In-vivo Comparison of Different Levels of Femoral Rollback in a Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT02251535 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2014-09-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Retrospective non-randomized in-vivo comparison of different levels of femoral rollback in the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasiy system (rotating platform CR high level roll back vs. rotating platform CR low level roll back) on the basis of fluoroscopic and marker-based motion capture evaluation. How do different levels of intra-operatively observed femoral rollback correlate to postoperative kinematics under weight bearing conditions? Does the modified design of the Attune Knee System influence the extent of the femoral rollback compared to the PFC Sigma Knee System? Does the femoral rollback maintain over a period of 12 months follow up or is it reduced by, for example, remodelling of the posterior cruciate ligament?

Conditions

  • Gonarthrosis

Interventions

DEVICE

ATTUNE® Knee System

DEVICE

PFC® SIGMA® Knee System

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Julius Wolff Institute

    collaborator OTHER
  • Prof. Dr. Carsten Perka

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-07-31
Primary Completion
2015-04-30
Completion
2015-09-30

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02251535 on ClinicalTrials.gov