Significance of Peritoneal Washing Cytology Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Esophagogastric-junction Cancer
NCT02085564 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 87
Last updated 2015-06-03
Summary
Background:
The prevalence of gastroesophageal-junction cancer (cancer between the distal part of the oesophagus, and proximal part of the stomach/GEJ-cancer) is increasing in Denmark with more than 400 patients per year. The 5-year overall survival is less than 10% for the 2/3 of the patients, which are not considered resectable. Even for the 1/3, which is treated with surgical intervention and neoadjuvant chemotherapy the overall-survival is approximately 30%.
The current Danish intended curative treatment consists of esophagectomy (surgical resection of the oesophagus with extended lymphadenectomy in abdomen and thorax (removal of lymphnodes)). Furthermore, perioperative chemotherapy consists of 6 series neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3 series before, and 3 series after operation).
Unresectable patients receive palliative chemotherapy and no resection. Peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) is a recommended prediagnostic modality in gastric cancer patients. The method is used to detect free peritoneal cancer cells in the abdominal cavity even when macroscopic carcinomatosis is not present (i.e. the cancer has spread to other parts of the abdomen).
Carcinomatosis can be found in up to 19% in gastric cancer patients often in the peritoneum. Positive peritoneal cytology (C1) can be identified in up to 7% of gastric cancer patients without metastases (C1M0), i.e. malignant cells can be identified in the peritoneal washing, but tumor spread has not been identified.
Lots of studies indicate that C1-disease is an independent prognostic predictor for decreased survival, and increased recurrence rate, comparable with M1 patients (i.e. patients with distant metastases).
The American Joint Committee on cancer recommends that C1 patients should be treated non-surgically - even when M1 disease has not been identified.
On the basis of the above, PWC can be used to identify patients at greater risk for recurrence, and thereby not candidates for intended curative treatment.
It is a fact, though, that C1M0 patients have a better survival than C1M1 patients. Currently, there is no level-1 evidence for specific treatment of C1M0 patients, why further research is required to approach this patient group in the most comprehensive way. The focus group of our study is therefore C1M0 patients, because of the difference in opinions. Furthermore most evidence is based on gastric carcinomas, why GEJ-cancer patients are the group, we will examine.
Purpose:
Peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) is performed as a standard prediagnostic modality at Rigshospitalet, for patients with gastric- and GEJ cancer, considered resectable at preceding multidisciplinary conference. Most studies in the past 20-years have focused on gastric cancer, and not specifically GEJ-cancer.
This study will determine the usefulness of peritoneal washing cytology, and thereby verifying our own standard regarding GEJ-cancer. Furthermore, we will determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on free peritoneal tumor cells and its correlation with overall survival.
This study is intended as a validation of our own standard.
Conditions
- Gastroesophageal-junction Cancer
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Peritoneal washing cytology
The methode is describes in the detailed study description
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Danish Cancer Society
collaborator OTHER -
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lars Bo Svendsen, Prof., MD., DMSc. · Department of surgical gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet
-
Michael Patrick Achiam, MD. phD. · Department of surgical gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet
-
Rune Broni Strandby, Junior researcher · Department of surgical gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-06-30
- Completion
- 2015-06-30
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Study of Minimally Invasive Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Total Gastrectomy for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
NCT06243757 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Analysis of Tumor Deposit at the Fusion Site of the Right Gastric Mesentery and Left Gastric Mesentery in the Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Received Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06728891 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Prophylactic EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy in Advanced Periampullary Cancers
NCT05994521 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Gastric Partitioning Procedure for the Treatment of Unresectable and Obstructive Distal Gastric Cancer
NCT02064803 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05605327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
G-POEM for Refractory Gastroparesis After Esophagectomy With Gastric Pull-through
NCT06068127 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Contrast Enhancement for Staging and Evaluation of Angiogenesis of Left Sided Colon Cancers
NCT02324023 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quantitative Fluorescent Guided Robotic Surgery for Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction
NCT04107623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Best Metric for Inspection Time During a Diagnostic and/or Surveillance Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Age ≥ 18 Years, Informed Consent), Between Total Inspection Time Versus Withdrawal Time, for the Identification of Malignant Lesions
NCT06696209 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sentinel Node Resection With or Without LECS After Noncurative ESD for EGC
NCT07295002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgical Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05564143 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Reliability of the Determination of MisMatch Repair Deficiency Status by Endoscopic Biopsies in Oesophagus and Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
NCT04774367 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tissue Procurement for Gastric Cancer, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), Esophageal Cancer, Pancreas Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer, Biliary Cancer, Neuroendocrine, Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Anal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer in Patients Undergoing Surgery or Biopsy
NCT01416714 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Endoscopic Gastroenterostomy Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy
NCT06567691 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Unroofing for Small Gastric SETs
NCT02587923 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
SUrveillance of PREMalignant Stomach - Individualized Endoscopic Follow-up
NCT04613570 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Review of Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy Procedures
NCT05012527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT03857737 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Surveillance on a High-risk Population for Gastric Cancer in Latin America: The ECHOS Cohort Study.
NCT05969444 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Expanded Indications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in China
NCT06869356 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Confocal Endomicroscopy Detection of Gastric Preneoplasia and Neoplasia
NCT01384201 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PG Versus TG for Advanced PGC
NCT06614439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Combine With Laparoscopic Regional Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02325999 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Application of OE in Diagnosis of EGC
NCT04720521 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Esophagogastric Reconstruction Method After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT05829213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA