Effect of Tunnel Placements on Clinical and MRI Findings Two Years After ACL Reconstruction With DB Technique
NCT02000258 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75
Last updated 2013-12-04
Summary
Purpose: To find out whether the clinical and MRI findings two years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were associated with each other so that MRI-based graft invisibility in the anteromedial (AM) graft would have an impact on anteroposterior stability of the knee, and MRI-based posterolateral (PL) graft invisibility on rotational stability of the knee.
Methods: 75 patients. One experienced orthopaedic surgeon performed all double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions. Two independent examiners made the clinical examinations at the two-year follow-up: clinical examination of the knee, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee evaluation scores and IKDC functional score. The MRI evaluations were made by two musculoskeletal radiologists separately and the means of these measurements were used.
Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Double-bundle ACL reconstruction
- DEVICE
-
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MRI sequences were as follows: sagittal T1-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, coronal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap, axial fat saturated PD FSE images with 4 mm slice and 1 mm gap and oblique sagittal and oblique coronal T1 FSE images along AM graft plane with 3 mm slice and 0.3 mm gap.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tampere University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Timo Järvelä, MD, PhD · Arthroscopic and sports medicine center Omasairaala, Helsinki, Finland
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2003-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-09-30
- Completion
- 2013-08-31
Countries
- Finland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Remnant Preservation and Tibial Tunnel Widening After ACL Reconstruction
NCT07236593 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single- vs. Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
NCT01319409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Tibial Tunnel Placement for ACL Reconstruction
NCT02374710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT00529958 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Residual Rotational Laxity for Single Versus Double Bundle Techniques
NCT01377129 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Kinesiotape on Postural Control in Non-operated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Subjects
NCT05256420 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Injury to the Kaplan Fibers in Adult and Pediatric Patients With ACL Injury
NCT06002308 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle
NCT01025895 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional MRI After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Transtibial Technique Versus Transportal Technique
NCT01513434 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Anatomical Direct Insertion Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02833454 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 3 Techniques for Recreation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomic Footprint
NCT02795247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anatomic and Biomechanical Investigation on ACL: A Cadaveric Study
NCT04957797 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02555917 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of ACL Reconstruction in Biomechanical Properties of Ankle Joint Complex
NCT06631690 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single and Double Bundle ACL Reconstructions, in Term of Cartilage Damage Due to Remaining Instability After Surgery.
NCT04626999 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
NCT06430775 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
STABILITY 2: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction +/- Lateral Tenodesis With Patellar vs Quad Tendon
NCT03935750 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and MRI Evaluation of ACL Reconstruction Results in Adolescents With Follow-up at Least 3 Years.
NCT05180123 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reduced Knee Flexion Strength 18 Years After ACL Reconstruction in Hamstring Group Compared to Patellar Tendon Group
NCT05876013 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Application of the Apex of the Deep Cartilage in Evaluating the Femoral Tunnel of the ACL Reconstruction
NCT04953546 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Clinical and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Ligament Augmentation in Comparison With ACL Reconstruction
NCT04429165 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Upper Limbs Motion During Single-leg Jump Landing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04629092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Multi-body Dynamics Modeling Information After ACL Rupture and Reconstruction
NCT04462432 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
ACL-reconstruction vs ACL-reconstruction With EAT
NCT02913404 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients.
NCT04644497 ·Status: COMPLETED