Comparison Between Two Dose Levels of Daunorubicin and Between One vs. Two Induction Cycles for Adult Patients With AML
NCT02140242 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 721
Last updated 2023-09-15
Summary
The proposed trial will address two clinically important questions for younger patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML): the optimal dose of daunorubicin in induction therapy and the necessity of a second induction cycle in patients with a good response after the first induction. The primary endpoint is the rate of good responders. Secondary outcomes will be relapse-free survival, overall survival and minimal residual disease kinetics. Patients will be recruited in about 40 treatment centers of the Study Alliance Leukemia study group over a period of 40 months. The results will be of great clinical relevance: First, the study could facilitate the establishment or confirmation of the optimal daunorubicin dose.
Conditions
- Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute
Interventions
- DRUG
-
study part 1 - dose daunorubicin
standard induction dose of daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 3-5
- PROCEDURE
-
induction cycles
single induction cycle versus double induction cycles (only patients with good response after first induction) Allocation is randomized for cytogenetic risk.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital Dresden
collaborator OTHER -
Masaryk University
collaborator OTHER -
Technische Universität Dresden
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Christoph Röllig, Prof. Dr. · Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-04-16
- Primary Completion
- 2022-04-25
- Completion
- 2022-04-25
Countries
- Czechia
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Study of Decitabine With or Without Eltrombopag in AML Patients
NCT02446145 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT04069208 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Idarubicin Versus High Dose Daunorubicin in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT01145846 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Trial Evaluating Induction Therapy With Idarubicin and Etoposide Plus Sequential or Concurrent Azacitidine and Maintenance Therapy With Azacitidine
NCT01180322 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy of Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Induction Regimen in Adult AML
NCT03021330 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Decitabine Versus Conventional Chemotherapy for Maintenance Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21)
NCT03026842 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of Remission Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Allogeneic SCT in Relapsed and Poor-response Patients With AML
NCT02461537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Combination Chemotherapy and Dasatinib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01238211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Optimizing Induction Chemotherapy Regimens for ND Elderly AML Patients Who Are Eligible for Intense Chemotherapy
NCT06066242 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Cytarabine + Daunorubicin Therapy Versus Cytarabine + Daunorubicin + Venetoclax Versus Venetoclax + Azacitidine in Younger Patients With Intermediate Risk AML (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
NCT05554393 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treatment of Adults Aged Up to 60 Years With De Novo Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia,Secondary AML, or RAEB-T
NCT00209833 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Study to Improve OS in 18 to 60 Year-old Patients, Comparing Daunorubicin Versus High Dose Idarubicin Induction Regimens, High Dose Versus Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Consolidation Regimens, and Standard Versus MMF Prophylaxis of GvHD in Allografted Patients in First CR
NCT02416388 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Phase I AZD2171 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML and Elderly Patients With DeNovo or Secondary AML
NCT00502385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating AMG 232 Alone and in Combination With Trametinib in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT02016729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
HAV Versus DAV/IAV Induction Regimen in Elderly Patients With AML
NCT06744556 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Bone Marrow or Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00002549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, and Midostaurin in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00651261 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Risk-Adapted Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia of Adults (18-60 Years) According to the Cytogenetic Result
NCT00146120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Maintenance Azacitidine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in CR After Induction Chemotherapy
NCT00387647 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Protocol in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3-ITD
NCT01477606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Randomized Trial of a Combination of Nintedanib/Placebo in Combination With Induction Chemotherapy for Patients With Refractory or First Relapse Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT02665143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT02971397 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Comparison to Conventional Consolidation Therapy for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (Intermediate Risk) </= 60y. After First CR
NCT01246752 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Feasibility and Outcomes of Allogeneic HCT Compared to Chemotherapy in Older AML Patients
NCT01929408 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HDM201 Added to CT in R/R or Newly Diagnosed AML
NCT03760445 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2