Effectiveness of the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline

NCT02085616 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 586

Last updated 2014-03-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the high-intensity proactive service with the low-intensity reactive service at the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline (SNTQ). Our hypothesis was that the effectiveness is about 5% higher in proactive than in reactive service.

The structured treatment protocol is a mixture of motivational interviewing (MI), cognitive behavior therapy, and pharmacological consultation.The standard process at the SNTQ is to offer the client a choice of callback (proactive service) or no callback (reactive service). In the present study clients were not offered a choice, but were randomized to proactive service on even dates and to reactive service on odd dates. Data are collected through postal questionnaires, one baseline and one follow-up after 12 months.

Conditions

  • Smoking Cessation
  • Tobacco Cessation

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Proactive service

In the proactive service the callers to the quitline are offered a number of callbacks.

BEHAVIORAL

Reactive service

In the reactive service the callers to the quitline are informed that they can themselves call back whenever they like.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Karolinska Institutet

    collaborator OTHER
  • Region Stockholm

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Västmanland County Council, Sweden

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Swedish Heart Lung Foundation

    collaborator OTHER
  • Swedish Cancer Society

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Swedish Research Council

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research

    collaborator OTHER
  • Uppsala University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hans Gilljam, Prof · Karolinska Institutet

  • Ásgeir R Helgason, Assoc prof · Karolisnka Institutet

  • Eva Nohlert, PhD · Centre for Clinical Research Västerås, Uppsala University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-02-28
Primary Completion
2011-10-31
Completion
2011-10-31

Countries

  • Sweden

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02085616 on ClinicalTrials.gov