Clearance of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
0.6 mL/hr/kg
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
0.5 mL/hr/kg
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis.
The PK of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a was calculated based on data from gamma counting of serum samples. Serum samples for gamma counting were drawn on Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion), Day 2 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 4/5 (anytime), Day 36 (pre-infusion, and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post infusion), Day 37 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 39/40 (anytime), Day 42/43 (anytime), and Day 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Maximum Serum Concentration of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
3.1 µg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
4.2 µg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis.
The PK of \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a was calculated based on data from gamma counting of serum samples. Serum samples for gamma counting were drawn on Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion), Day 2 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 4/5 (anytime), Day 36 (pre-infusion, and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post infusion), Day 37 (24 hours post-infusion), Day 39/40 (anytime), Day 42/43 (anytime), and Day 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Elimination Half-life of ^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
77.4 hr
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
79.9 hr
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis. One patient in the 1 mg/kg cohort did not have adequate samples to calculate PK parameters for this analysis.
The PK of DS-8895a was calculated based on data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of serum samples. Serum samples for ELISA were drawn at the same times as for gamma counting with the addition of Day 8 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion), Day 9 (anytime), and Day 22 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Area Under the Serum Concentration Curve of DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
255.2 hr*μg/mL
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
391.0 hr*μg/mL
Standard Deviation 190.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis. One patient in the 1 mg/kg cohort did not have adequate samples to calculate PK parameters for this analysis.
The PK of DS-8895a was calculated based on data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of serum samples. Serum samples for ELISA were drawn at the same times as for gamma counting with the addition of Day 8 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion), Day 9 (anytime), and Day 22 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State of DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
51.8 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
42.1 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis. One patient in the 1 mg/kg cohort did not have adequate samples to calculate PK parameters for this analysis.
The PK of DS-8895a was calculated based on data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of serum samples. Serum samples for ELISA were drawn at the same times as for gamma counting with the addition of Day 8 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion), Day 9 (anytime), and Day 22 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Total Serum Clearance of DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
0.6 mL/hr/kg
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
0.5 mL/hr/kg
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis. One patient in the 1 mg/kg cohort did not have adequate samples to calculate PK parameters for this analysis.
The PK of DS-8895a was calculated based on data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of serum samples. Serum samples for ELISA were drawn at the same times as for gamma counting with the addition of Day 8 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion), Day 9 (anytime), and Day 22 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Maximum Serum Concentration of DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
3.0 µg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
4.0 µg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pre-infusion and 5 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-infusion)Population: The PK Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a and had evaluable PK samples for a given analysis. One patient in the 1 mg/kg cohort did not have adequate samples to calculate PK parameters for this analysis.
The PK of DS-8895a was calculated based on data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of serum samples. Serum samples for ELISA were drawn at the same times as for gamma counting with the addition of Day 8 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion), Day 9 (anytime), and Day 22 (pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion). For Cycle 2 onward, blood samples for PK were taken at pre- and 0 to 30 minutes post-infusion on Days 1, 15, and 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Elimination Half-life of DS-8895a Following the First Infusion
|
59.3 hr
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
65.3 hr
Standard Deviation 20.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 and Day 50Population: The Safety Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a.
The pharmacodynamic (metabolic) response of DS-8895a was assessed by \^18F-FDG PET at Screening, Day 29, and Day 50. Tumor metabolism response was evaluated as the difference in standardized uptake values between the pre- and post-treatment FDG PET scans. The measurement of \[18F\]-FDG uptake for tumor metabolic response monitoring was performed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET response criteria (Young et al. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:1773-82).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Pharmacodynamic (Metabolic) Response
Stable Disease at Days 29 and 50
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Pharmacodynamic (Metabolic) Response
Stable Disease at Day 29, Progression at Day 50
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Pharmacodynamic (Metabolic) Response
Progressive Disease at Day 29
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 43 WeeksPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set comprised all patients who received at least 1 infusion of DS-8895a.
Blood samples to detect human anti-human antibody (HAHA) formation were collected on Days 1 (pre-infusion \[within 7 days of Day 1 dose\] and post-infusion), 8, 22, 36 (pre-infusion), and 50 (anytime). For Cycle 2 onward, HAHA samples were collected on Day 1 (pre-infusion) and at the end of the study (anytime). HAHA samples were analyzed using ELISA and were categorized as either positive or negative for a HAHA response. HAHA positivity indicates that a patient has developed an antibody response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=4 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Human Anti-Human Antibody Positivity
Negative HAHA Results at all Time Points
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Human Anti-Human Antibody Positivity
Positive HAHA Results (Single Sample)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths
DS-8895a 10 mg/kg
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=5 participants at risk
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations; 1 patient was enrolled but discontinued due to SAEs prior to receiving study treatment.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations.
|
DS-8895a 10 mg/kg
n=1 participants at risk
Patients were to have received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations; 1 patient was enrolled but discontinued due to an SAE prior to receiving study treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm progression
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer Pain
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
1/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
DS-8895a 1 mg/kg
n=5 participants at risk
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 1 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations; 1 patient was enrolled but discontinued due to SAEs prior to receiving study treatment.
|
DS-8895a 3 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
Patients received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 3 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations.
|
DS-8895a 10 mg/kg
n=1 participants at risk
Patients were to have received infusions with \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg on Day 1, DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22, and \^89Zr-Df-DS-8895a at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 36. Patients who responded or had stable disease per RECIST version 1.1 at the Day 50 restaging may have continued to receive biweekly treatment with DS-8895a until disease progression.
All enrolled patients are included in AE tabulations; 1 patient was enrolled but discontinued due to an SAE prior to receiving study treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
40.0%
2/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
40.0%
2/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal stenosis
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
60.0%
3/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Crepitations
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cold sweat
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin mass
|
20.0%
1/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
1/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram abnormal
|
0.00%
0/5 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/1 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 58 weeks.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTCAE (version 4.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
Additional Information
Jonathan Skipper PhD
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Phone: 12124501539
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60