Fluoroscopically-guided Versus Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections
NCT02096653 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 125
Last updated 2018-02-07
Summary
In this study, the investigators are attempting to determine whether intra- or extra-articular injections are more effective; the relative prevalence rate of intra-articular and extra-articular SI joint pain; and the accuracy of extra-articular injections using fluoroscopy as the reference standard. 124 consecutive patients with mechanical low back pain below L5, tenderness overlying the SI joint(s) and at least 3 positive provocative maneuvers will be randomized to receive SI joint injections by 2 different approaches.
Group 1 will receive fluoroscopically-guided injections into the joint. Group 2 will receive landmark-guided injections into the tender area around the joint. In order to determine whether the injection in group 2 was intra-articular or extra-articular, an x-ray will be done after the injection to ascertain the location of contrast spread. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief at 1-month. Patients who obtain benefit at 1-month will be followed at 3-months, while those who fail to obtain benefit will exit the study to receive alternative care.
Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
X-ray SI joint steroid injection
Injection of steroid and local anesthetic into the joint cavity using fluoroscopic guidance
- PROCEDURE
-
Landmark-guided SI steroid injection
Injection of steroid into the joint area based on palpation. The injection may be inside the joint (intra-articular) or outside the joint in the ligaments (extra-articular)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
collaborator FED -
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
collaborator FED -
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
collaborator OTHER -
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
collaborator FED - lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-11-30
- Completion
- 2017-11-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Role of Intra-articular Injection of PRP Versus Corticosteriods in Treatment of Lumbar Facet Disease
NCT04860531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Predictive Factors for LBP Interventional Treatment Outcomes
NCT02329951 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prognostic Factors in Zygapophyseal Osteoarthritis Infiltration: a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT03304730 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Prospective Trial of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves Versus Facet Joint Injection of Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome
NCT03614793 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
iFuse Implant System® Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis
NCT01741025 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-Market Clinical Study on a Modular SI Joint Fusion System
NCT05916092 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI)
NCT01640353 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
SI Joint Fusion and Decortication Using the SImmetry System
NCT02560714 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Improve Interventional Outcomes for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy?
NCT00826124 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (Mild®) in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis
NCT00995371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Order of Treatment in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02103543 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Platelet-rich Plasma Infiltration Versus Corticosteroid Infiltration (Prednisolone) in Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome
NCT05105256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Spinelink® Fixation In The Treatment Of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis And Spinal Instability
NCT00726310 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Investigation of Sacroiliac Fusion Treatment (INSITE)
NCT01681004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Transfixing and Fusion: Meaningful Long Term Outcomes With Nevro1
NCT06909292 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Synvisc Injections for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain
NCT00325845 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prolotherapy Versus Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) for Lumbar Pain Radiating to the Leg
NCT01934868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
SI Joint Stabilization in Long Fusion to the Pelvis
NCT04062630 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evolusion Study Using the Zyga SImmetry Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System
NCT02074761 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Study Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Different Rate of Infusion in Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection
NCT02939482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Steroid Injections Given at the "Level of MRI Pathology" Versus at the "Level of Clinical Symptoms" to See if One is More Effective Than the Other.
NCT02196883 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Corticosteroid vs. Dextrose Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain.
NCT02116075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Two Different Approaches During Fluoroscopically Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection
NCT01760317 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Incidence of the Intravascular Injection During S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Two Approaches: Medial vs Lateral in Anteroposterior View
NCT02867046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoroscopy Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injection Versus Ultrasound Guided Injection in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Facet Syndrome
NCT03770585 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA