MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between 4 Different Nasal Dilators

NCT02196389 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2024-07-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Several nasal dilators are currently commercially available, and can be applied endonasally (Airmax°, Nozovent and Nasanita°) or externally (Breath Right°). An objective comparison between these dilators has not been made so far, and would help the clinicians to advise the use of any of these dilators. From clinical experience, endonasal dilators are well supported and improve breathing better than the external dilators

Conditions

  • Incompetence of Nasal Valve

Interventions

DEVICE

Nasal dilator Nasanita

Nasal Dilator

DEVICE

Nasal dilator Nozovent

DEVICE

Nasal dilator Breath Right

DEVICE

Nasal dilator Airmax

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Peter Hellings, Prof Dr · UZ Leuven

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2018-08-18
Completion
2018-08-18

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02196389 on ClinicalTrials.gov